The role of gender in team collaboration and performance

Bibliography

• Jutta Allmendinger, Hackman Richard. 1995. The more, the better? A four-nation study of the inclusion of women in symphony orchestras. Social Forces 74(2): 423–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayle BaughS, Graen GeorgeB. 1997. Effects of team gender and racial composition on perceptions of team performance in cross-functional teams. Group & Organization Management 22: 366–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berdahl JenniferH, Anderson Cameron. 2005. Men, women and leadership centralization in groups over time. Group Dynamics 9: 45–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell LaurenV, Snyder LoriA, Mavriplis Catherine. 2009. Diverse faculty in STEM fields: Attitudes, performance, and fair treatment. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 2(4): 195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickenstaff JacobC. 2005. Women in science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education 17: 369–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers ClintA, Pharmer JamesA, Eduardo Salas. 2000. When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research 31(3): 305–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli LindaL.: 2001. Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues 57(4): 725–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli LindaL. 2010. Gender and group behavior. In Handbook of gender research in psychology, ed. , Chrisler Joan C, McCreary Donald R. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chatman Jennifer A, O’Reilly Charles A. 2004. Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Academy of Management Journal 47: 193–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley Elizabeth A. 2005. How do career strategies, gender, and work environment affect faculty productivity levels in university-based science centers? Review of Policy Research 22(5): 537–655.
   Google Scholar
• Craig Jane M, Sherif Carolyn W. 1986. The effectiveness of men and women in problem-solving groups as a function of group gender composition. Sex Roles 14: 453–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin Catherine, Angela Roger. 1999. Theorizing progress: Women in science, engineering, and technology in higher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36(6): 639–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio John F, Brown Clifford E, Heltman Karen, Ellyson Steve L, Keating Caroline F. 1988. Power displays between men and women in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55: 580–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly Alice H, Johnson Blair T. 1990. Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 108: 233–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely Robin J, Thomas David A. 2001. Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly 46(2): 229–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick Graham D, Neal Derrick J. 2001. Effect of gender composition on group performance. Gender, Work and Organization 8(2): 205–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fox Mary F. 1991. Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity. In The outer circle, ed. , Zuckerman H, Cole J, Bruer J, 188–204. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson Susan E, Aparna Joshi, Erhardt Niclas L. 2003. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management 29: 801–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn Karen A, Northcraft Gregory B, Neale Margaret A, 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(4): 0741–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparna Joshi, 2010. Gender-based effects in ‘team science’: Integrating alter, ego, and team level perspectives. Working paper. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Aparna Joshi, Roh Hyuntak: 2009. The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal 52(3): 599–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter Rosabeth M. 1977. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. The American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 965–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas Kochan, Bezrukova Katerina, Ely Robin, Jackson Susan, Joshi Aparna, Jehn Karen, Leonard Jonathan, Levine David, Thomas David, 2003. The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management 42(1): 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svein Kyvik, Teigen Mari, 1996. Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology, & Human Values 21(1): 54–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau Dora C, Murnighan Keith J, 1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review 23: 325–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cynthia Lee, Farh Jiing-Lih, 2004. Joint effects of group efficacy and gender diversity on group cohesion and performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review 53(1): 136–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcial Losada, Heaphy Emily. 2004. The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams. American Behavioral Scientist 47(6): 740–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannix Elizabeth, Neale MargaretA, 2005. What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 6(2): 31–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larissa Myaskovsky, Unikel Emily, Dew MaryA, 2005. Effects of gender diversity on performance and interpersonal behavior in small work groups. Sex Roles 52(9–10): 645–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. 2009. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Division of Science Resources Statistics, NSF 09-305. Arlington, VA. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd. (21/03/2011)
   Google Scholar
• Pearsall Matthew J, Ellis Alexander PJ, Evans Joel M, 2008. Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: Is activation the key? Journal of Applied Psychology 93(1): 225–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelled Lisa H. 1996. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science 7(6): 615–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelled Lisa H, Eisenhardt Kathleen, Xin Katherine, 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of workgroup diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marianne Schmid-Mast. 2001. Gender differences and similarities in dominance hierarchies in same-gender groups based on speaking time. Sex Roles 44: 537–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhard Sonnert, Fox Mary F, Adkins Kristen. 2007. Undergraduate women in science and engineering: Effects of faculty, fields, and institutions over time. Social Science Quarterly 88: 1333–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart Greg L. 2006. A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management 32(1): 29–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henri Tajfel. 1981. Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taps Judith, Martin Patricia Y. 1990. Gender composition, attributional accounts, and women’s influence and likability in task groups. Small Group Research 21: 471–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber Sheila S, Donahue Lisa M. 2001. Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management 27: 141–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick Kael E, Roberts Karlene H. 1993. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly 38(3): 357–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley Anita W, Chabris Christopher F, Pentland Alexander, Hashmi Nada, Thomas WMalone. 2010. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330:686–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefan Wuchty, Jones BenjaminF, Uzzi Brian. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827): 1036–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar