59
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

New knowledge versus consensus – a critical note on their relationship based on the debate concerning the use of barrel-vaults in Macedonian tombs

Pages 75-103 | Published online: 29 Nov 2013

REFERENCES

  • ANDREOU, S., M. FOTIADIS and K. K, 1996. Review of Aegean prehistory V: the Neolithic and Bronze Age of northern Greece. American Journal of Archaeology 100(3):537–597.
  • ANDRONIKOS, M., 1980. O vasilikos tafos tes Verginas kai to provlema tou nekrou. Archaiologika Analekta ex Athainon 12:156–167.
  • ANDRONIKOS, M., 1986. Vergina. Archaiologia kai Istoria. In G. E. E (ed.), Filia epe eis Georgion E. Mylonan, dia ta 60 ete tou anaskaphikou tou ergou: 19–37. Athens.
  • ANDRONIKOS, M., 1987. Some reflections on the Macedonian tombs. Annual of the British School at Athens 82:1–16.
  • ANDRONIKOS, M., 1988. Vergina. Anaskafe 1987. To arhaiologiko ergo ste Makedonia kai Thrake 1:81–84.
  • ANDRONIKOS, M., 1989. Vergina: the Royal Tombs and the Ancient City. Athens: Ekdotike Athenon.
  • ANDRONIKOS, M., 1999. To hroniko tes Verginas. Athens: Morfotiko idrima Ethnikes Trapezes.
  • ANON., 2006a. Editorial: Correction or retraction? Nature 444(7116):123–124.
  • ANON., 2006b. Editorial: Peer review and fraud. Nature 444(7073):971–972.
  • BALCER, J.M., 1995. The Persian Conquest of the Greeks. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag Konstanz.
  • BARNES, B., 1974. Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • BARNES, B., 1985. About Science. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • BARNES, B., 1990. Sociological theories of scientific knowledge. In R.C. Olby, G.N. Cantor, J.R.R. Christie and M.J.S. Hodge (eds), Companion to the History of Modern Science: 60–73. London: Routledge.
  • BARNES, B. and D. BLOOR, 1982. Relativism, rationalism and sociology of knowl-edge. In M. Hollis and Hollis. Lukes (eds), Rationality and Relativism, pp. 21–47. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • BARR-SHARRAR, B., 1982. Macedonian metal vases in perspective: some observa-tions on context and tradition. In B. Barr-Sharrar and E. Borza (eds), Macedonia and Greece in Late Classical and Early Hellenistic Times: 123–139. Washington DC: National Gallery of Art.
  • BAUMER, L.E. and U. WEBER, 1991. Zum Fries des 'Philippgrabes' von Vergina. Hefte des architologischen Seminars der Universitiit Bern 14: 27–41.
  • BINFORD, L.R., 1987. Data, relativism and archaeological science. Man (New Series) 22:391–404.
  • BLOOR, D., 1991. Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • BORZA, E.N., 1981. The Macedonian royal tombs at Vergina: some cautionary notes. Archaeological News 10(4):73–87.
  • BORZA, E.N., 1982. The history and archaeology of Macedonia: retrospect and prospect. In B. Barr-Sharrar and E. Borza (eds), Macedonia and Greece in Late Classical and Early Hellenistic Times: 17–30. Washington DC: National Gallery of Art.
  • BOURDIEU, P., 1991. The peculiar history of scientific reason. Sociological Forum 6(1):3–26.
  • BOURDIEU, P., 1996. Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity.
  • BOURDIEU, P., 2004. Science of Science and Reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity.
  • BOYD, T.D., 1978. The arch and the vault in Greek architecture. American Journal of Archaeology 82(1):83–100.
  • BRANDT, J.R., 2004. Det greske teater: gamle myter og nye idéer (Del I). Klassisk Forum 1:93–115.
  • BROWN, R.H. and E.L. L, 2004. Reason, politics, and the politics of truth: how science is both autonomous and dependent. Sociological Theory 22(1):106–122.
  • BUNGE, M.A., 1996. Finding Philosophy in Social Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • CALDER, W.M.I., 1981. Diadem and barrel-vault: a note. American Journal of Archaeology 85(3):334–335.
  • CHALMERS, A.F., 1982. What is This Thing Called Science? Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • CICIKOVA, M., 1969. Tombeau tumulaire Thrace du village Kalojanovo, arr. de Sliven (IVe S. AV. E.). Bulletin de l' Institut Archéologique Bulgare 31:45–55.
  • CLARKE, D.L., 1979. Analytical Archaeologist. New York: Academic Press.
  • COLE, S., 1983. The hierarchy of the sciences? The American Journal of Sociology 89(1):111–139.
  • COLE, S. and J.R. R, 1967. Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review 32(3):377–390.
  • COLE, S., J.R. R and COLE.G. A, 1981. Chance and consensus in peer review. Science 214(4523):881–886.
  • COLE, S., J.R. R and COLE.G. A, 1988. Do journal rejection rates index consen-sus? American Sociological Review 53(1):152–156.
  • COLLINS, H.M., 1981. Son of seven sexes: the social deconstruction of a physical phenomenon. Social Studies of Science (Special Issue: Knowledge and contro-versy of modern natural science) 11(1):33–62.
  • COLLINS, H.M., 1983. The sociology of scientific knowledge: studies of contempo-rary science. Annual Review of Sociology 9:265–285.
  • COLLINS, R., 1994. Why the social sciences won't become high-consensus, rapid-discovery science. Sociological Forum 9(2):155–177.
  • COSMETATOS-PHOKAS, S.P., 1999 (1919). E Makedonia apo ten arhaioteta mehri semera. Katerine: Mati.
  • COWAN, J.K. (ed.), 2000. Macedonia: the Politics of Identity and Difference. London: Pluto Press.
  • DANFORTH, L.M., 1995. The Macedonian Conflict: Ethnic Nationalism in a Transnational World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • DASKALAKES, A., 1983. The Hellenism of the Ancient Macedonians. Amsterdam: Hakkert.
  • DESPOINE, A., 1980. 0 tafos tes Katerines. Arhaiologika analekta ex Athenon 13(2):198–209.
  • DROUGOU, S., 1998. Vergina 1998 - Oi tafoi tou Heuzey. To arhaiologiko ergo ste Makedonia kai Thrake 12:395–402.
  • FOWLER, D.D., 1987. Uses of the past: archaeology in the service of the state. American Antiquity 52(2):229–248.
  • FREDRICKSMEYER, E.A., 1981. Again the so-called tomb of Philip II. American Journal of Archaeology 85(3):330–334.
  • FREDRICKSMEYER, E.A., 1983. Once more the diadem and barrel-vault at Vergina. American Journal of Archaeology 87(1):99–102.
  • FUCH S. S., 1986. The social organization of scientific knowledge. Sociological Theory 4(2):126–142.
  • FUCH S. S., 1993. A sociological theory of scientific change. Social Forces 71(4):933–953.
  • GIBBON, G., 1989. Explanation in Archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • GILES, J., 2006. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process. Nature 439(7074):252.
  • GLØRSTAD, H., 2000. Freedom of speech is always freedom from the speech of oth-ers, or rather control of their silence. On Pierre Bourdieu and archaeology. In C. Holtorf and Holtorf. Karlsson (eds), Philosophy and Archaeological Practice. Perspectives for the 21st Century:185-195. Goteborg: Bricoleur Press.
  • GLØRSTAD, H., 2006. Neolittisk renessanse. Hypoarkeologiske tekster om neolitikum i Sor-Norge. Oslo: Unipub. Oslo Academic Press.
  • GREEN, P., 1989. The Macedonian connection. In P. Green (ed.), Classical Bearings. Interpreting Ancient History and Culture: 151–164. London: Thames & Hudson.
  • HAMILAKIS, Y., 2007. The Nation and its Ruins. Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • HAMMOND, N.G.L., 1978. 'Philip's tomb' in historical context. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine studies 19(4):331–350.
  • HAMMOND, N.G.L., 1991. The royal tombs at Vergina: evolution and identities. The Annual of the British School at Athens 86:69–82.
  • HAMMOND, N.G.L. and G.T. T, 1979. A History of Macedonia 550–336 B.C. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • HARGENS, L.L., 1988. Scholarly consensus and journal rejection rates. American Sociological Review 53(1):139–151.
