References

• Allen, M. W. (2002). Human values and product symbolism: Do consumers form product preference by comparing the human values symbolized by a product to the human values that they endorse? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2475–2501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anable, J. (2005). Complacent ‘car addicts’ or ‘aspiring environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transport Policy, 12, 65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attari, S. Z., Schoen, M., Davidson, C. I., Dekay, M. L., Bruine DE Bruin, W., Dawes, R., & Small, M. J. (2009). Preferences for change: Do individuals prefer voluntary actions, soft regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption? Ecological Economics, 68, 1701–1710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (2001). Theory-driven evaluation of an intervention to reduce the private car- use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1300–1329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilbao-Ubillos, J. (2008). The costs of urban congestion: Estimation of welfare losses arising from congestion on cross-town link roads. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42, 1098–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, S., Sloman, L., Newson, C., Anable, J., Kirkbride, A., & Goodwin, P. (2008). Smarter choices: Assessing the potential to achieve traffic reduction using ‘soft measures’. Transport Reviews, 28, 593–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2008). Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: The case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choocharukul, K., Van, H. T., & Fujii, S. (2006). Psychological determinants of moral obligation of car use reduction and acceptance of car use restriction in Japan and Thailand. IATSS Research, 30, 70–76.
   Google Scholar
• COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1999). Eurobarometer 51.1: Environmental issues and consumer associations. Brussels: Directorate General for Information, Communication, Culture and Audiovisual Media.
   Google Scholar
• COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (2009). Eurobarometer 72.1—TNS Opinion & Social. Brussels: Directorate General for Information, Communication, Culture and Audiovisual Media.
   Google Scholar
• CONCEJALÍA DE MOVILIDAD AYTO. MADRID (2000). Pacto de movilidad urbana. Retrieved on November 16, 2010, at: http://www.munimadrid.es/Principal/ayuntamiento/ServMuni/movilidad/pacto/contenido/ContenidodelPacto.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. New York: Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf, St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Domarchi, C., Tudela, A., & González, A. (2008). Effect of attitudes, habit and affective appraisal on mode choice: An application to university workers. Transportation, 35, 585–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2008). Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: The importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42, 1117–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G. W., Wener, R. E., & Phillips, D. (2002). The morning rush hour: Predictability and commuter stress. Environment and Behavior, 34, 521–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garling, T., & Schuitema, G. (2007). Travel demand management targeting reduced private car use: Effectiveness, public acceptability and political feasibility. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 139–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatersleben, B. (2007). Affective and symbolic aspects of car use. In T. Gärling & L. Steg (Eds.), Threats to the quality of urban life from car traffic: Problems, causes, and solutions (pp. 219–233). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Haustein, S., Klöckner, C A., & Blöbaum, A. (2009). Car use of young adults: The role of travel socialization. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12, 168–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunecke, H., Haustein, S., Grischkat, S., & Böhler, S. (2007). Psychological, sociodemographic, and infrastructural factors as determinants of ecological impact caused by mobility behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 277–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., & Garling, T. (2000). Determinants of private car users' acceptance of road pricing. Transport Policy, 7, 153–158.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, C., Burman, L., & Forsberg, B. (2010). The effects of congestions tax on air quality and health. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 4843–4854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., Wöelfing, S., & Führer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lois, D., & López-sáez, M. (2009). The relationship between instrumental, symbolic and affective factors as predictors of car use: A structural equation modeling approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43, 790–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möser, G., & Bamberg, S. (2008). The effectiveness of soft transport policy measures: A critical assessment and meta-analysis of empirical evidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 10–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuitema, G., Steg, L., & Forward, S. (2010). Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44, 99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiftan, Y., Outwater, M. L., & Zhou, Y. (2008). Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation. Transport Policy, 15, 186–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2006). The effectiveness of policies to address urban environmental problems: Some perceptions and realities. World Transport Policy and Practice, 12, 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2008). Effectiveness and acceptability of urban transport policies in Europe. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2, 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L. (2005). Car use: Lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39, 147–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L., & Tertoolen, G. (1999). Affective motives for car use. European Transport Conference: Transport, Planning, Policy and Practice, Cambridge, London. Stradling, S. G., Noble, A., Carreno, M., Jeffrey, G., & Marshall, I. (2004). Eight reasons people don't like buses. International Conference on Traffic & Transport Psychology, Nottingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, N., Hills, P. J., & Jaensirisak, S. (2000). Public attitudes to TDM measures: A comparative study. Journal of Transport Policy, 7, 243–257.
   Google Scholar