Publication Cover
Culture and Education
Cultura y Educación
Volume 24, 2012 - Issue 3
55
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Ayuda educativa entre iguales en tareas de escritura colaborativa on-line un estudio de las relaciones entre Presencia Docente y Presencia Cognitiva

Educational assistance among peers in on-line collaborative writing tasks: A study of the relationships between Teaching Presence and Cognitive Presence

&
Pages 337-350 | Received 30 May 2011, Accepted 24 Oct 2011, Published online: 23 Jan 2014

Referencias

  • Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R. & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchro nous Learning Networks, 5 (2), 1–18.
  • Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P. & Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17, 448–459.
  • Biggs, J. B. & Collins, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. Nueva York: Academic Press
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46
  • Coll, C., Bustos, A. & Engel, A. (2011). Perfiles de participación y presencia docente distribuida en redes asíncronas de aprendizaje: la articulación del análisis estructural y de contenido. Revista de Educación, 354, 657–688
  • Coll, C., Colomina, R., Onrubia, J. & Rochera, M. J. (1992). Actividad conjunta y habla. Una aproximación a los mecanismos de influencia educativa. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 59/60, 189–232.
  • Coll, C., De gispert, I. & Rochera, M. J. (2010). Tópicos y cadenas: una aproximación al análisis de la construcción conjunta de significados de foros de conversación en línea. Cultura y Educación, 22 (4). 439–454.
  • Coll, C., Engel, A. & Bustos, A. (2009). Distributed Teaching Presence and Participants' Activity Profiles: a theoretical approach to the structural analysis of Asynchronous Learning Networks. European Journal of Education, 44 (4), 521–538.
  • Coll, C., Onrubia, J. & Mauri, T. (2008). Ayudar a aprender en contextos educativos: el ejercicio de la influencia educativa y el análisis de la enseñanza. Revista de Educación, 346, 33–70.
  • De laat, M. F., Lally, V., Lipponen L. & Simons, P. R. J. (2007). Online teaching in networked learning communities: a multimethod approach to study the role of the teacher. Instructional Science, 35 (3), 257–286.
  • Erickson, F. (1982). Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships betwen academic task structure and social participation structure in lessonhs. En L. C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 153–182). Nueva York: Academic Press.
  • Garrison, D. R. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century. A framework for researh and practice. Londres: Routledge Falmer [El e-learning en el siglo XXI. Investigación y práctica. Barcelona: Octaedro, 2005].
  • Garrison, D. R. & Archer, W. (2000). A transactional perspective on teaching and learning: A framework for adult and higher education. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
  • Garrison, R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 11 (2), 1–14.
  • Garrison, R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Cognitive presence in Online Learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 15 (2), 30–49.
  • Green, J. L., Weade H. & Graham, K. (1988). Lesson construction and student participation: A sociolinguistic analysis. En J. L. Green & J. O. Harper (Eds.), Multiple perspective analysis of classroom discourse (pp. 11–47). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. Londres: Routledge. [Palabras y mentes. Cómo usamos el lenguaje para pensar juntos. Barcelona: Paidós, 2001].
  • Onrubia, J., Naranjo, M. & Segués, T. (2009). Debate y construcción de conocimiento en foros virtuales: la importancia de los motivos de los participantes en la actividad. Cultura y Educación, 21 (3), 275–289.
  • Reimann, P. (2009). Time is precious: variable and event —centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research. Computer supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 239–257.
  • Rochera, M. J., Mauri, T., Onrubia, J. & De gispert, I. (2010). Dimensiones para el estudio de la presencia cognitiva en foros de discusión en línea. Una aproximación individual, social y dinámica. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33 (3), 301–313.
  • Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J. & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: what are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46 (1), 29–48.
  • Yin, R. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Londres: Sage Publications.
  • Yin, R. (2006). Case Study methods. En J. L. Green, G. Camili & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research (pp. 111–122). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.