  • HARGENS, L.L. and L. KELLY-WILSON, 1994. Determinants of disciplinary discon-tent. Social Forces 72(4):1177–1195.
  • HATZOPOULOS, M.B. and M.B. B (eds), 1982. Makedonia: 4000 hronia ellenikes istorias kai politismou. Athens: Ekdotike Athenon.
  • HOROWITZ, I.L., 1962. Consensus, conflict and cooperation: a sociological inven-tory. Social Forces 41(2):177–188.
  • JASANOFF, S., 1996. Beyond epistemology: relativism and engagement in the poli-tics of science. Social Studies of Science 26(2):393–418.
  • KELLEY, J.H. and M.P. P, 1988. Archaeology and the Methodology of Science. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  • KLAPP, O.E., 1957. The concept of consensus and its importance. Sociology and Social Research 41:336–342.
  • KNORR-CETINA, K., 1995. How superorganisms change: consensus formation and the social ontology of high-energy physics experiments. Social Studies of Science 25(1):119–147.
  • KOFOS, E., 1997. Ethnike kleronomia kai ethnike tautoteta ste Makedonia tou 19ou kai 20ou aiona. In T. Veremis (ed.), Ethnike taftoteta kai ethnikismos ste neotere Ellada: 199–269. Athens: Morfotiko idryma tes Ethnikes Trapezes.
  • KOHLER, R.E., 1982. From Medical Chemistry to Biochemistry. The Making of a Biomedical Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • KOTSAKIS, K., 1998. The past is ours. Images of Greek Macedonia. In L. Meskell (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire. Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East: 44–67. London: Routledge.
  • KOTTAIUDOU, A., 1989. Vergina 1989. Anaskafe sto nekrotefeio sta voreiodytika tes arhaias poles. To arhaiologiko ergo ste Makedonia kai Thrake 3:1–11.
  • KUHN, T.S., 1970a. The logic of discovery or psychology of research? In I. Lakatos and Lakatos. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: 231–278. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • KUHN, T.S., 1970b. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • LATOUR, B., 1987. Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • LATOUR, B., 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • LATOUR, B. and S. WOOLGAR, 1986. Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • LAUDAN, L., 1990. The history of science and the philosophy of science. In R.C. Olby, G.N. Cantor, J.R.R. Christie and M.J.S. Hodge (eds), Companion to the History of Modern Science: 47–59. London: Routledge.
  • LEHMANN, P.W., 1980. The so-called Tomb of Philip II: a different interpretation. American journal of Archaeology 84(4):527–531.
  • LEHMANN, P.W., 1981. Once again the royal tomb at Vergina. Archaiologika analekta ex athainon 14:134–144.
  • LEHMANN, P.W., 1982. The so-called tomb of Philip II: an addendum. American Journal of Archaeology 86(3):437–442.
  • LEHRER, K. and C. WAGNER, 1981. Rational Consensus in Science and Society: a Philosophical and Mathematical Study. London: Reidel.
  • LEWIS, G.L., 1980. The relationship of conceptual development to consensus: An exploratory analysis of three subfields. Social Studies of Science 10(3):285–308.
  • LODAHL, J.B. and G. GORDON, 1972. The structure of scientific fields and the func-tioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review 37(2):57–72.
  • LONGINO, H.E., 1990. Science as Social Knowledge. Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • MARKOFF, J., 1982. Suggestions for the measurement of consensus. American Sociological Review 47(2):290–298.
  • MERTON, R.K., 1957. Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review 22(5):635–659.
  • MILLER, S.G., 1978. Excavations at Nemea 1977. Hesperia 47(1):58–88.
  • MILLER, S.G., 1993. The Tomb of Lyson and Kallikles: a Painted Macedonian Tomb. Mainz am Rhein: von Zabern.
  • MULKAY, M.J., 1969. Some aspects of cultural growth in the natural sciences. Social Research 36(1):22–52.
  • MULKAY, M.J., 1974. Conceptual displacement and migration in science: a prefa-tory paper. Social Studies of Science 4(3):205–234.
  • MULKAY, M.J. and G.N. N, 1982. Accounting for error: How scientists con-struct their social world when they account for correct and incorrect belief. Sociology 16(2):165–183.
