46
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Studies

A Simple Mathematical Procedure for Estimating the Adequacy of Site Survey Strategies

Pages 91-96 | Published online: 18 Jul 2013

  • Davis, John C. 1986 Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Dunnell, Robert C. 1988 “Low Density Archaeological Records from Plowed Sur-faces: Some Preliminary Considerations,” American Archaeology 7: 29–38.
  • Dunnell, Robert C., and William S. Dancey 1983 “The Siteless Survey: A Regional Scale Data Collection Strategy,” in Michael B. Schiffer, ed., Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 6. New York: Academic Press, 267–287.
  • Ebert, James I. 1988 “Modeling Human Systems and ‘Predicting’ the Archae-ological Record: The Unavoidable Relationship of Theory and Method,” American Archaeology 7: 3–8.
  • Goodyear, Albert C., L. Mark Raab, and Timothy C. Klinger 1978 “The Status of Archaeological Research Design in Cultural Resource Management,” American Antiquity 43: 159–173.
  • Judge, W. James 1981 “Transect Sampling in Chaco Canyon: Evaluation of a Survey Technique,” in Alden C. Hayes, David M. Brugge, and W. James Judge, Archaeological Survey of Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. Chaco Canyon Studies Publications in Archaeology 18A. Washington: National Park Service.
  • King, Thomas F. 1978 The Archaeological Survey: Methods and Uses. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service.
  • Kintigh, Keith W. 1988 “The Effectiveness of Subsurface Testing: A Simulation Approach,” American Antiquity 53: 686–707.
  • Kohler, Timothy A., and Sandra C. Parker 1986 “Predictive Models for Archaeological Resource Loca-tion,” in Michael B. Schiffer, ed., Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 10. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 397–452.
  • Krakker, James J., Michael J. Short, and Paul D. Welch 1983 “Design and Evaluation of Shovel Test Sampling in Regional Archaeological Survey,” Journal of Field Archaeol-ogy 10: 469–480.
  • Lightfoot, Kent G. 1986 “Regional Surveys in the Eastern United States: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Implementing Subsurface Testing Programs,” American Antiquity 51: 484–504.
  • Lightfoot, Kent G. 1989 “A Defense of Shovel-Test Sampling: A Reply to Short,” American Antiquity 54: 413–416.
  • Lynch, B. Mark 1980 “Site Artifact Density and the Effectiveness of Shovel Probes,” Current Anthropology 21: 516–517.
  • McManamon, Francis P. 1984 “Discovering Sites Unseen,” in Michael B. Schiffer, ed., Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 8. New York: Academic Press, 223–292.
  • Mueller, James W. 1975 Sampling in Archaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • Nance, Jack D. 1983 “Regional Sampling in Archaeological Survey: The Sta-tistical Perspective,” in Michael B. Schiffer, ed., Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 6. New York: Academic Press, 289–356.
  • Nance, Jack D., and Bruce F. Ball 1986 “No Surprises? The Reliability and Validity of Test Pit Sampling,” American Antiquity 51: 457–483.
  • Nance, Jack D., and Bruce F. Ball 1989 “A Shot in the Dark: Short's Comments on Nance and Ball,” American Antiquity 54: 405–412.
  • Plog, Stephen, Fred Plog, and Walter Wait 1978 “Decision Making in Modern Surveys,” in Michael B. Schiffer, ed., Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 384–482.
  • Plog, Fred, Margaret Weide, and Marilyn Stewart 1977 “Research Design in the SUNY-Binghampton Contract Program,” in Michael B. Schiffer and George J. Gum-erman, eds., Conservation Archaeology. New York: Aca-demic Press, 107–120.
  • Redman, Charles L. 1987 “Surface Collection, Sampling, and Research Design: A Retrospective,” American Antiquity 52: 249–265.
  • Schiffer, Michael B., and George J. Gumerman, eds. 1977 Conservation Archaeology. New York: Academic Press.
  • Schiffer, Michael B., A.P. Sullivan, and Timothy C. Klinger 1978 “The Design of Archaeological Surveys,” World Archae-ology 10: 1–28.
  • Short, Michael J. 1985 “Shovel-Test Sampling as a Site Discovery Technique: A Case Study from Michigan,” Journal of Field Archaeology 12: 458–469.
  • Short, Michael J. 1989 “Shovel-Test Sampling in Archaeological Survey: Com-ments on Nance and Ball, and Lightfoot,” American An-tiquity 54: 396–404.
  • Stone, Glen Davis 1981 “On Artifact Density and Shovel Probes,” Current An-thropology 22: 182–183.
  • Talmage, V., O. Chesler, and I. A. Stoff 1977 “The Importance of Small, Surface, and Distributed Sites as Sources of Significant Archaeological Data,” Cultural Resource Management Series NTIS PB-270939. Washington, D.C.: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.
  • Thomas, David Hurst 1975 “Nonsite Sampling in Archaeology: Up the Creek With-out a Site?,” in J. W. Mueller, ed., Sampling in Archaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 61–81.
  • Wandsnider, LuAnn, and James I. Ebert, eds. 1988 “Issues in Archaeological Surface Survey: MeshingMethod and Theory,” American Archaeology 7: 21.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.