729
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The POLST paradigm and form:
Facts and analysis

, Ph.D., , M.D., , R.S.M., D.O., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , R.N., Ph.D., , Ph.D., S.T.L., , J.D. & , J.D. show all
Pages 103-138 | Published online: 18 Jul 2013

References

  • Briggs L. 2003. Shifting the focus of advance care planning: using an in-depth interview to build and strengthen relationships. Innovations in End-of-Life Care 5: http://www.edc.org/lastacts
  • Brugger E. C. 2011. A Critique of the National POLST Paradigm through an analysis of Colorado's new MOST Legislation. The Linacre Quarterly 78: 157–71, esp. 158–61.
  • Brugger E. C., et al. 2012. POLST and Catholic Health Care. Ethics & Medics 37:2.
  • CANHR Policy Brief. 2010. Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (“POLST”) – Problems and Recommendations. A Special Report by California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, San Francisco, CA, http://www.canhr.org/reports/2010/POLST_WhitePaper.pdf
  • Coleman G. D., Mclean M. R. 2012. POLST supports care in context of ERDs. Health Progress: Journal of the Catholic Health Association of the United States 58–65.
  • Cosgriff J. A., Fried T. R., et al. 2007. The association between treatment preferences and trajectories of care at the end of life. J Gen Intern Med 22:1566–71.
  • Detering K. M., et al. 2010. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal 340: 1345–53.
  • Dominique K. 2009. MOLST Demonstration Project: Care Transitions Seminar. Partners HealthCare.
  • Dunn P. M. 1992. The health ethics network of oregon: a model to enhance healthcare ethics committee collaboration. HEC Forum 4:135–48.
  • Dunn P. M., Schmidt T. A., Carley M. M., Donius M., Weinstein M. A., Dull V.T. 1996. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 44:785–91
  • Fagerlin A., Schneider C. E. 2004. Enough – the failure of the living will. Hastings Center Report 34:30–42.
  • Flygt T. R. 2012. Reflections on the use of the POLST paradigm. Health Care Ethics USA: A Resource for the Catholic Health Care Ministry 20:47.
  • Fried T. R., et al. 2002. Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. New England Journal of Medicine 346:1061–66.
  • Geisz M. B. Researchers Study End-of-Life Care in Oregon, Issue Report Card, Engage Health Care Professionals to Improve Care. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
  • Griggons C. 2010. Patients without oroxies: what's happening in other states? Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter 7–9.
  • Hamel R. 2012. POLST under fire. Health Care Ethics USA 20:30–5, quote on 34.
  • Hammes B. J., Rooney B. L. 1998. Death and end-of-life planning in one midwestern community. Archives of Internal Medicine 158:383–90.
  • Hammes B. J., et al. 2010. A comparative retrospective, observational study of the prevalence, availability, and specificity of advance care plans in a county that implemented an advance care planning microsystem. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 58:1249–55.
  • Hammes B. J., et al. 2012. The POLST program: a retrospective review of the demographics of use and outcomes in one community where advance directives are prevalent. Journal of Palliative Medicine 15:77–85.
  • Hardwig J. 2009. Going to meet death: the art of dying in the early part of the twenty-first century. Hastings Center Report 39:37–45.
  • Hickman S. E., Tolle S. W., Tilden V. P., Rosenfeld A. G. 1999. The Oregon Report Card: Improving Care of the Dying. Portland, OR: The Center for Ethics in Health Care, Oregon Health & Science University.
  • Hickman S. E., et al. 2005. Hope for the future: achieving the original intent of advance directives. Hastings Center Report Special Report 35:S26–30.
  • Hickman S. E., et al. 2010. A Comparison of methods to communicate treatment preferences in nursing facilities: traditional practices versus the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 58:1241–8.
  • Hill T. P., Shirley D. A. and Choice in Dying (Organization: U.S.). 1992. A Good Death: Taking More Control at the End of Your Life. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
  • John Paul. 2004. Life-Sustaining Treatments and the Vegetative State: Scientific Advances and Ethical Dilemmas (On the “Vegetative State”), http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/2004/march/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20040320_congress-fiamc_en.html
  • Jones A. L., Dwyer L. L., Bercovitz A. R., Strahan G. W. 2009. The national nursing home survey: 2004 overview. National center for health statistics. Vital Health Stat 13:4, Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_13/sr13_167.pdf
  • Karp N., Wood E. 2004. Incapacitated and Alone: Healthcare Decision Making for Unbefriended Older People ABA. Human Rights 31:20–24, available at http://www.americanbar.org/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/human_rights_vol31_2004/spring2004/hr_spring04_incapacitated.html
  • Keating R. F., Moss A. H., Sorkin M., Paris J.J., et al. 1994. Stopping dialysis of an incompetent patient over the family's objection: is it ever ethical and legal? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4:1879–83.
  • Kon A. A. 2010. The shared decision-making continuum. Journal of the American Medical Association 304:903–4.
  • Kurent J. E. 2000. Death and dying in America: the need to improve end-of-life care. Carolina Healthcare Business 16–9.
  • Kutner L. 1969. Due process of Euthanasia: the living will, a proposal. Indiana Law Journal 44, 539–54.
  • Landro L. 2011. New efforts to simplify end-of-life care wishes. Wall Street Journal, Mar. 15, 2011.
  • Lewis-Husk L., Garland M. J. 1999. Pink ‘Polst’ works in Oregon: use spreading across U.S. In The First Decade, ed. , Tolle Susan W., Chiodo Gary T., p. 10. Portland, OR: The Center for Ethics in Health Care, Oregon Health Sciences University.
  • Lynn J., et al. 2008. Improving Care for the End of Life, A Sourcebook for Health Care Managers and Clinicians, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press; p. 7.
  • Meier D., Beresford L. 2009. POLST Offers Next Stage in Honoring Patient Preferences. Journal of Palliative Medicine 12:291–5.
  • Meyers J. L., et al. 2004. Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form to honor the wishes of Nursing Home Residents for End of Life Care: Preliminary Results of a Washington State Pilot Project. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 30:37–46.
  • Moss A. H. 2000. A New Clinical Practice Guideline on Initiation and Withdrawal of Dialysis That Makes Explicit the Role of Palliative Medicine. J Palliat Med 3:253–60.
  • Moss A. H., et al. 2010. Prognostic significance of the ‘‘Surprise’’ question in cancer patients. Journal of Palliative Medicine 13:837–40.
  • Nelson S. E., Tuohey J. F. 2011. POLST: A Dangerous Development or a Useful Tool?. Catholic Health Association Webinar June 28, 2011.
  • Otten A. L. 1999. The Greenwall Foundation: A Story of a Work in Progress. New York, NY: The Greenwall Foundation.
  • Parker S. G. 2004. Community–State Partnerships. In Program Results (http://www.rwjf.org/en/research-publications/find-rwjf-research/2004/10/community-state-partnerships-to-improve-end-of-life-care.html: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation).
  • Perkins H. S. 2007. Controlling death: The false promise of advance directives. Annals of Internal Medicine 147:51–7.
  • President's Council on Bioethics. 2005. Taking care: ethical caregiving in our aging society. https://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/taking_care/index.html
  • Project on Death in America. 1998. Project on Death in America: Report of Activities (July 1994–December 1997). New York, NY: Open Society Institute.
  • Project on Death in America. 2009. Project on Death in America Grantees, 1994–2003. http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/pdia_20040101.pdf
  • Reinhardt U. E. 2009. How do hospitals get paid? A primer. New York Times, January 23, 2009. Available at http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/how-do-hospitals-get-paid-a-primer/
  • Respecting Choices. 2007. Advance Care Planning: Facilitating the Process. In Advance Care Planning: Facilitator's Manual, 3rd ed. La Crosse, WI: Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation.
  • Sabatino C. P. 2010. The evolution of health care advance planning law and policy. Milbank Quarterly 88:211–39.
  • Sabatino C. P., Karp N. 2011 Improving Advanced Illness Care: The Evolution of State POLST Programs. Washington, D.C.: AARP Public Policy Institute; v:164.
  • Saunders W. L. 2011. POLST: Ethical Considerations for Catholic Health Care Providers and Patients, p. 4; delivered at International Association of Catholic Bioethicists conference, July 2011, at Philadelphia, PA; theme Palliative Sedation: Moral Distinctions and Practical Considerations, available at http://www.iacbweb.org/Readings/Saunders2011.pdf
  • Silverman D. 2011. Serving the Unbefriended Elder Population: Trends, Challenges, and Successes. Power Point Presentation, Minnesota Age & Disabilities Odyssey, Mayo Civic Center, Rochester, MN, June 21, 2011, accessed at http://www.mnodyssey.org/2011/PowerPoint/Monday/McDonnell-B/9-30am/SilvermanOdysseyFinal.pptx at slide 31.
  • Smith W. 1997. Forced Exit: The Slippery Slope from Assisted Suicide to Legalized Murder. New York: Times Books.
  • Sudore R. L., Fried T. R. 2010. Redefining the ‘Planning’ in advance care planning: preparing for end-of-life decision making. Annals of Internal Medicine 153:256–61.
  • Sudore R. L., et al. 2010. Uncertainty about advance care planning treatment preferences among diverse older adults. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives 15(S2):159–71.
  • Tolle S. W., Tilden V. P. 2002. Changing end-of-life planning: the oregon experience. Journal of Palliative Medicine 5:311–7.
  • Tuohey J. F. 2010. POLST orders are not dangerous but effective devices for end-of-life care. Ethics & Medics 35:3–4.
  • Tuohey J., Hodges M. O. 2011. POLST reflects patient wishes, clinical reality. Health Progress: Journal of the Catholic Health Association of the United States 60–4.
  • White D. B., et al. 2007. Life Support for Patients without a Surrogate Decision Maker: Who Decides? Annals of Internal Medicine 147:34–40.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.