123
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
An aborted attempt at settling New France in the 16th century: Cartier and Roberval's Charlesbourg Royal

From myth to reality: archaeobotany at the Cartier-Roberval Upper Fort site

&
Pages 87-105 | Published online: 19 Jul 2013

Bibliography

Published Sources

  • Anderson, P. 1999, Prehistory of Agriculture: New Experimental and Ethnographic Approaches, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Asch, D. & Asch Sidell, N. 1989, ‘Archaeological plant remains: applications to stratigraphic analysis’, in Hastorf & Popper 1989, 86–96.
  • Audet, B. 2001, Se nourrir au quotidien en Nouvelle- France, Sainte-Foy (Québec): Éditions GID.
  • Blake, L. & Cutler, H. 2001, Plants from the Past, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
  • Boardman, S. & Jones, G. 1990, ‘Experiments on the effects of charring on cereal plant components’, J. Archaeol. Sci. 17, 1–11.
  • Boyd, M., Varney, T., Surette, C. & Surette, J. 2008, ‘Reassessing the northern limit of maize consumption in North America: stable isotope, plant microfossil, and trace element content of carbonized food residue’, J. Archaeol. Sci. 35, 2545–56.
  • Braudel, F. (ed.) 1984, Le Monde de Jacques Cartier: L’aventure au XVIe siècle, Montréal: Libre- Expression.
  • Braadbaart, F. & van Bergen, P. 2005, ‘Digital imaging analysis of size and shape of wheat and pea upon heating under anoxic conditions as a function of the temperature’, Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 14, 67–75.
  • Brinkkemper, O. 1993. ‘Indirect correspondence analysis and botanical macroremains: a case study’, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 26, 83–91.
  • Burns, R. & Honkala, B. 1990, Silvics of North America, 2 vols, Washington: US Department of Agriculture.
  • Butler, A. 1991, ‘The Vicieae: problems of identifi cation’, in Renfrew 1991, 61–73.
  • Cappers, R.T.J., Bekker, R.M. & Jans, J.E.A. 2006, Digital Seed Atlas of the Netherlands, Groningen: Barkhuis Publishing.
  • Castner, J.L. 2004, Photographic Atlas of Botany and Guide to Plant Identifi cation, Gainesville (Fl.): Feline Press.
  • Cook, R. (ed.) 1993, The Voyages of Jacques Cartier, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Cutler, H. & Blake, L. 2001, ‘North American Indian corn’, in Blake & Cutler 2001, 1–18.
  • Davis, L.W. 1993, Weed Seeds of the Great Plains: A Handbook for Identifi cation, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
  • Deagan, K. 1983, Spanish St. Augustine: The Archaeology of a Colonial Creole Community, New York & London: Academic Press.
  • Deagan, K. 1995, The Archaeology of a Sixteenth-Century Spanish Town in Hispaniola: Puerto Real, Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
  • Deagan, K. & Cruxent, J.M. 2002a, Colombus’s Outpost among the Taínos: Spain and America at La Isabela 1493–1498, New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
  • Deagan, K. & Cruxent, J.M. 2002b, Archaeology at La Isabela: America’s First European Town, New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
  • Dincauze, D. 2000, Environmental Archaeology: Principles and Practice, Cambridge: University Press.
  • Dumont, B. 2005a, Les Niches écologiques des arbres, arbustes et conifères, Boucherville: Éditions Bertrand Dumond.
  • Dumont, B. 2005b, Les Niches écologiques des vivaces et plantes herbacées, Boucherville: Éditions Bertrand Dumond.
  • Etkin, N.L. (ed.) 1994, Eating on the Wild Side. The Pharmacologic, Ecologic, and Social Implications of Using Noncultigens, Tucson & London: University of Arizona Press.
  • Ferrières, M. 2002, Histoire des peurs alimentaires du Moyen-Âge à l’aube du XXe siècle, Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
  • Gaimster, D. & Stamper, P. (eds) 1997, The Age of Transition: the Archaeology of English Culture 1400–1600, Oxford: Oxbow.
  • Giorgi, J. 1997, ‘Diet in late medieval and early modern London: the archaeobotanical evidence’, in Gaimster & Stamper 1997, 197–213.
  • Greig, J. 1989, Archaeobotany, Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
  • Gremillon, K., 2002, ‘Archaeobotany at Old Mobile’, Hist. Archaeol. 361, 117–28.
  • Hardin, J.W. & Arena, J.M. 1969, Human Poisoning from Native and Cultivated Plants, Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Hastorf, C. & Popper, V. 1989, Current Paleoethnobotany: Analytical Methods and Cultural Interpretations of Archaeological Plant Remains, Chicago: University Press.
  • Hillman, G. 1984. ‘Interpretation of archaeological plant remains: the application of ethnographic models from Turkey’, in van Zeist & Casparie 1984, 1–41.
  • Hillman, G., Mason, S., De Moulins, D. & Nesbitt, M. 1996, ‘Identifi cation of archaeological remains of wheat: the 1992 London workshop’, Circaea, J. Ass. Environmental Archaeol. 12, 195–209.
  • Hubbard, R. 1992. ‘Dichotomous keys for the identifi cation of the major Old World crops’, Rev. Palaeobot. Palyn. 73, 105–15.
  • Hubbard, R. & Clapham, A. 1992, ‘Quantifying macroscopic plant remains’, Rev. Palaeobotany and Palynology 73, 117–32.
  • Huss-Ashmore, R. & Johnston, S.L. 1994, ‘Wild plants as cultural adaptations to food stress’, in Etkin 1994, 62–82.
  • Jones, G. 1984, ‘Interpretation of archaeological plant remains: Ethnographic models from Greece’, in van Zeist & Casparie 1984, 43–61.
  • Jones, G. 1991, ‘Numerical analysis in archaeobotany’, in van Zeist, Wasylikowa & Behre 1991, 63–80.
  • Jones, S., Taylor, J. & Ash, F. 2004, Seed Identifi cation Handbook. Agriculture, Horticulture & Weeds, Cambridge: NIAB.
  • Kiple, K. & Ornelas, K. (eds) 2000, The Cambridge World History of Food, Cambridge: University Press.
  • Kühn, F. 1991, ‘Problems of identifi cation of seeds and fruits of spelt wheat, oats and legumes’, in Renfrew 1991, 59–60.
  • Laurioux, B. 2002, Manger au Moyen Âge: pratiques et discours alimentaires en Europe aux XIVe et XVe siècles, Paris: Hachette.
  • Lennstrom, H. & Hastorf, C. 1992, ‘Testing old wives’ tales in paleoethnobotany: a comparison of bulk and scatter sampling schemes from Pacan, Peru’, J. Archaeol. Sci. 19, 205–29.
  • Mangafa, M. & Kotsakis, K. 1996, ‘A new method for the identifi cation of wild and cultivated charred grape seeds’, J. Archaeol. Sci. 23, 409–18.
  • Marie-Victorin (Bro.) 2002, Flore Laurentienne, Montréal: Gaëtan Morin.
  • Martin, A. & Barkley, W. 2000, Seed Identifi cation Manual, Caldwell: Blackburn Press.
  • Miller, T.E. 1999, ‘A cautionary note on the use of morphological characters for recognizing taxa in wheat genus Triticum’, in Anderson 1999, 169–72.
  • Minnis, P. 1981, ‘Seeds in archaeological sites: sources and some interpretive problems’, Amer. Antiq. 46, 143–52.
  • Mrozowski, S. 1999, ‘Colonization and the commodifi cation of nature’, Int. J. Hist. Archaeol. 33, 153–66.
  • Munroe, D.B. 2008, Canadian Poisonous Plants Information System, <http://www.cbif.gc.ca/pls/pp/poison?p_x=px> [updated 18 March 2008].
