Communication within archaeology: do we understand each other?

REFERENCES

• CARMAN, J., 2001. Discussion I. In Z. KobylifIski (ed.), Quo Vadis Archaeologia? Whither European Archaeology in the 21st Century?: 46. Warsaw: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• CARVER, M., 2003. Editorial. Antiquity 77(295):5–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ČMEJRKOV, S., 1996. Academic writing in Czech and English. In E. Ventola and Ventola. Mauranen (eds), Academic Writing. Intercultural and Textual Issues: 137–152. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• ČMEJRKOV, S., 2007a. Variation in academic discourse: The authorial presence. In U. Doleschal and Doleschal. Gruber (eds), Wissenschaftliches Schreiben abseits des englischen Mainstreams (Academic writing in languages other than English). Sprache im Kontext 25: 21-57. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• ČMEJRKOV, S., 2007b. Predstavitev avtorja v teg kih in slovag kih znanstvenih besedilih. Jezik in slovstvo 52:95–105.
   Google Scholar
• ČMEJRKOV, S., F. DANES and J. J, 1999. Jak napsat odborny text. Praha: Leda.
   Google Scholar
• CONARD, N.J., 2001. The future of archaeology. In Kobylifiski, Z. (ed.), Quo Vadis Archaeologia? Whither European Archaeology in the 21st Century?: 106–117. Warsaw: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• CRYSTAL, D., 2002 (1997). English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DANE, F., 1997. Jazyk vedy. In F. Daneg (ed.), Cesky jazyk na ptelomu tisicileti: 68–83. Praha: Academia.
   Google Scholar
• DANES, F. S. CmEjizi 1997. Territoriale und kooperative Prinzipien in der Wissenschaftssprache. In S. Höhne and M. Nekula (eds), Sprache, Wirtschaft, Kultur. Deutsche und Tschechen in Interaktion: 163–187. Munchen: Iudicium Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• DUSZAK, A., 1997a. Cross-cultural academic communication: a discourse-commu-nity view. In A. Duszak (ed.), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse: 11–39. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• DUSZAK, A., 1997b. (Re)orientation strategies in academic discourse. In E.-M. Jakobs and D. Knorr (eds), Schreiben in den Wissenschaften: 63-74. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• DUSZAK, A., ed. 1997c. Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• GALTUNG, J., 1981. Structure, culture, and intellectual style: An essay comparing saxonic, teutonic, gallic and nipponic approaches. Social Science Information 20(6):817–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRUCZA, F., 2003. Mehrsprachigkeit in Mitteleuropa und der Europäischen Union. In J. Besters-Dilger, R. de Cillia, H.-J. Krumrn and R. Rindler-Schjerve (eds), Mehrsprachigkeit in der erweiterten Europäischen Union - Multilingualism in the enlarged European Union - Multilingualisme dans l'Union Europenne elargie: 15–27. Klagenfurt/ Celovec: Drava Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• HRDLIČKA, M., 2001. K pfekladu odborného textu. In Termina 2000:175–178. Praha: Galén.
   Google Scholar
• HYLAND, K., 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. (Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series 54.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• JAKOBS, E.-M., 1997. Textproduktion als domänen- und kulturspezifisches Handeln. Diskutiert am Beispiel wissenschaftliches Schreibens. In K. Adamzik, G. Antos and E.-M. Jakobs (eds), Domiinen- und kulturspezifisches Schreiben: 9–30. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaf ten.
   Google Scholar
• KOCOUREK, R., 2001. Terminologické anglicismy: Pfitiny jejich vzniku, jejich lingvistickd povaha a misto v slovni zásob?. In Termina 2000:196–203. Praha: Galén.
   Google Scholar
• KRISTIANSEN, K., 2001. Borders of ignorance: Research communities and language. Discussion I. In Z. Kobyliriski (ed.), Quo Vadis Archaeologia? Whither European Archaeology in the 21st Century?: 38–43. Warsaw: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• LANG, V, 2000. Archaeology and language. Fennoscandia Archaeologica 17:103–110.
   Google Scholar
• MAURANEN, A., 1993. Cultural differences in academic discourse - problems of a linguistic and cultural minority. In L. Löfman et al. (eds), The Competent Intercultural Communicator:157-174. Publications de l'association finlandaise de linguistique appliquée 51.
   Google Scholar
• MAURANEN, A., 1996. Discourse competence - evidence from thematic develop-ment in native and non-native texts. In E. Vent°la and A. Mauranen (eds), Academic Writing. Intercultural and Textual Issues: 195–230. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• NEUSTUPN, E., 1998. Mainstream and minorities in archaeology. Archaeologia Polona 35–36 (1997–1998):13-23.
   Google Scholar
• NEUSTUPN, J.V., 2004. A theory of contact situations and the study of academic interaction. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 14(1):3–31.
   Google Scholar
• POGNER, K.-H., 1997. Diskursgemeinschaft und Interaktion. Zum Schreiben von beratenden Ingenieur /Innen. In K. Adamzik, G. Antos and E.-M. Jakobs (eds): Domiinen- und kulturspezifisches Schreiben: 127–150. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• SMOLRIKOV, S., 2004. Jazyková profilácia tasopisu Slovenslth archeológia. Slovenskci archeológia 52:347–366.
   Google Scholar
• SPARLING, D., 1989. English or Czenglish? Jak se vyhnout 6echismm v anglietine. Praha: Státni pedagogické naldadatelstvi.
   Google Scholar
• SWALES, J.M., 1991 (1990). Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VENCLOV, N., 2003. Jak si archeologové rozumeji. In L. flaejda and flaejda. Vateka (eds), Sedmdescit neustupnych let: 273–286. Plzen: Katedra archeologie FHS ZCU.
   Google Scholar
• VENTOLA, E., 1997. Modalization: Probability - an exploration into its role in aca-demic writing. In A. Duszak (ed), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse: 158–179. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• VENTOLA, E. and A. MAURANEN (eds), 1996. Academic Writing. Intercultural and Textual Issues. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• WILLEMS, W., 2001. Discussion I. In Z. Kobylinski (ed.), Quo Vadis Archaeologia? Whither European Archaeology in the 21st Century?: 46. Warsaw: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• YAKHONTOVA, T., 1997. The signs of a new time: Academic writing in ESP curricula of Ukrainian universities. In A. Duszak (ed.), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse: 103–112. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar