Gender, Mobility, and Citizenship Rights among Tribals of Khurda and Sundargarh, Odisha (India)

References

• Ambagudia, Jagannath. (2010). Tribal rights, dispossession and the state in Orissa. Economic and Political Weekly, 24 (33), 60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Chari, Anurekha. (2009). Gendered citizenship and women’s movement. Economic and Political Weekly, 44 (17), 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2011). The vagrant/vagabond: The curious career of a mobile subject.In T. Cresswell & P. Merriman (Eds), Geographies of mobilities: Practices, spaces, subjects (pp. 239-254). Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Das, Achyut, & Das, Vidhya. (2009). Tribal self-governance: A reality check. International Seminar on “Adivasi Communities in India: Development and Change.” Seminar Papers, Institute for Human Development (I-TD), August 27-29,2009, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Krishna, Sumi (Ed.). (2007). Women’s livelihood rights. Recasting citizenship for development. New Delhi: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnaraj, Maitreyee. (2009). Women’s citizenship and the private-public dichotomy. Economic and Political Weekly,44 (17), 43–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kujur, J.M., & Jha, Vikas. (2008). Tribal women domestic workers in Delhi. New Delhi: Indian Social Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W., & Wayne, N. (1994). Return of the citizen: A survey of the recent work on citizenship theory. Ethics,194 (2), 353–382.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, Ragnhild, & Panda, Smita M. (2011). New activism for political recognition: Creation and expansion of spaces by tribal women in Odisha. Gender, Technology and Development, 15 (1), 75–99.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, R. (forthcoming). Gender mobilities and livelihoods transformation: An introduction. In R. Lund, K. Kusakabe, S.M. Panda, & W. Yunxian (Eds), Gender, mobilities and livelihood transformation: Comparing indigenous people in China, India and Laos. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, Arvind, Naryanan, B., Kumar, Sanjay, & Ahmed, R. (2010). Representation, resistance, and identity: The Musahars of the middle Gangetic plain. In Frederique Apffel-Marglin, Sanjay Kumar, & Arvind Mishra (Eds), Interrogating development: Insights from the margins (pp. 150–171). New Delhi: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, B.S. (2007). Silenced drums and unquiet woods: The myth of modernisation and development in Orissa. Journal of Social Welfare, 23 (1), 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Padel, Felix, & Das, Samarendra. (2010). Out of this earth: East India adivasis and the aluminum cartel. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
   Google Scholar
• Panda, Smita M. (1996). Forest degradation, changing livelihoods and gender relations: Study of two tribal communities in Orissa, India. Unpublished dissertation. Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Rigg, J. (2007). Moving lives: Migration and livelihoods in Lao PDR. Population, Space and Place, 13 (3), 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, Anupama. (2005). Gendered citizenship: Historical and conceptual explorations. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, Anupama. (2009). Listening to the grasshoppers: Field notes on democracy. NewDelhi: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sahoo, Sarbeswar. (2006). Civil society, citizenship and subaltern counterpublics in post-colonial India. In Ajaya K. Sahoo (Ed.), Sociological perspectives on globalisation (pp. 57–88). Delhi: Kalpaz Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Stepputat, F., & Sorensen, N.N. (1999). Negotiating movement. In N.N. Sorensen (Ed.), Narrating mobility, boundaries and belonging. Working Paper No. 99.7 (pp. 85-109). Copenhagen: Centre for Development Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stepputat, F., & Sorensen, N.N. (2001). The rise and fall of ‘Internally Displaced’ in the central PeruvianAndes. Development and Change, 32,769–791.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M. (1989). Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics, 99 (2), 250–274.
   Google Scholar