Rethinking Game-based Learning from a Gender Perspective: A Case Study of a Male English Language Learner in China

References

• Abbiss, J. (2008). Rethinking the “problem” of gender and IT schooling: Dis-courses in literature. Gender and Education, 20 (2), 153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Lankshear, C., Timms, C., & Courtney, L. (2008). “Because it’s boring, irrelevant and I don’t like computers”: Why high school girls avoid professionally-oriented ICT subjects. Computers & Education, 50 (4), 1304–1318.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, E., & Connolly, T. (2008). Games for learning: Does gender make a ference? Paper presented at the 2nd European Conference on Games Based Learning, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V, & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bryce, J., Rutter, J., & Sullivan, C. (2006). Digital games and gender. In J. Rutter & J. Bryce (Eds), Understanding digital games (pp. 185–204). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Performative acts and gender constitution. In S. Case (Ed.), Performing feminisms: Feminist critical theory and theatre (pp. 270–282). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, D. (2006). Games and gender. In D. Carr, D. Buckingham, A. Bum, & C. Schott (Eds), Computer games: Text, narrative and play (pp. 162–178). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.-W. (2005). Perception of university faculty and adult students on online games: A q-methodology study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, US.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R.W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K., Groundwater-Smith, S., & Milian, M. (1990). Gender and the evolution of computer literacy. A report prepared for the NSW Ministry of Education. Erskinville, New South Wales: Department of School Education.
   Google Scholar
• Culley, L. (1993). Gender equity and computing in secondary schools: Issues and strategies for teachers. In J. Beynon & H. Mackay (Eds), Computers into classrooms: More questions than answers (pp. 147–159). London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1998). The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R., & Sutherland, R. (2003). Screenplay: Children and computing in the home. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Flax, J. (1987). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12 (4), 621–643.
   Google Scholar
• Foreman, J. (2004). Game-based learning: How to delight and instruct in the 21st century. EDUCA USE Review, 39 (5), 50–66.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditionalschooling. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P. (2006). Why game studies now? Video games: A new art form. Gamesand Culture, /(1), 58–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P. (2007). Good video games + good learning: Collected essays on videogames, learning and literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S.G. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Klimmt, C. (2008). Gender and computer games: Exploring females’ dislikes. Paper presented at the the annual meeting of the Inter-national Communication Association. Retrieved April 22,2008, from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p13951_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N.F. (2009). Contesting binaries: Teenage girls as technological experts. Gender, Technology and Development, /3(3), 365–383.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J.C. (1984). Typicality and the case study. In R.F. Ellen (Ed.), Ethno-graphic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 238–241). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, C. (2005). The uses of literacy in studying computer games: Comparing students’ oral and visual representations of games. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4 (1), 40–59.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based leraning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2006). “Don’t bother me Mom, I’m learning!”: How computer and video games are preparing your kids for twenty-first century success—and how you can help! (1st ed.). St Paul, MN: Paragon House.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J. (2006). Gender and technology: What the research tells us. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds), The SAGE handbook of gender and education (pp. 307–324). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, K. (2002). Cultural framing of computer/video games. The International Journal of Computer Game Research, 2 (1). Retrieved June 20,2011, from http://www.gamestudies.org/0102/squire/
   Google Scholar
• Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson-Keenan, J., Solsken, J.W., & Willett, J. (1998). “Only boys can jump high”: Reconstructing gender relations in a first-second grade classroom. In B. Kamler (Ed.), Constructing gender and difference: Critical research perspectives on early children (pp. 33–70). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (1997). Gender and discourse. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar