Microcredit and Women’s Agency: A Comparative Perspective across Socioreligious Communities in West Bengal, India

References

• Ackerly, B.A. (1995). Testing the tools of development: Credit programmes, loan involvement and women’s empowerment. IDS Bulletin, 26(3), 56–58.
   Google Scholar
• Aghion, de A., & Morduch, J. (2000). Micro finance beyond group lending. The Economics of Transition, 8 (2), 401–420.
   Google Scholar
• Ahamed, I. (1973). Caste and social stratification among Muslims in India. New Delhi: Manohar Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. (1994). Afield of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the house-hold (IFPRI FCND Discussion Paper No. 27). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, S., & Pebley, A.R. (1994). Gender inequality within households: The impact of a women’s development program in 36 Bangladeshi villages. Bangladesh Development Studies, 22(2&3), 121–154.
   Google Scholar
• Arohon Trust. (2010). Baseline study for special SGSY project for Gumla district, Jharkhand. Retrieved on April 19,2011, from http://splsgsyjhar.net/Project_Baseline/Gumlegumlabaseline.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, Nirmala, & Sen, Joyanti. (2003). Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana: A budgetary policy in working. New Delhi: United Nation Development Fund for Women.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, J. (2008, December 19). Self help group and capability enhancement: A study in two selected districts in West Bengal. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Jadavpur University, India.
   Google Scholar
• Bound, J., Jaeger, D.A., & Baker, R. (1993). The cure can be worse than the disease: A cautionary tale regarding instrumental variables (Technical Paper No. 137). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
   Google Scholar
• Deshmukh-Ranadive, J. (2003). Placing gender equity in the family centre stage: Use of “Kala Jatha” theatre. Economic and Political Weekly, 38 (7), 1674–1679.
   Google Scholar
• Field, Erica, Jayachandran, Seema, & Pande, Rohini. (2010). Do traditional institutions constrain female entrepreneurship? A field experiment on business training in India (Working Paper Series No. 36). IFMR Research, Centre for Micro Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, A.M., & Sengupta, R. (1996). Who takes the credit? Gender power and control over loan use in rural credit programmes in Bangladesh. World Development, 24 (1), 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• EKATRA. (2007). Evaluation of SGSY in selected blocks of Madhya Pradesh. Prepared by EKATRA, Sponsored by Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi. Retrieved on April 19,2011, from http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/peoreport/cmpdmpeo/volume1/134.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holvoet, N. (2005). The impact of microfinance on decision-making agency: Evidence from South India. Development and Change, 36 (1), 75–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1995). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measure-ment of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30 (3), 435–464.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (2001). Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh. World Development, 29 (1), 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kazi, Seema (1999). Muslim women in India. London: Minority Right Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kundu, A. (2008). Impact of SGSY scheme on self help group members in West Bengal. African Journal of Rural Development, 41 (2), 83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McElroy, M. (1992). The policy implications of family bargaining and mar-riage markets. In L. Hadad, J. Hoddinot, & H. Aldermen (Eds), Infra household resource allocation in developing countries: Method, model policy (pp. 53–74). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mencher, Joan P. (1988). Women’s work and poverty: Women’s contribution to household maintenance in South India. In Daisy Dwyer & Judith Bruce (Eds), A home divided: Women and income in the Third World. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohon, V. (2009). Political participation of Muslim women in India. Mumbai: Institute of Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution.
   Google Scholar
• Pathak, D.C., & Pant, S.K. (2010). Micro finance matters? Impact Evaluation of SGSY: A Case Study of Jaunpur District. Retrieved on April 19,2011, from http://www.igidr.ac.in/.../DC%20Pathak_SK%Pant_submission_61.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rahaman, R.I. (1986). Impact of Grameen Bank on the situation of poor rural women (BIDS Working Paper No. 1). Dhaka, Bangladesh: BIDS.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, S.R., & Hashemi, S.M. (1994). Credit programmes, women’s empower-ment, and contraception. Demography, 38 (2), 267–282.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, R.S., Hashemi, S.M., & Badal, S.H. (1998). Men’s violence against women in rural Bangladesh: Undermined or exacerbated by microcredit pro-grammes? Development in Practice, 8 (2), 148–157.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, F., Amin, S., & Naved, R.T. (2001). Savings/credit group formation and change in empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development, 24 (4), 635–653.
   Google Scholar
• Stolzenberg, R.M., & Relies, D.A. (1997). Tools for intuition about sample selec-tion bias and its correction. American Sociological Review, 62 (3): 494–507.
   Google Scholar
• Sud, Nikita. (2003). Experience of SGSY in Gujarat: From process oriented theory to deterministic practice. Economic and Political Weekly, 38 (39), 4085–4087.
   Google Scholar
• Wagha, B.R., & Gaikwad, J.H. (2008). Impact of Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojona (SGSY) on the socioeconomic status of beneficiaries and their sug-gestions from Maharashtra. Agricultural Update, 3 (4), 266–268.
   Google Scholar