Bridging Gender Gaps, Networking in Computer Science

References

• Acker, Joan. (1992). Gendering organizational theory. In A.J. Mills & P. Tancred (Eds), Gendering organizational analysis (pp. 248–260). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, Alison, Howcroft, Debra, & Richardson, Helen. (2004). A decade of neglect: Reflecting on gender and IS. New Technology, Work and Employment, 19 (3), 222–240.
   Google Scholar
• Adya, Monica, & Kaiser, Kate M. (2005). Early determinants of women in the IT workforce: A model of girls’ career choices. Information Technology and People, 18 (3), 230–259.
   Google Scholar
• Armaroli, Cristina, Costantini, Erica, Guerzoni, Francesca, Malacame, Carla, & Mich, Omella. (2004). Gender in information technology: Review of a men-toring initiative. In K. Morgan, C.A. Brebbia, J. Sanchez, & A. Voiskounsky (Eds), Human perspectives in the Internet society: Culture, psychology and gender (pp. 209–216). Southampton, Boston: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baugh, S. Gayle, & Sullivan, Sherry E. (2005). Mentoring and career develop-ment. Career Development International, 10 (617), 425–428.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Dorothy, Tsikalas, Kallen, Hupert, Naomi, Meade, Terri, & Honey, Margaret. (1998, September). The benefits of online mentoring for high school girls: Telementoring young women in science, engineering, and com-puting project. Retrieved January 10, 2005, from http://cct.edc.org/report.asp?id=77
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Anne-Jorunn, & Lie, Merete. (1995). Feminism and constructivism: Do artifacts have gender? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 20 (3), 332-351.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, John Seely, & Duguid, Paul. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2 (1), 40-57.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, Barry, & Feeney, Mary K. (2007). Toward a useful theory of men-toning: A conceptual analysis and critique. Administration & Society, 39 (6), 719–739.
   Google Scholar
• Camp, Tracy. (1997). The incredible shrinking pipeline. Communications of the ACM, 40 (10), 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 5/(1), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, Sara. (1993). Empowerment and mediation: A narrative perspective. Negotiation Journal, 9 (3), 245–259.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, Anne, Conlon, Tom, Jackson, Sylvia, & Welch, Dorothy. (1994). Information technology and gender. Problems and proposals. Gender and Education, 6 (1), 77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, Mark, & Araujo, Luis. (1999). Organizational learning: Current debates and opportunities. In M. Easterby-Smith, J. Burgoyne, & L. Araujo (Eds), Organizational learning and the learning organization (pp. 1–22). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, Katherine A. (1999, January). Online mentoring: A review of literature and programs. Retrieved December 20,2005, from http://www.homestead.com/prosites-ffy/files/onlinementoring.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ensher, Ellen A., Heun, Christian, & Blanchard, Anita. (2003). Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63 (2), 264–288.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). She figures 2009. Statistics and indicators on gender equality in science. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fagenson, Ellen A. (1989). The mentor advantage: Perceived career/job experi-ences of proteges versus non-proteges. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10 (4), 309–320.
   Google Scholar
• Forret, Monica, & de Janasz, Suzanne. (2005). Perceptions of an organization’s culture for work and family. Career Development International, 10 (617), 478–492.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, Silvia. (1996). Gendered organizational cultures: Narratives of women travellers in a male world. Gender, Work and Organization, 3 (4), 187–201.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, Susan, & Healy, Geraldine. (2004). Women and IT contracting work—A testing process. New Technology, Work and Employment, 19 (1), 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, Richard. (2000). To match or mis-match? The dynamics of mentoring as a route to personal and organisational learning. Career Development International, 5(4/5), 223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Julie. (1995). Transformational mentoring. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Headlam-Wells, Jenny, Gosland, Julian, & Craig, Jane. (2005). “There’s magic in the web”: e-mentoring for women’s career development. Career Development International, 10 (617), 444 /59.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, Jeff, & Parkin, P. Wendy (1992). Gender and organizations: A selective review and a critique of a neglected area. In A.J. Mills & P. Tancred (Eds), Gendering organizational analysis (pp. 46–66). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hermanussen, Ria, & Booy, Cornelia. (2002). Equal opportunity in higher technical education: Past, present and future. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18 (4), 452–457.
   Google Scholar
• Hosking, Dian Marie, & Bowen, Rene. (2000). Organizational learning: Relational-constructivist approaches: An overview. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology, 9 (2), 129-132.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, David Marshall, & Michael, Carol. (1983). Mentorship: A career training and development tool. Academy of Management Review, 8 (3), 475-485.
