Amplifying Outcomes by Addressing Inequality: The Role of Gender-transformative Approaches in Agricultural Research for Development

References

• Apgar, M., & Douthwaite, B. (2013). Participatory action research in the CGIAR research program on aquatic agricultural systems. (Program Brief AAS-2013-27). Penang: AAS.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organisational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Baden, S. (2013). Women’s collective action in agricultural markets: The limits of current development practice for rural women’s empowerment. Gender and Development,21(2), 295–311.
   Google Scholar
• Boserup, E. (1970). Woman’s role in economic development. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S.D. (2000). Transformative learning as ideology critique. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 125–148). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chant, S., & Sweetman, C. (2012). Fixing women or fixing the world? “Smart economics,” efficiency approaches, and gender equality in development. Gender and Development,20(3), 517–529.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S.M., Kantor, P., Sarapura, S., & Rajaratnam, S. (2014). Gender-transformative approaches to address inequalities in food, nutrition and economic outcomes in aquatic agricultural systems (Working Paper: AAS 2014-42). Penang, Malaysia: CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., Harrison, E., & Whitehead, A. (2007). Gender myths and feminist fables: The struggle for interpretive power in gender and development. Development and Change,38(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• De Soysa, I., & Jutting, J. (2007). Informal institutions and development: How they matter and what makes them change. In J. Jutting, D. Drechsler, S. Bartsch, & I. de Soysa (Eds), Informal institutions: How social norms help or hinder development (pp. 29–43). Paris: OECD Development Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Eyben, R., & Napier-Moore, R. (2009). Choosing words with care? Shifting meanings of women’s empowerment in international development. Third World Quarterly,30(2), 285–300.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2010). The state of food and agriculture: Women in agriculture: Closing the gender gap for development. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems. (2012). Gender strategy brief-A Gender transformative approach to research in development in aquatic agricultural systems (AAS 2012-03a). Penang, Malaysia: CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Friis-Hansen, E., Duveskog, D., & Taylor, E. (2012). Less noise in the household: The impact of farmer field schools on gender relations. J Res Peace Gender Dev,2, 44–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R., Heemskerk, W., Booth, R., Dame, J., Maatman, A., & Adekunle, A.A. (2009). Integrated agricultural research for development (IAR4D): A concept paper for the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA) Sub-Saharan Africa Challenge Programme (SSA CP). Accra, Ghana: FARA. 92 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, S., & du Toit, A. (2007). Adverse incorporation, social exclusion and chronic poverty (Working Paper 81). Manchester: Chronic Poverty Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, Classen, S.L., Jimenez, J., Sierra, F., Gallardo, O., & Gomes, M. (2012). Opening cracks for the transgression of social boundaries: An evaluation of the gender impacts of farmer research teams in Honduras. World Development,40, 2078-2095.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C.W. (1986). Intra-household bargaining in response to the introduction of new crops: A case study from North Cameroon. In J.L. Moock (Ed.), Understanding Africa’s rural households and farming systems (pp.105–123). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jutting, J., & Morrison, C. (2005). Changing social institutions to improve the status ofwomen in developing countries (OECD Development Centre Policy Brief #27). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed realities. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• . (2000). Social exclusion, poverty and discrimination: Towards ananalytical framework. IDS Bulletin,31(4), 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (2012). Women’s economic empowerment and inclusive growth: Labour
   Google Scholar
• markets and enterprise development (SIG WP 2012/1). Ottawa: IDRC.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, P. (2013). Transforming gender relations: Key to positive development outcomes in aquatic agricultural systems. Penang: WorldFish.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. (2012). Critical reflection and transformative learning. In E.W. Taylor, P. Cranton, & Associates (Eds), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research and practice (pp. 323–341). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., & Quisumbing, A.R. (2010). Access, adoption and diffusion: Understanding the long-term impacts of improved vegetable and fish technologies in Bangladesh. Washington, DC: IFPRI.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud, S., Sultan, M., & Huq, L. (2012). Assessing the performance of GQAL in changing gender norms and behavior (BDI Research Report #01). Dhaka: BRAC Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Manyire, H., & Apekey, A.D. (2013). Mainstreaming gender equality in African agricultural research and development: A study of constraints and opportunities. Accra, Ghana: Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA).
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P.Y. (2004). Gender as social institution. Social Forces,82(4), 1249–1273.
   Google Scholar
• McLeroy, K.R., Bibeau, D., Stechler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, /5(4), 351–377.
   Google Scholar
• Meinzen-Dick, R., Behrman, J., Menon, P., & Quisumbing, A. (2012). Gender: A key dimension linking agricultural programs to improved health and nutri-tion. In S. Fan & R. Pandya-Lorch (Eds), Reshaping agriculture for nutri-tion and health (pp. 135–144). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M., Choudhury, A., Sultana, N., Braun, M., Beare, D., Benedict, J., Rajaratnam, S., & Kantor, P. (2015). Understanding the gender dimensions of adopting climate-smart smallholder aquaculture innovations (Working Paper, AAS in process). Penang, Malaysia: CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. (2007). Power and the durability of poverty: A critical exploration of the links between culture, marginality and chronic poverty (Working Paper 107). Manchester: Chronic Poverty Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, D., & Apu, N.A. (1998). Women’s independent access to productive resources: Fish ponds in the Oxbow Lakes Project, Bangladesh. Gender Technology and Development,2(3), 397–413.
   Google Scholar
• Okali, C. (2012). Gender analysis: Engaging with rural development and agricultural policy processes (Working Paper 026). Future Agricultures Consortium. Brighton: IDS.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D., Waddington, H., & White, H. (2015). Why targeting matters: Examining the relationship between selection, participation and outcomes in farmer field school programmes,3ie Systematic Review 11. London: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie).
   Google Scholar
• Quisumbing, A.R. (2003). Household decisions, gender, and development: A synthesis of recent research. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, S. (2009). Engendering the political economy of agrarian change. Journal of Peasant Studies,36(1), 197–226.
   Google Scholar
• Risman, B. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society,18(4), 429–450.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J. (1997). Questioning empowerment: Working with women in Honduras. Oxford: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, K., Mekonnen, H., & Spurling, K. (1994). Raising the productivity of women farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank Discussion Paper 230). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Udry, C. (1996). Gender, agricultural production and the theory of the household. Journal of Political Economy,104(5), 1010–1046.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, C., Brown, J., Sherard, D., Tushabe, B., & Abdur-Rahman, A. (2011). Reconstructing gender norms through ritual communication: A study of African Transformation. Journal of Communication,61(2), 197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G. (2004). Informal security regimes: The strength of relationships. In I. Gough & G. Wood (Eds), Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America: Social policy in development contexts (pp. 49–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2001). Engendering development through gender equality in rights, resources and voice. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar