273
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Negotiating Women’s Agency through ICTs: A Comparative Study of Uganda and India

&

References

  • Adamu L. (2004). My wife’s tongue delivers more punishing blows than Muhammed Ali’s fist: Bargaining power in Nigerian Hausa society. In A. Boran & B. Murphy (Eds), Issues in the social sciences: Series 2. Gender in flux. Chester: University of Chester.
  • Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3 (1), 1–51.
  • Azari, F. (1983). Women of Iran: The conflict with fundamentalist Islam. London: Ithaca Press.
  • Bailur, S., & Masiero, S. (2012). The complex position of the intermediary in telecenters and community multimedia centers. Information Technologies & International Development, 8 (1), 1–27.
  • Bruckner, D.W. (2009). In defense of adaptive preferences. Philosophical Studies, 142 (3), 307–324.
  • Buskens, I., & Webb, A. (Eds). (2009). African women and ICTs: Investigating technology, gender and empowerment. London and New York/Ottawa, Cairo, Dakar, Montevideo, Nairobi, New Delhi and Singapore: Zed/IDRC.
  • Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Carrasco, J., Hogan, B., Wellman, B., & Miller, E. (2008). Agency in social activity interactions: The role of social networks in time and space. Journal of Economic and Social Geography [Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie], 99 (5), 562–583.
  • Chew, H., Levy, M., & Ilavarasan, V. (2011). The limited impact of ICTs on microenterprise growth: A study of businesses owned by women in urban India. Information Technologies & International Development, 7 (4), 1–16.
  • Chib, A., & Chen, V. (2011). Midwives with mobiles: A dialectical perspective on gender arising from technology introduction in rural Indonesia. New Media Society, 13 (3), 486–501.
  • Choudhury, N. (2009). The question of empowerment: Women’s perspectives on their internet use. Gender; Technology and Development, 13 (3), 341–363.
  • Clandinin, J., & Connelly, M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story inqualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Cornwall, A., & Edwards, J. (2010). Introduction: Negotiating empowerment. IDS Bulletin, 41 (2), 1–9.
  • De Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
  • Elnaggar, A. (2008). Towards gender equal access to ICT. Information Technology for Development, 14 (4), 280–293.
  • Elster, J. (1985). Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion ofrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Flax, J. (1987). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs, 12 (4), 621–643.
  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.
  • Garcia, O. (2011). Gender digital divide: The role of mobile phones among Latina farm workers in Southeast Ohio. Gender, Technology and Development, 15 (1), 53-74.
  • Gill, K., Brooks, K., McDougall, J., Patel, P., & Kes, A. (2010). Bridging the gender divide: How technology can advance women economically. Washington, DC: ICRW.
  • Grint, Keith. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of “leadership”. Human Relations, 58 (11), 1467–1494.
  • Hijazi-Omari, H., & Ribak, R. (2008). Playing with fire. On the domestication of the mobile phone among Palestinian teenage girls in Israel. Information Communication and Society, 11 (2), 149–166.
  • Horst, H., & Miller, D. (2005). From kinship to link up: Cell phones and social networking in Jamaica. Current Anthropology, 46 (5), 755–778.
  • Ibrahim, S., & Alkire, S. (2007). Agency and empowerment: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators. Oxford Development Studies, 35 (4), 379–403.
  • Jagun, A., Heeks, R., & Whalley, J. (2008). The impact of mobile telephony on developing country enterprise: A Nigerian case study. Information Technologies and International Development, 4 (4), 47–65.
  • Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency and achievements: Reflections on the measurement of empowerment. Development and Change, 30 (3), 435–464.
  • Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysisof the third millennium development goal 1. Gender & Development, 13 (1), 13–24.
  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2 (3), 274–290.
  • Kandiyoti, D. (1998). Gender, power and contestation: Rethinking bargaining withpatriarchy. In C. Jackson & R. Pearson (Eds), Feminist visions ofdevelopment: Gender analysis and policy (pp. 135–152). London: Routledge.
  • Khader, S.J. (2009). Adaptive preferences and procedural autonomy. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10 (2), 169–187.
  • Khader, S.J. (2011). Adaptive preferences and women’s empowerment. New York:
  • Oxford University Press.
  • Khader, S.J. (2012). Must theorizing about adaptive preference deny women’sagency. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 29 (4), 302–317.
  • Lemish, D., & Cohen, A. (2005). On the gendered nature of mobile phone culture in Israel. Sex Roles, 52 (7-8),511–521.
  • Ling, R., & Horst, H. (2011). Mobile communication in the global south. New Media & Society, 13 (3), 363–374.
  • Lister, R. (2004). Poverty. Bristol: Polity Press.
  • Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2011). Mobile phone parenting: Reconfiguring relationships between Filipina migrant mothers and their left behind children. New Media & Society, /3(3), 457–470.
  • Madon, S. (2007). Telecentres and development: A social space approach (VVorking Paper Series Number 164). LSE Information Systems and Innovation Group. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://www.lse.ac.uk/management/documents/isig-wp/ISIG-WP-164.PDF
  • Masiero, S. (2011). Financial vs. social sustainability of telecentres: Mutual exclusion or mutual reinforcement? The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 45 (3), 1–23.
  • Molyneux, M. (2008). Conditional cash transfers: A pathway to women’s empowerment. Pathways (VVorking Paper 5). Brighton, UK: Pathways to Empowerment.
  • Murphy, L., & Priebe, A. (2011). My co-wife can borrow my mobile phone! Gendered geographies of cell phone usage and significance for rural Kenyans. Gender, Technology and Development, 15 (1), 1–23.
  • Nair, S., Jennaway, M., & Skuse, A. (2006). Local information networks: Social and technological considerations. New Delhi: UNESCO.
  • Nussbaum, M.C. (2001). Symposium on Amartya Sen’s philosophy: 5 Adaptive preferences and women’s options. Economics and Philosophy, 17 (1), 67–88.
  • Overk R. (2008). Mobile traders and mobile phones in Ghana. In J. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 43–54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pavarala, V, & Malik, K.K. (2007). Other voices: The struggle for community radio in India. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
  • Peter, F. (2003). Gender and the foundations of social choice: The role of situated agency. Feminist Economics, 9 (2-3), 13–32.
  • Rakow, L., & Navarro, V. (1993). Remote mothering and the parallel shift: Women meet the cellular phone. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10(Winter), 144–157.
  • Rowlands, J. (1995). Empowerment examined. Development in Practice, 5 (2), 101–107.
  • Scott, J.C. (2008). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale: Yale University Press.
  • Sen, A.K. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.
  • Slater, D., & Tacchi, J. (2004). Research: ICT innovations for poverty reduction. New Delhi: UNESCO.
  • Stewart, J. (2004). Gender as a factor in the uptake and use of ICTs on family farms in southern Queensland, Southern Australia. Gender Technology and Development, 8 (1), 97–117.
  • Tacchi, J., Watkins, J., & Keerthirathne, K. (2009). Participatory content creation: Voice, communication, and development. Development in Practice, 19 (4-5), 573–584.
  • Tamboukou, M. (2008). A Foucauldian approach to narratives. In M. Andrews, C. Squire, & M. Tamboukou (Eds), Doing narrative research. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, and Singapore: SAGE Publications.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2012). Mobile technologies and empowerment: Enhancing human development through participation and innovation. New York: UNDP.
  • United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (UNDAW). (2002, November). Information and communication technologies and their impact on and use as an instrument for the advancement and empowerment of women. Report of the Expert Group Meeting, Republic of Korea, Seoul.
  • Wakunuma, K. (2013). Mobiles for development in Africa: Are we in danger of losing sight of the bigger picture. Feminist Africa,18, 131-129. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://agi.ac.za/sites/agi.ac.za/files/fal8web-1.pdffipage=139
  • Wallis, C. (2011). Mobile phones without guarantees: The promises of technology and the contingencies of culture. New Media and Society, 13 (3), 471–485.
  • Williams, A., Wallis, J., & Williams, P. (2013). Emirati women and public sector employment: The implicit patriarchal bargain. International Journal of Public Administration, 36 (2), 137–149.
  • World Bank. (2006). ICT and gender equality. Gender and Development Briefing Notes. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.