Contesting Binaries: Teenage Girls as Technological Experts

References

• Abbott, P., Wallace, C., & Tyler, M. (2005). An introduction to sociology: Feminist perspectives (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aman, J.R.(1992). Gender and attitude toward computers. In C.D. Martin & E. Murchie-Beyma (Eds), In search of gender free paradigms for computer science education (pp. 33-46). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, P.C. (2003). Gender and learning style interactions in students’ computer attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28 (3), 231-44.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Beynon, J. (2002). Masculinities and culture. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brosnan, M. (1998). The impact of psychological gender, gender-related perceptions, significant others, and the introducer of technology upon computer anxiety in students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18 (1), 63-78.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, C., Bennett, D., & Honey, M. (1998). Girl games and technological desire. In J. Cassell & H. Jenkins (Eds), From barbie to mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 72-88). Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, E., & Kenway, J. (2002). Who’s afraid of a mouse?—Girls, information technology and educational pleasures. In N. Yelland & A. Rubin (Eds), Ghosts in the machine: Women’s voices in research with technology (pp. 55-69). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, T. (1997). Gender, group composition, cooperation, and self-efficacy in computer studies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15 (2), 125-35.
   Google Scholar
• Cassell, J., & Jenkins, H. (1998). Chess for girls? Feminism and computer games. In J. Cassell, & H. Jenkins (Eds), From barbie to mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 2-45). Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Chaika, M. (1995). Ethical considerations in gender-oriented entertainment technology. Crossroads: the Association for Computing Machinery Student Magazine. Retrieved October 30,2007, from http://www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds2-2/gender.html
   Google Scholar
• Christofides, E., Islam, T., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Gender stereotyping over instant messenger: The effects of gender and context. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (4), 897-901.
   Google Scholar
• Crombie, G., & Armstrong, P. (1999). Effects of classroom gender composition on adolescents’ computer-related attitudes and future intentions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20 (4), 317-27.
   Google Scholar
• de Castell, S., & Bryson, M. (1998). Retooling play: dystopia, dysphoria, and difference. In J. Cassell & H. Jenkins (Eds), From barbie to mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 232-61). Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Durndell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18 (5), 521-35.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, C. (1992). Implications of the computer culture for women of color. In C.D. Martin & E. Murchie-Beyma (Eds), In search of gender free paradigms for computer science education (pp. 57-70). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L.D. (2002). Learning by design: Environments that support girls’ learning with technology. In N. Yelland & A. Rubin (Eds), Ghosts in the machine: Women’s voices in research with technology (pp. 119-37). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R., & Sutherland, R. (2003). Screenplay: children and computing in the home. London: Routledge/Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2000). Dualisms, hierarchies and gender in engineering. Social Studies of Science, 30 (5), 759-92.
   Google Scholar
• Green, E. (2001). Technology, leisure and everyday practices. In E. Green & A. Adam (Eds), Virtual gender: Technology, consumption and identity (pp. 173-88). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, S. (1989). Pleasure, power and technology: Some Tales of gender, engineering, and the cooperative workplace. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. NewYork: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A.B., & Fraidin, S.N. (2003). Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39 (4), 355-63.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, B., & Schofield, J.W. (1998). I like computers, but many girls don’t: Gender and the sociocultural context of computing. In H. Bromley & M.W. Apple (Eds), Education, technology, power: Educational computing as a social practice (pp. 103-32). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, C.W., Fleming, J.H., & Cooper, J. (1992). Gender differences in human computer interaction. In C.D. Martin & E. Murchie-Beyma (Eds), In search of gender free paradigms for computer science education (pp. 19-32). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, L.A., Ervin, K.S., Gardner, P.D., & Schmitt, N. (2001) Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44 (516), 363-79.
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, J., de Castell, S., & Bryson, M. (2003). “Girl talk”: Gender, equity, and identity discourses in a school-based computer culture. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26 (6), 561-73. Retrieved January 24,2010, from http://educ.ubc.ca/faculty/bryson/pdf/wmst.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, J. & Rose, C.B. (2003). Women@work: Listening to gendered relations of power in teachers’ talk about new technologies. Gender and Education, 15 (2), 169-81.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N.F. (2009a). Teenage technological experts’ views of schooling. Australian Educational Researcher, 36 (1), 59-72. Retrieved January 24,2010, from http://www.aare.edu.au/aer/online/0901e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N.F. (2009b). Cyber-relations in the field of home computer use for leisure: Bourdieu and teenage technological experts. E-Learning, 6 (2), 187-97.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N.F. (2007). Teenage technological experts: Bourdieu and the performance of expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Deakin University, Geelong.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N.F., Rowan, L., & Lynch J. (2006). Constructions of gender in computer magazine advertisements: Confronting the literature. Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education, 6 (1), 1-9.