  • NATURE.COM, 2008. URL (accessed December 2008): http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/index.html
  • NOWOTNY, H., 1999. The need for socially robust knowledge. TA-Datenbank-Nachrichten 8. Jahrgang:12–16.
  • ORLANDOS, A.K., 1958. Ta ylika domes ton Arhaion Ellenon kata tous syngrapheis, tas epigraphas kai ta mriemeia. Vivliotheke tes en Athenais Arhaiologikes Etaireias ar. 37, Athens.
  • PALAGIA, O., 2000. Hephaistion's pyre and the royal hunt of Alexander. In A.B. Bosworth and E.J. Baynharn (eds), Alexander the Great in Fact and Fiction: 167–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • PANDERMALIS, D. (ed.), 1992. Macedonia: The Historical Profile of Northern Greece. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
  • PAPATHEMELI S. S., 1987. Omilia tou ypourgou Makedonias - Thrakes. To arhaiologiko ergo ste Makedonia kai Thrake 1:XV-XVi.
  • PARTRIDGE, P.H., 1971. Consent and Consensus. London: Pall Mall Press.
  • PASPALAS, S.A., 2000. On Persian-type furniture in Macedonia: the recognition and transmission of forms. American journal of Archaeology 104(3):531–560.
  • POLANYI, M., 1963. The potential theory of adsorption. Science 141(3585):1010–1013.
  • PORTE R. R., 1990. The history of science and the history of society. In R.C. Olby, G.N. Cantor, J.R.R. Christie and M.J.S. Hodge (eds), Companion to the History of Modern Science: 32–46. London: Routledge.
  • PORTER, T.M., 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • PRESTIANNI GIALLOMBARDO, A.M., 1986. Il diadema di Vergina e l'iconografia di Filippo II. Ancient Macedonia IV: 497–509. Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies.
  • RENFREW, C., 1982. Explanation revisited. In C. Renfrew, M.J. Rowlands and B.A. Segraves (eds), Theory and Explanation in Archaeology: 5–23. New York and London: Academic Press.
  • RILEY, M.W., J.W. W and RILEY.M. L, 1952. The measurement of consensus. Social Forces 31(2):97–106.
  • RITTER, H.W., 1965. Diadem und Königsherrschaft. Munchen: C.H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
  • ROBERTSON, M., 1982. Early Greek mosaic. In B. Barr-Sharrar and E. Borza (eds), Macedonia and Greece in Late Classical and Early Hellenistic Times: 241–249. Washington DC: National Gallery of Art.
  • ROSSI, P.H. and R.A. A, 1985. Varieties of normative consensus. American Sociological Review 50(3):333–347.
  • SAATSOGLOU-PALIADELI, C., 1993. Aspects of ancient Macedonian costume. journal of Hellenic Studies 113:122–149.
  • SAATSOGLOU-PALIADELI, C., 1999. In the shadow of history: the emergence of archaeology. The Annual of the British School at Athens 94:353–367.
  • SAATSOGLOU-PALIADELI, C., 2003. Makedonis. Thessaloniki: Parateretes.
  • SAATSOGLOU-PALIADELI, C., 2004. Vergina. O tafos tou Filippou. E toihografia me to kynegi. Athens: Vivliotheke tes en Athenais Arhaiologikes Etaireias ar. 231.
  • SCHEFF, T.J., 1967. Toward a sociological model of consensus. American Sociological Review 32(1):32–46.
  • SCRIVEN, M., 1994. A possible distinction between traditional scientific disciplines and the study of human behavior. In M. Martin and L.C. McIntyre (eds), Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science: 71–77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • SHANKS, M. and C. TILLEY, 1987. Re-constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • SHAPIN, S., 1995. Here and everywhere: sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology 21:289–321.
  • SHILS, E., 1968. The concept of consensus. In D. L. L (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences:260-266. New York: Macmillan.
  • SHINN, T., 2002. The triple helix and new production of knowledge: prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Science 32(4):599–614.
  • SMITH, L.D., L.A. BEST, D.A. STUBBS, J. JOHNSTON and A.B. ARCHIBALD, 2000. Scientific graphs and the hierarchy of the sciences: a Latourian survey of inscription practices. Social Studies of Science 30(1):73–94.
