Climate Change, “Technology” and Gender: “Adapting Women” to Climate Change with Cooking Stoves and Water Reservoirs

References

• Benavidez, Y, & Olivas, A. (n.d.). Inventario de Tecnologias y prácticas para la adaptación al cambio entwine° en Las Segovias [Inventory of technologies and practices for climate change adaptation in Las Segovias]. Retrieved April 12, 2016, from http://www.farem.unan.edu.ni/redcambioclimatico/docs/PNUD-Inventario%20de%20Tecnologias.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Campos Cubas, V. M., Madriz Paladino, M., Lopez Baltodano, M., Valle Miranda, I., & Montiel Fernandez, W. (2012). Mapeo de riesgos, procesos, politicas pitblicas y actores asociados al cambio entwine° en Nicaragua [Mapping of climate change risks, processes, public policies and associated actors in Nicaragua]. Managua, Nicaragua: Centro Humboldt.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, R., Haggar, J., Quezada, A., & Torres, J. (2011). Technologies for climate change adaptation—agriculture sector Roskilde, Denmark: UNEP Riso Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. (1997). Domestic technologies: Cinderella and the engineers. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20 (3), 361–371.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W, & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity. Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19 (6), 829–859.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43 (6), 1241–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Elmhirst, R. (2011). Introducing new feminist political ecologies. Geoforum, 42 (2), 129–132.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, World Bank, & WAD. (2015). Gender in climate-smart agriculture: Module 18 for the Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook. World Bank Group, FAO and WAD. Retrieved April 12,2016, from http://www.fao.org/3/a-az917e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gonda, N. (n.d.). Revealing the patriarchal sides of climate change adaptation through intersectionality: A case study from Nicaragua. In S. Buckingham & V. Le Masson (Eds), Understanding Climate Change through Gender Relations (unpublished). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3, Autumn), 575-599.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D (1997). Modest Pfitness@Second Millennium.FemaleMan MeetsOncoMouse: Feminism and technoscience. London, New York: Routledge. Harding, S. G. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, P. (2012). Climate change adaptation: Business-as-usual aid and development or an emerging discourse for change International Journal of Development Issues, 11 (2), 92–110.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., & Fairhead, J. (2002). Manners of contestation: “Citizen science” and “indigenous knowledge” in West Africa and the Caribbean. International Social Science Journal, 54 (173), 299–311.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, S. (2010). Gender and climate change: From impacts to discourses. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 6 (2), 223–238.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. (2007). Feminist cultural studies of technoscience. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nicaraguan Government. (2010). Estrategia Nacional Ambiental y del Cambio Climático. Plan de Acción 2010-2015 [National Environmental and Climate Change strategy. 2010-2015 Action Plan]. Managua, Nicaragua: Nicaraguan Government.
   Google Scholar
• Nicaraguan Government. (2012). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo Humano 2012-2016 [NationalHuman Development Plan 2012-20161. Managua, Nicaragua: Nicaraguan Government.
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. J. (2006). The nature of gender: Work, gender and environment. Environment and Planning D, 24 (2), 165–185.
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. (2011). Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the materialproduction of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum, 42 (2), 153–162.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, K. N. (2001). Governing development: Neoliberalism, microcredit, and rational economic woman. Economy and Society, 30 (1), 18–37.
   Google Scholar
• Roncoli, C., Crane, T., & Orlove, B. (2009). Fielding climate change in cultural anthropology. In S. A. Crate & M. Nuttall (Eds), Anthropology and climate change: From encounters to actions (pp. 87–115). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. (1995). Colonial governmentality. Social Text, 3(Autumn), 191–220.
   Google Scholar
• Soares, D. (2006a). Género, letia y sostenibilidad: El caso de unacomunidad de los Altos de Chiapas [Gender, wood and sustainability: The case of a community in the highlands of Chiapas]. Revista Economia, Sociedad Y Territorio, 6 (21), 151–175.
   Google Scholar
• Soares, D (2006b). Mujeres, agua, letia y desarrollo: Estudio de caso sobre géneroy recursos naturales en los Altos de Chiapas [Women, water, wood and development: Case study on gender and natural resources in the highlands of Chiapas]. Gestión Y Cultura Del Agua, 2, 293–312.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland, T., Achdiawan, R., Angelsen, A., Babigumira, R., Ickowitz, A., Paumgarten, F., & Shively, G. (2014). Challenging perceptions about men, women, and forest product use: A global comparative study. World Development, 64(Supplement 1), S56—S66.
   Google Scholar
• Tschakert, P. (2012). From impacts to embodied experiences: Tracing political ecology in climate change research. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 112 (2), 144–158.
   Google Scholar
• Twyman, J., Bernier, Q., Muriel, J., Paz, L., Ortega, L., & Koningstein, M. (2015). Ensuring climate-smart agriculture is gender-smart: A participatory method for local adaptation planning with a gender focus. Poster presented at Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CAT), Cali, Colombia. Retrieved January 23,2016, from https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/65655
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34 (1), 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Weasel, L. H. (2004). Feminist intersections in science: Race, gender and sexuality through the microscope. Hypatia, 19 (1), 183–193.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., & Eclley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism and Psychology, 9 (3), 335–356.
   Google Scholar