Technology and Tricks: Intra-Household Technology Implementation and Gender Struggles

References

• Agarwal, B. (1997) “Bargaining” and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household’, Feminist Economics 3 (1): 1-51.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, I. (1987) ‘Technology, Production Linkages and Women’s Employment in SouthAsia’, International Labour Review 126 (1): 21-40.
   Google Scholar
• Alderman, H., P.A. Chiappori, L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott and R. Kanbur. (1995) ‘Unitary versus Collective Models of the Household: Is it Time to Shift the Burden of Proof?’, World Bank Research Observer 10 (1): 1-19.
   Google Scholar
• Batliwala, S. (1982) ‘Rural Energy Scarcity and Nutrition: A New Perspective’, Economic and Political Weekly, 17 February: 329-33.
   Google Scholar
• Bayat, A. (2000) ‘From “Dangerous Classes” to “Quiet Rebels”: Politics of the Urban Subaltern in the Global South’, International Sociology 15 (3): 533-58.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, S. (1984) ‘Households, Decision-Making and Rural Development’, DevelopmentDiscussion Paper no. 167. Cambridge: Harvard University, Institute for International Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaduri, A. (1985) ‘Technological Change and Rural Women: A Conceptual Analysis’, in I. Ahmed (ed.) Technology and Rural Women: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. George Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 15-26.
   Google Scholar
• Bose, S. (1993) Money, Energy and Welfare: The State and the Household in India’s Rural Electrification Policy, Oxford University Press, Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (1985) The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes Under Capitalism and Socialism, Verso, London.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, J. and M. Watts. (1990) ‘Manufacturing Dissent: Work, Gender and the Politics of Meaning in a Peasant Society’, Africa 60 (2): 207-41.?
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M. and E. Katz. (1997) ‘Separate Spheres and the Conjugal Contract: Under-standing the Impact of Gender-Biased Development’, in L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott, and H. Alderman (eds), Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries: Methods, Models, and Policy, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 95-111.
   Google Scholar
• Cecelski, E. (1987) ‘Energy and Rural Women’s Work: Crisis, Response and Policy Alternatives’, International Labour Review 126 (1): 41-64.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, P. (1983) Rural Development: Putting the Poor First, Longman, Harlow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cline-Cole, R. A., H. A. C. Main and J. E. Nichol. (1990) ‘On Fuelwood Consumption, Population Dynamics and Deforestation in Africa’, World Development 18 (4): 513-27.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R.S. (1985) More Work for Mother, Basic, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Crew, E. (1997) ‘The Silent Tradition of Developing Cooks,’ in Grillo, R.D. and R.L. Stirrat (eds) Discourses of Development: Anthropological Perspectives, Berg, Oxford, pp. 59-80.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (1993) An Inquiry into Well Being and Destitution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Dewees, P.A. (1989) ‘The Woodfuel Crisis Reconsidered: Observations on the Dynamics of Abundance and Scarcity’, World Development 17 (8): 1159-72.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, J. (1979) ‘Women Farmers in the Gambia: The Effects of Irrigated Rice Development Programmes on Their Role in Rice Production’, unpublished paper. Oxford, Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Ezzati, M. and D. Kammen. (2001) ‘Quantifying the Effects of Exposure to Indoor Air Pollution from Biomass Combustion on Acute Respiratory Infections in Developing Countries’, Environmental Health Perspectives 109: 481-88.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. G, R. L. Warner and W. A. Masters. (2000) ‘Gender and Agricultural Change: Crop-Livestock Integration in Senegal’, Society & Natural Resources 13: 203-22. Foucault, M. (1979) Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison, Vintage, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, F. (1978) India’s Political Economy,1947-1977: The Gradual Revolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. (1989) ‘Productivity and Efficiency: Myth and Reality’, Economic and Political Weekly. 11 February: 279-81.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, J. (1987) ‘Improved Stoves in Developing Countries: A Critique’, EnergyPolicy 15 (2): 135-43.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, A.M. and R. Sengupta. (1996) ‘Who Takes the Credit? Gender, Power and Control Over Loan Use in Rural Credit Programs in Bangladesh’, World Development 24 (1): 45-63.
   Google Scholar
• Goldey, P., Le Breton, S., Martin, A. and R. Marcus. (1997) ‘Approaches to Address Gender Specific Needs in Relation to Access to Technological Change’, Agricultural Systems 55 (2): 155-72.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (2000) in D. Forgacs (ed.), The Gramsci Reader, New York University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1996) ‘On Postmodernism and Articulation: An Interview with Stuart Hall’, in D. Morsley and K.H. Chen (eds), Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G (1991) ‘Engendering Everyday Resistance: Gender, Patronage and Production Politics in Rural Malaysia’, Journal of Peasant Studies 19 (1): 93-121.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G . (1992) ‘Household Production Reconsidered: Gender, Labour Conflict, andTechnological Change in Malaysia’s Muda Region’, World Development 20 (6): 809-23.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G . (1995) ‘Gender and Household Dynamics: Recent Theories and Their Implications’, in M.G Guibria (ed.) Critical Issues in Asian Development: Theories, Experiences and Policies, Oxford University Press, Hong Kong, pp. 39-74.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. (1993) ‘Doing What Comes Naturally? Women and Environment in Development’, World Development 21 (12): 1947-63.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. (1998) ‘Rescuing Gender from the Poverty Trap’, in C. Jackson and R. Pearson (eds) Feminist Visions of Development: Gender Analysis and Policy, Routledge, New York, pp. 39-64.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1994) Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought, Verso, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1999) ‘Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement ofWomen’s Empowerment’, Development and Change 30: 435-64.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E. (1995) ‘Gender and Trade within the Household: Observations from Rural Guatemala’, World Development 23 (2): 327-42.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E. (1997) ‘The Intra-Household Economics of Voice and Exit’, Feminist Economics 3 (3): 25-46.
