Social and Gender Analysis in Development Practice

References

• Agarwal, Bina. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29 (10), 1623–1648.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Sara. (2001). Empowering rural women? Policies, institutions, and gen-dered outcomes in natural resource management. Development in Practice, 11 (4), 535–537.
   Google Scholar
• Alatas, Syed Farid. (2006). Alternative discourses in Asian social science: Responses to eurocentrism. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Alba, Anneli. (2000). Introduction. In P.M. Connelly, T.M. Li, M. MacDonald, & J.L. Parpart (Eds), Feminism and development: Theoretical perspectives. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre. Accessed August 2009, from http://www.idrc.ca/fr/ev-27439-201-1-DOTOPIC.html
   Google Scholar
• Alloo, Fatma, & Harcourt, Wendy. (1997). From the South to the North: Evolving perspectives on gender and poverty. Gender and Development, 5 (3), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravorty, B. (2004). Documentation of sharing of good practices in social gender analysis. Unpublished report, International Development Research Centre, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia. (1998). The space between us: Negotiating gender and national identities in conflict. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Patricia Hill. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, Patricia M., Li, Tania Murray, MacDonald, Martha, & Parpart, Jane L. (2000). Feminism and development: Theoretical perspectives. In P.M. Connelly, T.M. Li, M. MacDonald, & J.L. Parpart (Eds), Feminism and development: Theoretical perspectives. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre. Accessed August 2009, from http://www.idrc.ca/fr/ev-27444-201-1-DOTOPIC.html
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, Andrea. (2000). Making a difference? Gender and participatory devel-opment. Sussex, United Kingdom: Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwell, Linda. (2004). Mainstreaming gender: Imperatives for development studies. Africanus, 34 (1), 51-63.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Kimberley. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43 (6), 1241-1299.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, Dawn H., Gayle, Noga, & Keays, Patricia. (1998). Equality, development and peace: A global approach to feminism and the production of women’s studies. In D.H. Currie, N. Gayle, & P. Gurstein (Eds), Learning to write: Women’s studies in development (pp. 15–32). Vancouver, Canada: Collective Press.
   Google Scholar
• Do Thi Binh & Dagenais, Huguette. (2000). Natural resource management and social/gender analysis and capacity building for social/gender analysis. Unpublished paper, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• El-Bushra, Judy. (2000). Rethinking gender and development practice for the twenty-first century. Gender and Development, 8 (1), 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Fajber, Liz, & O’Manique, Erin. (2005). Strengthening gender in the ENRM pro-gram area. Unpublished report. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Farnworth, Cathy R., & Jiggins, J. (2003). Participatory plant breeding and gender analysis. Cali: Participatory Research/Gender Analysis Program.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York & London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. (1995). Just add women and stir? In Gender Working Group (Eds), Missing links: Gender equity in science and technology and devel-opment (pp. 295-307). Ottawa, London, and New York: International Development Research Centre, Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd., & UNIFEM.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Patricia. (Ed.). (2003). Women and plants: Gender relations in bio-diversity management and conservation. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, Naila. (2005). Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third Millennium Development Goal. Gender and Develop-ment, /3(1), 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, Gundren-Axeli. (2005). Race, class, gender: Reclaiming baggage in fast travelling theories. European Journal of Women’s Studies,12(3), 249–265.
   Google Scholar
• Lazreg, Marnia. (2002). Development: Feminist theory’s cul-de-sac. In K. Saunders Ed.), Feminist post-development thought (pp. 123–145). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, Leslie. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30 (3), 1771–1800.
