Referencias
- Carroll, J. S., Perkowitz, W. T., Lurigio, A. J. y Weaver, F. M. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology and personality. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52, 107–118.
- Clancy, K., Bartolomeo, J., Richardson, D. y Wellford, C. (1981). Sentence decisionmaking: the logic of sentence decisions and the extend and sources of sentence disparity. Journal of criminal law and criminology, 72, 524–554.
- Diamond, S. S. (1981). Exploring sources of sentence disparity. En B. D. Sales (Ed.), The trial process (pp. 387–411). Nueva York: Plenum Press.
- Jacob, R. (1997). Is the judge's role to be reformulated? A socio-psychological approach to office and practice. En S. Redondo, V. Garrido, J. Perez y R. Barberet (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (pp. 236–246). Berlín: De Gruyter.
- Mcfatter, R. M. (1986). Sentencing disparity: perforce or perchance? Journal of applied social psychology, 16 (2), 150–164.
- Sobral, J. (1993). Sobre la disparidad de sentencias judiciales. En P. Puy (Ed.), Análisis económico del dereho y la política (pp. 101–122). Santiago de Compostela: Fundación Alfredo Brañas.
- Sobral, J. y Prieto, A. (1994). Psicología y Ley: un examen de las decisiones judiciales. Madrid: Eudema.