  • Munson, P., Parmalee, P. & Yarnell, R. 1971, ‘Subsistence ecology of Scovill, a Terminal Middle Woodland village’, Amer. Antiq. 36, 410–31.
  • Neuchatel (Institut d’ethnologie de l’université de) 1984, Identité alimentaire et altérité culturelle, Neuchatel: Institut d’ethnologie de l’université de Neuchatel.
  • Pearsall, D. 1989, ‘Interpreting the meaning of macroremain abundance: the impact of source and context’, in Hastorf & Popper 1989, 97–118.
  • Prance, G. & Nesbitt, M. 2005, The Cultural History of Plants, New York & London: Routledge.
  • Preiswerk, Y. 1984, ‘Des nourritures pour dire une vision du monde?’, in Neuchatel 1984, 249–57.
  • Provencher, J. 1996, Les Quatre Saisons dans la vallée du Saint-Laurent, Montréal: Boréal.
  • Reitz, E & Cumbaa, S. 1983, ‘Diet and foodways of eighteenth-century Spanish St. Augustine’, in Deagan 1983, 151–85.
  • Reitz, E. & Scarry, M. 1985, Reconstructing Historic Subsistence with an Example from Sixteenth-Century Spanish Florida, Soc. Hist. Archaeol. Special Pub. ser. 3.
  • Reitz, E. & McEwan, B. 1995, ‘Animals, environment, and the Spanish diet at Puerto Real’, in Deagan 1995, 287–334.
  • Renfrew, J. 1973, Palaeoethnobotany: the Prehistoric Food Plants of the Near East and Europe, New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Renfrew, J. (ed.) 1991, New Light on Early Farming: Recent Developments in Palaeoethnobotany, Edinburgh: University Press.
  • Robert, J. 1984, ‘L’invention d’un héros’, in Braudel 1984, 295–302.
  • Scarry, M. & Reitz, E. 1990, ‘Herbs, fi sh, scum, and vermin: subsistence strategies in sixteenthcentury Spanish Florida’, in Thomas 1990, 343–56.
  • Swannack, J. 1974, Manuel de fouilles archéologiques, Ottawa: Parcs Canada.
  • Thomas, D.H. (ed.) 1990, Columbian Consequences, 2. Archaeological and Historical Perspectives on the Spanish Borderlands East, Washington:
  • Smithsonian Press. van der Veen, M. 2007, ‘Formation processes of dessicated and carbonized plant remains — the identifi cation of routine practice’, J. Archaeol. Sci. 34, 968–90.
  • van Zeist, W. & Casparie, W.A. (eds) 1984, Plants and Ancient Man: Studies in Paleoethnobotany, Rotterdam & Boston: Balkema.
  • van Zeist, W., Wasylikowa, K. & Behre, K.-E. 1991, Progress in Old World Palaeoethnobotany, Rotterdam: Balkema.
  • Vaughan, J.G. & Geissler, C. 1999, The New Oxford Book of Food Plants, Oxford: University Press.
  • Wagner, G. 1989, ‘Comparability among recovery techniques’, in Hastorf & Popper 1989, 17–35.
  • Wilson, D.G. 1984, ‘The carbonisation of weed seeds and their representation in macrofossil assemblages’, in van Zeist & Casparie 1984, 201–6.
  • Zohary, D. & Hopf, M. 2000, Domestication of Plants in the Old World, Oxford: University Press.

Unpublished Sources

  • Bouchard-Perron, J.-A. 2008a, ‘D’un continent à l’autre: les restes végétaux sur le site Cartier- Roberval: Résultats de l’analyse archéobotanique de 2007’, Québec: CCNQ.
  • Bouchard-Perron, J.-A. 2008b, ‘L’Îlot des Palais: l’évolution d’un site à travers les restes végétaux: Résultats de l’analyse archéobotanique des dépôts des opérations 47 à 60 — Partie I’, Québec: Ville de Québec.
  • Fortin, C. 1995, ‘Analyse paléoethnobotanique du site Aubert-de-la-Chesnaye (Site CeEt-46, Québec)’, Québec: Ville de Québec and MCCQ.
  • Margaritis, E. & Jones, M. forthcoming, ‘Crop processing of Olea europaea L.: an experimental approach for the interpretation of archaeobotanical olive remains’, Veg. Hist. Archaeobot.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.