   Google Scholar
• Mehra, Rekha, & Hill Rojas, Mary. (2008). Women, food security and agricul-ture in a global marketplace. Washington, DC, & New Delhi: International Centre for Research on Women.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Caroline. (1989). Gender planning in the Third World: Meeting practical and strategic gender needs. World Development, 17 (11), 1799–1825.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Caroline. (1993). Gender planning and development: Theory, practice andtraining. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, Maitrayee. (1995). Gender relations, development practice and “culture”. Gender and Development, 3 (1), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, Maitrayee, & Appel, Marguerite. (1998). Gender training: The sourcebook. Oxford: Oxfam, GB.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, Ruth. (2000). Moving the goalposts: Gender and globalization in the twenty-first century. Gender and Development, 8 (1), 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, Ruth. (2003). Feminist responses to economic globalization: Some examplesof past and future practice. Gender and Development,11(1), 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Plantenga, Dome. (2004). Gender, identity, and diversity: Learning from insights gained in transformative gender training. Gender and Development, 12 (1), 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, Aruna, & Kelleher, David. (2005). Is there life after gender mainstreaming? Gender and Development, /3(2), 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Resurreccion, Bernadette P., & Elmhirst, Rebecca. (Eds). (2008). Gender and natural resource management: Livelihoods, mobility, and interventions. London & Ottawa: Earthscan and International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, Pam. (1997). Women in development: A threat to liberation. In M. Rahnema & V. Bawree (Eds), The post-development reader (pp. 2/1/I 255). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Dorothy E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist socio-logy. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Dorothy E. (1997). From the margins: Women’s standpoint as a method of inquiry inthe social sciences. Gender, Technology and Development, /(1), 113–135.
   Google Scholar
• Spieldoch, Alexandra. (2007). A row to hoe: The gender impact of trade liberal-ization on our food system, agricultural markets and women’s human rights. Geneva: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• van der Hoogte, Liesbeth, & Kingma, Koos. (2004). Promoting cultural diversity and the rights of women: The dilemmas of “intersectionality” for development organizations. Gender and Development, 12 (1), 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Vernooy, Ronnie (Ed.). (2006). Social and gender analysis in natural resource management: Learning studies and lessons from Asia. New Delhi, Beijing, & Ottawa: SAGE, China Agricultural Press, & International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Vernooy, Ronnie (2010). Collaborative learning in action: Examples from naturalresource management in Asia. New Delhi & Ottawa: Foundation Books and International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Vernooy, Ronnie, & Fajber, Liz. (2004). Making gender and social analysis work for natural resource management research: An umbrella program for building researcher capacity. In InterAction-CAW and IIRR Gender mainstreaming in action: Successful innovations from Asia and the Pacific (pp. 208–223). Washington, DC, & Silang: InterAction’s Commission on the Advancement of Women and International Institute of Rural Reconstruction.
   Google Scholar
• Vernooy, Ronnie, & Zhang, Linxiu. (2006). Social and gender analysis is essential, not optional. In R. Vernooy (Ed.), Social and gender analysis in natural resource management: Learning studies and lessons from Asia (pp. 225–236). New Delhi, Beijing, & Ottawa: SAGE, China Agricultural Press, & International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Wendoh, Senorina, & Wallace, Tina. (2006). Living gender in African organizations and communities: Stories from The Gambia, Rwanda, Uganda and Zambia. London: Transform Africa.
   Google Scholar
• White, Sarah C. (1997). Men, masculinities, and the politics of development. Gender and Development, 5 (2), 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wieringa, Saskia. (1994). Women’s interests and empowerment: Gender planning reconsidered. Development and Change, 25(October), 829–850.
   Google Scholar
• Wieringa, Saskia. (1998). Rethinking gender planning: A critical discussion of the use of theconcept of gender. Gender, Technology and Development, 2 (3), 349–371.
   Google Scholar
• Ykhanbai, Hijaba, Odgerel, Tserendorj, Bulgan, Enkhbat, & Naranchimeg, Baatar. (2006). Herder women speak out: Towards more equitable co-management of grasslands and other natural resources in Mongolia. In Ronnie Vernooy (Ed.), Social and gender analysis in natural resource management: Learning studies and lessons from Asia (pp. 181–206). New Delhi, Beijing, & Ottawa: SAGE, China Agricultural Press, & International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, Nira. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, /3(3), 193–209.
   Google Scholar
• Zwarteveen, Margreet, & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth. (2001). Gender and property rights in the commons: Examples from water rights in South Asia. Agriculture and Human Values, 18 (1), 11–25.
   Google Scholar