  • SPITZER, S.P., 1964. Consensual states and communicative behavior. Sociometry 27(4):510–515.
  • STAR, S.L., 1989. Regions of the Mind: Brain Research and the Quest for Scientific Certainty. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • STOLZMAN, J.D., 1974. Edward Shils on consensus: an appreciation and critique. The British Journal of Sociology 25(1):3–14.
  • STORER, N.W., 1967. The hard sciences and the soft: some sociological observa-tions. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 55(1):75–84.
  • TOMLINSON, R.A., 1973. Vaulting techniques of the Macedonian tombs. Ancient Macedonia II: 473–479. Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies.
  • TOMLINSON, R.A., 1987. The architectural context of the Macedonian vaulted tombs. Annual of the British School at Athens 82:305–312.
  • TRIANTAFYLLIDOU, A., M. CALLONI and A. A, 1997. New Greek nationalism. Sociological Research Online 2(1). URL (accessed December 2008): http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/1/7.html
  • TRIGGER, B.G., 1995. Romanticism, nationalism, and archaeology. In C. Fawcett and P.L. Kohl (eds), Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology: 263–279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • TRIGGER, B.G., 1998. Archaeology and epistemology: dialoguing across the Darwinian chasm. American Journal of Archaeology 102(1):1–34.
  • TRIGGER, B.G., 2002. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • TRIPODI, B., 1991. Il fregio della caccia della II Tomba reale di Vergina e le cacce funerarie d' oriente. Dialogues d' histoire ancienne 17:143–209.
  • TSIMKDOU-AULONITE, M., 2002. Excavating a painted Macedonian tomb near Thessaloniki. An astonishing discovery. In M. Starnatopoulou and M. Yeroulanou (eds), Excavating Classical Culture: Recent Archaeological Discoveries in Greece: 91–97. Oxford: Archaeopress (BAR International Series 1031).
  • TURNER, S., 1991. Social constructionism and social theory. Sociological Theory 9(1):22–33.
  • VAN REYBROUCK, REYBROUCK., 2002. Boule's error: on the social context of the scientific knowledge. Antiquity 76(291):158–164.
  • VENEDIKOV, I., 1998. Thracian royal tombs. In I. Marazov (ed.), Ancient Gold: the Wealth of the Thracians: 72–83. New York.
  • VOKOTOPOULOU, J.P. (ed.), 1988. Macedonia from Mycenaean Times to Alexander the Great. Athens: Ministry of Culture.
  • VOKOTOPOULOU, J.P., 1993. Greek Civilization: Macedonia, Kingdom of Alexander the Great. Athens: Ministry of Culture.
  • WAGNER, C., 1978. Consensus through respect: a model of rational group deci-sion-making. Philosophical Studies 34(4):335–349.
  • WATSON, R.A., 1992. The place of archaeology in science. In L. Embree (ed.), Metaarchaeology: Reflections by Archaeologists and Philosophers: 255–267. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • WYLIE, A., 1992a. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity 57(1):15–35.
  • WYLIE, A., 1992b. On 'heavily decomposing red herrings': scientific method in archae-ology and the ladening of evidence with theory. In L. Embree (ed.), Metaarchaeology: Reflections by Archaeologists and Philosophers: 269–288. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • WYLIE, A., 1994. Evidential constraints: pragmatic objectivism in archaeology. In M. Martin and L.C. McIntyre (eds), Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science: 747–765. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • WYLIE, A., 1997. The engendering of archaeology. Refiguring feminist science studies. Osiris 12:80–99.
  • YOELS, W.C., 1974. The structure of scientific fields and the allocation of editor-ships on scientific journals: Some observations on the politics of knowledge. The Sociological Quarterly 15(2):264–276.
  • ZIMAN, J.M., 1968. Public Knowledge: an Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • ZIMAN, J.M., 1978. Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • ZUCKERMAN, H.A. and R.K. K, 1971. Patterns of evaluation in science: insti-tutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva 9(1):66–101.
  • ZUCKERMAN, H.A. and R.K. K, 1973. Age, aging and age structure in sci-ence. In N. Storer (ed.), The Sociology of Science: 497–559. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.