   Google Scholar
• Hupert, Naomi. (2000, June). Telementoring: Using online communication for a student mentoring project. Retrieved December 15,2005, from http://www.techleaming.com/db_area/archives/WCE/archives/hupert2.htm
   Google Scholar
• James, Camille H., & Minnis, William C. (2004). Organizational storytelling: It makes sense. Business Horizons, 47 (4), 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, Sue Curry. (1989). Gender and information society: A socially structured silence. Journal of Communication, 39 (3), 196-215.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, Rosabeth M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kiopa, Agrita, Melkers, Julia, & Tanyildiz, Zeynep Esra. (2009). Women in academic science: Mentors and career development. In K. PrpiC, L. Oliveira, & S. Hemlin (Eds), Women in science & technology (pp. 55-84). Zagreb: Institute for Social Research, Sociology of Science and Technology Network of the European Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Knouse, Stephen B. (2001). Virtual mentors: Mentoring on the Internet. Journal of Employment Counseling, 38 (4), 162–169.
   Google Scholar
• Kolding, Marianne, & Milroy, Andrew. (2001, November). The networking skill shortage. How women can narrow the gap. Retrieved December 12,2004, from http://www.cisco.com/global/NL/news/pdf/women_networking.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kram, Kathy E. (1980). Mentoring processes at work: Developmental relationships in managerial careers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Kram, Kathy E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of ManagementJournal, 26 (4), 608–625.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean, & Wenger, Etienne. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath Cohoon, Joanne. (2001). Toward improving female retention in com-puter science. Communications of the ACM, 44 (5), 108-114.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, Steven. (2006). Hard drives and glass ceilings. Gender & Society, 20 (2), 207–235.
   Google Scholar
• Megginson, David. (2000). Current issues in mentoring. Career Development International, 5(4/5), 256–260.
   Google Scholar
• Mellström, Ulf. (2002). Patriarchal machines and masculine embodiment. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27 (4), 460–478.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Jennifer. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Noe, Raymond A. (1988). Women and management: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 13 (1), 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• North, Alice S., & Noyes, Jan M. (2002). Gender influences on children’s computer attitudes and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 18 (2), 135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoom, Nelly, Rommes, Els, & Stienstra, Marcelle. (2004). Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and design cultures in information and com-munication technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29 (1), 30–63.
   Google Scholar
• Palomba, Rossella (Ed.). (2000). Figlie di Minerva. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Prpic, Katarina, Oliveira, Luisa, & Hemlin, Sven (Eds). (2009). Women in science & technology. Zagreb: Institute for Social Research, Sociology of Science and Technology Network of the European Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ragins, Belle Rose. (1989). Barriers to mentoring: The female manager’s dilemma. Human Relations, 42 (1), 1-22.
   Google Scholar
• Scandura, Terri A., & Williams, Ethlyn A. (2001). An investigation of the mod-erating of gender on the relationships between mentorship initiation and protégé perceptions of mentoring functions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59 (3), 342–363.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Phyllis, & Morahan-Martin, Janet. (2001). Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17 (1), 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Sosik, John J., & Godshalk, Veronica M. (2000). The role of gender in mentor-ing: Implications for diversified and homogeneous mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57 (1), 102–122.
   Google Scholar
• Steinke, Jocelyn. (1999). Women scientist role models on screen. Science Communication, 21 (2), 111–136.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, Paula E., & Levin, Sharon G. (2005). Leaving careers in IT: Gender differences in retention. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30 (4), 383–396.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, Camilla. (1993). Reflections on the role of personal narrative in social science. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 18 (2), 408/25.
   Google Scholar
• Terlecki, Melissa S., & Newcombe, Nora S. (2005). How important is the digital divide? The relation of computer and videogame usage to gender differences in mental rotation ability. Sex Roles, 53(5/6), 433–441.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2002). E-commerce and development report. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• University of Victoria. (2003, June). Mentoring at the beginning. Retrieved December 9, 2005, from http://web.uvic.ca/equity/training/mentoring/Begin1lwork.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath, & Morris, Michael G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24 (1), 115–139.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, Judy. (2000). Reflections on gender and technology studies. Social Studies of Science, 30 (3), 447–464.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, Judy. (2004). Techno feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Fiona. (2003). Can compute, won’t compute: Women’s participation in the culture of computing. New Technology, Work and Employment, 18 (2), 127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Zorn, Isabel. (2004). Vifu: Virtual community building for networking among women. Gender, Technology and Development, 8 (1), 75–95.
   Google Scholar