   Google Scholar
• Koczberski, G (1998) ‘Women in Development: A Critical Analysis’, Third WorldQuarterly 19 (3): 395-409.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, G and R. Mearns. (1988) Beyond the Fuelwood Crisis: People, Landand Trees in Africa, Earthscan Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. (1996) ‘Images of Community: Discourse and Strategy in Property Relations’, Development and Change 27: 501-27.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, S. and R.A. Pollak. (1993) ‘Separate Spheres, Bargaining and the Marriage Market’, Journal of Political Economy 101 (6): 988-1010.
   Google Scholar
• Malhans, N. and J. Sanghera. (1982) ‘Appropriate for Women, Appropriated by Men’, Manushi 12: 11-13.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1992) Space, Place, and Gender, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher, K. (1995) ‘Crisis, Informalization and the Urban Informal Sector in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Development and Change 26: 259-84.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M. (2001) ‘The Gender of the Trick: Female Tricksters and Male Narrators’, Asian Folklore Studies 60 (2): 237-58.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux, M. (1985) ‘Mobilisation without Emancipation? Women’s Interests, Stateand Revolution in Nicaragua’, Feminist Studies 11 (2): 227-54.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux, M. (1998) ‘Analysing Women’s Movements’, Development and Change 29,219-45.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, C. (1993a) Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice, and Training, Routledge, New York and London.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, C. (1993b) ‘Adjustment from Below: Low-Income Women, Time, and the TripleRole in Guayaquil, Ecuador’, in S. Radcliffe and S. Westwood (eds), Viva! Women andPopular Protest in Latin America, Routledge, London, pp. 173-96.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. (1997a) ‘The Symbolic Making of a Common Property Resource: History, Ecology and Locality in a Tank-Irrigated Landscape in South India’, Development and Change 28 (3): 467-504.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. (1997b) ‘The Ideology and Politics of Community Participation: Tank IrrigationDevelopment in Colonial and Contemporary Tamil Nadu,’ in R.L. Stirrat and R. Grillo (eds), Discourses of Development: Anthropological Perspectives, Berg, Oxford and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (1987) Spirits of Resistance and Capitalist Discipline: Factory Womenin Malaysia, State University of New York Press, Albany.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Trick’. (1989) The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed., Oxford UniversityPress, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, K.N. (2001) ‘Governing Development: Neoliberalism, Microcredit, and Rational Economic Women’, Economy and Society 30 (1): 18-37.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, A. (1999) ‘Micro-Credit Initiatives for Equitable and Sustainable Development: Who Pays?’, World Development 27 (1): 67-82.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2002a) ‘Against the Feminization of Policy,’ Woodrow Wilson Center, Urban Livelihoods Series, policy brief, November.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2002b) City Requiem, Calcutta: Gender and the Politics of Poverty, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2003) `Marketized, Feminized, Medieval? Emerging Modes of Urban Govern-ance’, in J. Tulchin (ed.), Democratic Governance and Urban Sustainability, Woodrow Wilson Center, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Sarin, M. (1986a) ‘Eager to Move Towards Freedom’, Manushi 36: 26-32.
   Google Scholar
• Sarin, M. (1986b) ‘Improved Chulha Programme: Boon or Disaster?’, Economic and Political Weekly 21(38-39): 1709-17.
   Google Scholar
• Saugeres, L. (2002) ‘Of Tractors and Men: Masculinity, Technology and Power in a French Farming Community’, Sociologia Ruralis 42 (2): 143-59.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, Yale University Press, New Haven.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, Yale University Press, New Haven.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1983) ‘Economics and the Family’, Asian Development Review 1 (2): 14-26.
   Google Scholar
• Silvey, R. (2003). ‘Engendering Social Capital: Women Workers and Rural-Urban Networks in Indonesia’s Crisis’, World Development 31 (5): 865-79.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G (1999) ‘Global Feminization through Flexible Labour: A Theme Revisited’, World Development 27 (3): 583-602.
   Google Scholar
• Sundari, S. and V. Gowri. (2002) ‘New Agricultural Technology: A Gender Analysis’, Indian Journal of Social Work 63: 517-39.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, P. (1999) ‘The Gendered Politics of Fuel in India’, Gender, Technology and Development 3 (2): 165-86.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G, R. Veron, S. Corbridge and M. Srivastava. (2003) ‘Participation and Power: Poor People’s Engagement with India’s Employment Assurance Scheme’, Development and Change 34 (1): 163-92.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1977) Marxism and Literature, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. (1985) ‘Effects of Technological Change on Rural Women: A Reviewof Analysis and Concepts’, in I. Ahmed (ed.), Technology and Rural Women: Conceptual and Empirical Issues, George Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 27-46.
   Google Scholar