   Google Scholar
• Kadijevich, D. (2000). Gender differences in computer attitude among ninth-grade students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22 (2), 145-54.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. (1998). Video game designs by girls and boys: Variability and consistency of gender differences. In J. Cassell & H. Jenkins (Eds), From barbie to mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 90-117). Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1990). Reinscribing otherwise: The play of values in the practices of the human sciences. In E.G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 315-32). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J. (1984). Girls and computer education. Discussion Paper 3. Equal Opportunity Unit of the Victorian Education Department, Melbourne, VIC.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, G. (1993). The man of reason: ‘Male’ and female’ in Western philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lupart, J., & Cannon, E. (2002). Computers and career choices: Gender differences in grades 7 and 10 students. Gender, Technology and Development, 6 (2), 233-48.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, J. (Ed.). (2007). Gender and IT: Ongoing challenges for computing and information technology education in Australian secondary schools. Deakin West, ACT: Australian Curriculum Studies Association, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, J., Leder, G., & Forgasz, H. (2001). Mathematics: A dilemma for feminists. In E. MacNabb, M.J. Cherry, S. Popham, & R.P. Prys (Eds), Transforming the disciplines: A women’s studies primer (pp. 185-92). New York: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcelle, G.M. (2004). Thinking BIG to accelerate gender equality and transformation in the ICTs arena. Gender, Technology and Development, 8 (1), 31-52.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, M.S. (1998). Cracking the gender code: Who rules the wired world? Toronto, Ontario: Second Story Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, A., LaFrance, B., & McCullough, S. (2001). Differences in attitudes between women and men toward computerization. Journal ofEducational Computing Research, 25 (3), 227-44.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, A., Lenzmeier, S., Steffensmeier, T., Avon, R., Qu, N., & Hazen, M. (2000). Gender and computer use in an academic institution: Report from a longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23 (1), 67-84.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, H. (1997). Women and computer based technologies: A feminist perspective. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, L., & Cooper, J. (1997). Gender differences in children’s reactions to success and failure with computers. Computers in Human Behavior, /3(2), 247-67.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, R.D. (1991). In praise of difference: The emergence of a global feminism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, S.G. (2004). Gender inclusive game design: Expanding the market. Hingham, MA: Charles River Media.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2006). Exploring the ‘digital disconnect’ between net-savvy students and their schools. Learning, Media and Technology, 3/(1), 5-17.
   Google Scholar
• Sofia, Z. (1993). Whose second self? Gender and (ir)rationality in computer culture. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sofia, Z. (1998). The mythic machine: Gendered irrationalities and computer culture. InH. Bromley & KW. Apple (Eds), Education, technology, power: Educational computing as a social practice (pp. 29-52). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stepulevage, L. (2001). Gender/technology relations: Complicating the gender binary. Gender and Education, /3(3), 325-38.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, E., & Hovenden, F. (1997). How are we seen? Images of women in computing advertisements. In R. Lander & A. Adam (eds), Women in computing (pp. 60-71). Wiltshire, UK: Cromwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (1988). Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and women’s voices (pp. 41-61). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1992). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and Voices within the computer culture. In CD. Martin & E. Murchie-Beyma (Eds), In search of gender free paradigms for computer science education (pp. 113-40). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Retrieved January 24,2010, from http://www.thinkingcurriculum.com/turldePapert.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Umrani, F., & Ghadially, R. (2003). Empowering women through ICT education: Facilitating computer adoption. Gender, Technology and Development, 7 (3), 359-77.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. (2004). Techno feminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J. (1996). Shaping women’s work: Gender, employment and information technology. London: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, M. (1998). Computer advertising and the construction of gender. In H. Bromley & KW. Apple (Eds), Education, technology, power: Educational computing as a social practice (pp. 85-102). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, /3(1), 1-22.
   Google Scholar
• Woodfield, R. (2000). Women, work and computing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, S., & Littleton, K. (1999). Understanding computer game cultures: A situated approach. Information, Communication & Society, 2 (4), 566-83.
   Google Scholar
• Yelland, N. (2002). Shades of grey: Creating a vision of girls and computers. In N. Yelland, & A. Rubin (Eds), Ghosts in the machine: Women’s voices in research with technology (pp. 139-65). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar