Instructors’ Address Forms Influence Course Ratings

Bibliography

• Andersen Kristi, Miller Elizabeth D. 1997. ‘Gender and Student Evaluations of Teaching.’ PS:Political Science and Politics 30: 216–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins-Sayre Wendy. 2005. ‘Naming Women: The Emergence of ‘Ms’ as a Liberatory Title.’ Women and Language 28: 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Basow Susan A. 1995. ‘Student Evaluations of College Professors: When Gender Matters.’ Journal of Educational Psychology 87: 656–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basow Susan A, Suzan Distenfeld M. 1985. ‘Teacher Expressiveness: More Important for Male Teachers than Female Teachers?’ Journal of Educational Psychology 77: 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basow Susan, Howe Karen G. 1987. ‘Evaluations of College Professors: Effects of Professors’ Sex-type, and Sex, and Students’ Sex.’ Psychological Reports 60: 671–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basow Susan, Silberg Nancy T. 1987. ‘Student Evaluations of College Professors: Are Female and Male Professors Rated Differently?’ Journal of Educational Psychology 79: 308–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett Sheila K. 1982. ‘Student Perceptions of and Expectations for Male and Female Instructors: Evidence Relating to the Question of Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluation.’ Journal of Educational Psychology 74: 170–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown Roger, Ford Marguerite. 1961. ‘Address in American English.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62: 375–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centra John A, Gaubatz Noreen B. 2000. ‘Is There Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching?’ Journal of Higher Education 71: 17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford Mary, Bell D, Mizerny B. 1980. June. ‘What’s in a Name? Attitudes Toward Ms and Other Courtesy Titles.’ Paper presented at the National Women’s Studies Association. Bloomington, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford Mary, Stark Amy C, Renner Catherine H.. 1998. ‘The Meaning of Ms: Social Assimilation of a Gender Concept.’ Psychology of Women Quarterly 22: 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion Kenneth L. 1987. ‘What’s in a Title? The Ms Stereotype and Images of Women’s Titles of Address.’ Psychology of Women Quarterly 11: 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore Patricia B, LaPointe Karen A. 1974. ‘Effects of Teacher Sex and Student Sex on the Evaluation of College Instructors.’ Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 386–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore Patricia B, LaPointe Karen A. 1975. ‘Effect of Teacher Sex, Student Sex, and Teacher Warmth on the Evaluation of College Instructors.’ Journal of Educational Psychology 67: 368–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman Kenneth A. 1993. ‘College Students’ Views of Male and Female College Teachers: Part II — Evidence from Students’ Evaluations of their Classroom Teachers.’ Research in Higher Education 34: 151–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman Harvey R. 1994. ‘Student Evaluations of College Instructors: Effects of Type of Course Taught, Instructor Gender and Gender Role, and Student Gender.’ Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 627–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamermesh Daniel S, Parker Amy. 2005. ‘Beauty in the Classroom: Instructors’ Pulchritude and Putative Pedagogical Productivity.’ Economics of Education Review 24: 369–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman Madeline E. 1975. ‘Miss, Mrs, Ms, or None of the Above.’ American Psychologist 30: 516–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaschak Ellyn. 1978. ‘Sex Bias in Student Evaluations of College Professors.’ Psychology of Women Quarterly 2: 235–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kierstead Diane, D’Agostino Patti, Dill Heidi. 1988. ‘Sex Role Stereotyping of College Professors: Bias in Students’ Ratings of Instructors.’ Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 342–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardo John P, Tocci Mary E. 1979. ‘Attribution of Positive and Negative Characteristics of Instructors as a Function of Attractiveness and Sex of Instructor and Sex of Subject.’ Perceptual and Motor Skills 48: 491–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGoldrick Kimmarie, Schuhmann Peter W. 2002. ‘Instructor Gender and Student Registration: An Analysis of Preferences.’ Education Economics 10: 241–260.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy George L. 1988. ‘Personal Reference in English.’ Language in Society 17: 317–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musumeci Diane. 1991. ‘Ciao, Professessora! A Study of Forms of Address in Italian and its Implications for the Language Classroom.’ Italica 68: 434–456.
   Google Scholar
• Saeed JohnI. 2009. Semantics (3rd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler Bernice R. 1991. ‘Women Faculty at Work in the Classroom, or, Why it Still Hurts to Be a Woman in Labor.’ Communication Education 40: 6–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takiff Hilary A, Sanchez Diana T, Stewart Tracie L. 2001. ‘What’s in a Name? The Status Implications of Students’ Terms of Address for Male and Female Professors.’ Psychology of Women Quarterly 25: 134–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatro Clayton N. 1995. ‘Gender Effects on Student Evaluations of Faculty.’ Journal of Research and Development in Education 28: 169–173.
   Google Scholar
• Wright Saundra K. 2009. ‘Forms of Address in the College Classroom.’ Names in Multi-Lingual, Multi- Cultural, and Multi-Ethnic Contact, Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress of Onomastic Sciences. Ed. Wolfgang Ahrens, Sheila Embleton, and Andre Lapierre. Toronto, ON: York University, 1079–1087.
   Google Scholar