Publication Cover
International Journal of Social Psychology
Revista de Psicología Social
Volume 9, 1994 - Issue 1
1
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Análisis de la deliberación de jurados que varían en tamaño y regla de decisión

Effects of size and decision rule on jury decision-making

Pages 19-29 | Published online: 23 Jan 2014

Referencias

  • Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction Process Analysis. Cambridge: Mass Addison-Wesley.
  • Bales, R. F., y Borgatta, E. F. (1955). Size of group as a factor in the interaction profile. En Hare, A. D.; Borgatta, E. F., y Bales, R. F. (Eds): Small groups. Nueva York: Knopf.
  • Bales, R. F.; Strodtbeck, F. L.; Mills, T. M., y Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461–468.
  • Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and Social Interaction: A theory of Social decision Schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97–125.
  • Davis, J. H.; Kerr, N. L.; Atkin, R. S.; Holt, R. W., y Meek, D. (1975). The decision processes of 6 and 12 person mock juries asigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1–14.
  • Davis, J. H.; Stasser, G.; Spitzer, C. E., y Holt, R. W. (1976). Changes in group members' decision preferences during discussion: An illustration with mock juries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1.177–1.187.
  • Diamond, S. S. (1974). A Jury Experiment reanalyzed. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 7, 520–532.
  • Foss, R. D. (1981). Structural effects in simulated jury decision making. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 40 (6) 1.055–1.062.
  • Hastie, R.; Penrod, S. D., y Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge: Harvard University press.
  • Kerr, N. L.; Atkin, R. S.; Stasser, G.; Meek, D.; Holt, R. W., y Davis, J. H. (1976). Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 282–294.
  • Kessler, J. B. (1973). An empirical study of six and twelve-member jury decision making processes. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 6, 712–734.
  • Lempert, R. O. (1975). Uncovering non-discernible differences: Empirical research and the jury size cases. Michigan Law Review, 73, 644–708.
  • Nemeth, C. (1977). Interactions between juror as a function of majority vs. unanimity decision rules. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 38–56.
  • Nemeth, C. (1985). Procesos de grupo y jurados: Los Estados Unidos y Francia. En S. Moscovici (Ed.): Psicología Social I: Influencia y Cambio de actitudes. Individuo y Grupos. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Padawer-Singer, A. M.; Singer, A. N., y Singer, R. L. (1977). An experimental study of twelve vs. six member juries vider unanimous vs. no inanimous decision. En B. D. Sales (Ed.): Psychology in the Legal Process. Jamaica: Spectrum Publications.
  • Saks, M. J. (1980). Jury Veredicts: The role of Group Size and Social Decision Rule. Lexington: Heath, 1977.
  • Shaw, M. E. Dinámica de Grupo. Barcelona: Herder.
  • Thomas, E. J., y Fink, C. F. (1963). Effects of group size. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 371–384.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.