Intrahousehold Bargaining and Distributional Outcomes Regarding NERICA Upland Rice Proceeds in Hoima District, Uganda

References

• Afedraru, L. (2010, July 20). Uganda receives USD 6 million for improved rice production. Daily Monitor, Uganda. Retrieved August 31, 2012, from http://www.monitor.co.ug/Business/Business%20Power/4688616/960688/4lmbfg3/-/index.html
   Google Scholar
• African Development Fund. (2005). Uganda. Multi-sector country gender profile. Agriculture and rural development. North East and South region. Report No. ADF/BD/IF/2005/06. Retrieved December 9, 2009, from http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Project-and-Operations/UG-gender-profile.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Africa Rice Center (WARDA), FAO, & SAA (2008). NERICA®: The new rice for Africa—A compendium (2008 ed., E.A. Somado, R.G. Guei, & S.O. Keya, Eds). Cotonou: Africa Rice Center.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. (1985). Women and technological change in agriculture: The Asian and African experience. In I. Ahmed (Ed.), Technology and rural women: Conceptual and empirical issues (pp. 67–114). London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. (1997). “Bargaining” and gender relations: Within and beyond thehousehold. Feminist Economics, 3 (1), 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ahikire, J. (2000). Gender and poverty in Uganda today. In SAP project. Nkozi: Uganda Martyrs University. Retrieved July 14, 2011, from http://www.fiuc.orghaup/esap/publications/umu/umusca/Genpov.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa (ASARECA). (2009). Best-bets research outputs: Three commercial upland rice varieties (NERICA-1, NERICA-10 and NERICA-4) for uptake by farmers. Retrieved July 14, 2011, from http://www.asareca.org/tuusi/index.php?option=comtuusiviewbestpractice&act=view&Itemid=42&project=31
   Google Scholar
• Bergman Lodin, J. (2005). The NERICA conundrum—From rice to riches? Experiences of the new rice for Africa. Report from a minor field study, Hoima district, Uganda, February-April 2005. Unpublished Bachelor’s thesis in Development Studies, Lund University, Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman Lodin, J., Jirstrom, M., & Paulson, S. (2011). The new rice for Africa—A new commercial opportunity for female-headed households. An investigation into the gendered production—Marketing continuum of NERICA in Hoima district, Uganda. Manuscript under review, available from author.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman Lodin, J., Paulson, S., & Mugenyi, M.S. (2012). New seeds, gender norms and labor dynamics in Hoima district, Uganda. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 6 (3), 405–422.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, J., & Watts, M. (1991). Disciplining women? Rice, mechanization and the evolution of Mandinka gender relations in Senegambia. Signs,16(4), 651–681.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M.R., & Katz, E.G. (1997). Separate spheres and the conjugal contract: Understanding the impact of gender-biased development. In L. Haddad, J.Hoddinott, & H. Alderman (Eds), Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Models, methods, and policy (pp. 95–111). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London: ITDG Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, J. (1985). Women in African rice farming systems. In IRRI (Ed.), Women in rice farming: Proceedings of a conference on women in rice farming systems, IRRI, Manila, Sept 26-30,1983 (pp. 419-444). Aldershot: Gower Publishing Company Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Doss, C.R. (2001). Designing agricultural technology for African women farmers: Lessons from 25 years of experience. World Development, 29 (12), 2075–2092.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, H. (2000). Focusing on sex: Using focus groups in sex research. Sexualities, 3 (3), 275–297.
   Google Scholar
• Hazell, P., & Haddad, L. (2001, August). Agricultural research and poverty reduction. A 2020 vision forfood, agriculture, and the environment discussion paper 34. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Technical Advisory Committee of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. Paper prepared for the IFPRI 2020 Conference on Sustainable Food Security for All by 2020, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (1998). Agricultural implements used by women farmers in Africa. Rome: WAD. Retrieved August 28,2009, from http://www.ifad.org/pub/other/!ifadaffpdf
   Google Scholar
• International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)(2000a). Uganda: Division of labour in agriculture. Retrieved December7,2009, from http://www.ifad.org/gender/learning/role/labour/54.htm
   Google Scholar
• International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)(2000b). Uganda: Gender differences in control over and use of income.Retrieved January 21,2011, from http://www.ifad.org/gender/learning/sector/agriculture/51.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. (1998). Women and poverty or gender and well-being? Journal of International Affairs, 52 (1), 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C., & Palmer-Jones, R. (1999). Rethinking gendered poverty and work. Development and Change, 30 (3), 557–583.
   Google Scholar
• Japan International Cooperation Agency/Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (JICA/AGRA). (2008). Coalition for African rice development. CARD. Retrieved February 27, 2011, from http://www.jica.go.jp/english/operations/thematicissues/agricultural/pdf/card02en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1991). Gender; production and well-being: Rethinking the household economy (IDS Discussion Paper). Brighton: University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kasente, D., Lockwood, M., Vivian, J., & Whitehead, A. (2000). Gender and the expansion of non-traditional agricultural exports in Uganda (Occasional Paper 12). Geneva: UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• Kijima, Y, Otsuka, K., & Sserunkuuma, D. (2008). Assessing the impact of NERICA on income and poverty in central and western Uganda. Agricultural Economics,38(3), 327–337.
   Google Scholar
• Kijima, Y, Sserunkuuma, D., & Otsuka, K. (2006). How revolutionary is the “NERICA revolution”? Evidence from Uganda. The Development Economies, XLIV-2, 252–267.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness,16(1), 103–121.
   Google Scholar
• Mabsout, R., & van Staveren, I. (2010). Disentangling bargaining power from individual and household level to institutions: Evidence of women’s position in Ethiopia. World Development,38(5), 783–796.
   Google Scholar
• Maseruka, J., & Kalyango, R. (2010, July 6). Uganda tops upland rice growing. New Vision, Uganda. Retrieved August 31,2012, from http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/12/724979
   Google Scholar
• MoFPED (2006). Gender inequality in Uganda: The status, causes and effects (Discussion Paper 11). Kampala: Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development.
   Google Scholar
• Mohapatra, S. (2009). Uganda’s rice revolution. Rice Today,8(3), 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Oyewumi, O. (1998). De-confounding gender: Feminist theorizing and Western culture, a comment on Hawkesworth’s “Confounding gender.” Signs,23(4), 1049–1062.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, T. (1998). Technology and policy needs of poor women in Asian farming. Gender, Technology and Development, 2 (2), 187–218.
   Google Scholar
• Quisumbing, A. (1995). Gender differences in agricultural productivity (IFPRI, FCND Discussion Paper No. 5). Retrieved April 19, 2009, from http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/dp05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Quisumbing, A., & Pandolfelli, L. (2010). Promising approaches to address the needs of poor female farmers: Resources, constraints, and interventions. World Development, 38 (4), 581–592.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1990). Gender and cooperative conflicts. In I. Tinker (Ed.), Persistent inequalities: Women and world development (pp. 123–149). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. (1981). I’m hungry, mum: The politics of domestic budgeting. In K. Young, C. Wolkowitz, & R. McCullagh (Eds), Of marriage and the market (pp. 89–111). London: CSE Books.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. (1990). Rural women and food production in sub-Saharan Africa. InJ. Dreze & A.K. Sen (Eds), The political economy of hunger Volume 1: Entitlement and well-being (pp. 425-473). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. (1994). Wives and mothers: Female farmers in Africa. In A. Adepoju& C. Oppong (Eds), Gender; work & population in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 35–53). London: James Currey Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2001). Engendering development. Through gender equality in rights, resources and voice. A World Bank Policy Research Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar