Referencias

• Blake, R. R. y Mouton, J. S. (1964). The Managerial Grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. D. (1983). Managing Conflict at Organizational Interfaces. Reading: Addison- Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, R. J. (1970). Methods of relosving superior-subordinate conflict: The constructive use of subordinate differences and disagreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. K. (1994). Conflict styles and outcomes in a negotiation with fully-integrative potential. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 5 (4), 309–325.
   Google Scholar
• Caramés, R. y Rodríguez, M. D. (1995). Contrastación de las propiedades psicométrias del CEN (Cuestionario de Eficacia Negociadora). En L. González, A. De La Torre y J. De Elena (Eds.), Psicología del Trabajo y las organizaciones, Gestión de los Recursos Humanos y Nuevas Tecnologías (pp. 643–655). Salamanca: Eudema.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. (1997). Productive conflict: the importance of conflict management and conflict issue. En C.K. De Dreu y E. van De Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 9–22). Londres: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. y Van de Vliert, E. (Eds.) (1997). Using conflict in organizations. Londres: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deustch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deustch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falbe, C. M. y Yulk, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single influences tactics and combination of tactics. Academy of Management Journal. 35, 638–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocker, J. L y Wilmot, W. W. (1991). Interpersonal conflict. 3a Ed. Iowa: William C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, O., Euwema, W., Stroebe, W. y Van DE VLIERT (1993). How Interdependence Motivates to Conflict Behavior. Trabajo presentado al Sixth Annual Conference of the International Association for Conflict Management. Houthalen, Bélgica.
   Google Scholar
• Kabanoff, B. y Van de Vliert, E. (1993). Behaviour Symmetry in Conflict Dyads and its Relation to Interpower and Conflict Outcomes. Paper presentado a la 6th annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management. Houthalen. Bélgica.
   Google Scholar
• Mastenbroeck, W. F. (1987). Conflict management and organizational development. Nueva York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Morril, C. y Thomas, C. K. (1992). Organizational Conflict Management as Disputing Process- The Problem of Social Escalation. Communication Research, 3 (18), 152–167.
   Google Scholar
• Munduate, L. (1988). Poder y Política en las Organizaciones. Libro de Ponencias del I Congreso Iberoamericano y III Congreso Nacional de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones. Madrid: Colegio Oficial de Psicológos.
   Google Scholar
• Munduate, L. (1992). Psicosociología de las Relaciones Laborales. Barcelona: PPU.
   Google Scholar
• Munduate, L., Ganaza, J., Alcaide, M. y Peiró, J. M. (1994). Global perspectives on organizational conflicts in Spain. En A. Rahim (Ed.), Global Perspectives on Organizational Conflict (pp. 103–134). Westport: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Munduate, L. y Martínez, J. M. (1994). Conflicto y Negociación. Madrid: Eudema.
   Google Scholar
• Nauta, A., Van de Vliert, E. y Siero, F. (1995). Dyadic efectiveness of symmetrical conflict interaction in organizations. Artículo presentado al 8th annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management. Elsinore. Dinamarca.
   Google Scholar
• Pffefer, J (1981). Power in Organizations. Marshfield: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 296–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G. (1983). Strategic Choice in Negotiation. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 167–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A. (1983). Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory -II: Forms a, b, and c. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A. (1985). A Strategy for Managing Conflict in Complex Organizations. Human Relations, 38, 81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A. (1990). A Normative Theory of Conflict Management: Matching Styles of Handling Interpersonal Conflict with Situations. Debate on Alternative Theoretical Approaches to Conflict Management. Third annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management. Vancouver. Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A. (1992). Managing Conflict in Organizations. (2a Ed.). Nueva York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A., Antonioni, D. y Psenicka, C. (1997). Leader power, conflict styles, and effectiveness: A field study with supervisor-subordinate dyads. Paper presentado al 10th annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management. Bonn, Alemania.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A. y Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing Organizational Conflict: A Model for Diagnosis and Intervention. Psychological Reports, 16, 143–155.
   Google Scholar
• Remeseiro, C. (1994). Estrategias y tácticas en procesos de negociación. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Oviedo.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. P. (1987). Comportamiento Organizational. México: Prentice-Hall (3a ed.)
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, D. (1989). Características individuales y conducta de negociación. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, D. (1990). Análisis de las características psicométricas y estructura factorial del Cuestionario de Eficacia en la Negociación «CEN». III Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social. Santiago de Compostela.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G. y Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate and settlement. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ruble, T. L. y Thomas, K. W. (1976). Support for a Two-Dimensional Model of Conflict Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R. y Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: a Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano, G. y Rodríguez, D. (1993). Negociación en las Organizaciones. Madrid: Eudema.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. En M. D. Dunnette y L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 651–717). Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Tutzauer, F. y Roloff, M. E. (1988). Communication processes leading to integrative agreements: Three paths to joint benefits. Communication Research, 15, 360–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vliert, E. (1993). Paths to Constructive Conflict Managements in Organization. En L. Munduate y M. Barón (Comps.), Gestión de Recursos Humanos y Calidad de Vida Laboral (pp. 13–29). Madrid: Eudema.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Complex Interpersonal Conflict Behaviour: Theoretical Frontiers. London: Psichology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Vliert, E. y Hordijk, J. W. (1989). A theoretical position of compromising among other styles of conflict management. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 681–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vliert, E. y Kabanoff, B. (1990). Toward Theory-Based Measures of Conflict Management. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 199–209.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Vliert, E. y De Dreu, C. (1994). Optimizing Performance by Conflict Stimulation. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 5 (3), 211–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vliert, E. y Euwema, M. C. (1994). Agreableness and Activeness as Component of Conflict Behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 66 (4), 674–687.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Vliert, E., Euwema, M. C. y Huismans, S. E. (1995). Managing conflict with a subordinate or a superior: Effectiveness of conglomerated bahavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80 (2), 271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vliert, E., Nauta, A., Euwema, M. C. y Janssen, O. (1997). The effectiveness of mixing problem solving and forcing. En C.K. De Dreu y E. van De Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 38–52). Londres: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R. E. (1987). Managing conflict: Interpersonal dialogue and third-party roles. 2a ed. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar