Interdisciplinary Approaches to Achieving Gendered Innovations in Science, Medicine, and Engineering¹

Bibliography

• American Heart Association (AHA). 2011. Women, heart disease and stroke. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association.
   Google Scholar
• Beery Annaliese K, Zucker Irving. 2011. Sex Bias in Neuroscience and Biomedical Research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3): 565–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susanne Bührer, Schraudner Martina, eds. 2006. Wie können Gender-Aspekte in Forschungsvorhaben erkannt und bewertet werden? Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Institute of Gender and Health. 2003. What’s sex and gender got to do with it? Integrating sex and gender into health research. Ottawa: CIHR Publishing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Strategies and Evaluation Services (CSES). 2009. Monitoring progress towards gender equality in the Sixth Framework Programme. Synthesis report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Marie Csete. 2008. Gender issues in transplantation. Anesthesia and analgesia 107: 232–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings Steven R, Cawthon Peggy M, Ensrud Kristine E, Cauley Jane A, Fink Howard A, Orwoll Eric S. 2006. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and risk of hip and nonvertebral fractures in older men: A prospective study and comparison with older women. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 21: 1550–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The DFG’s research-oriented standards on gender equality. German Research Foundation. http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/grundlagen_dfg_foerderung/chancengleichheit/forschungsorientierte_gleichstellungsstandards_en.pdf. (9/2/11)
   Google Scholar
• Stefan DumaM, Moorcroft DavidM, Gabler HamptonC, Manoogian SarahM, Stitzel JoelD, Duma GregG. 2006. Analysis of pregnant occupant crash exposure and the potential effectiveness of four-point seatbelts in far side crashes. Virginia Tech — Wake Forest Center for Injury Biomechanics Accident Reconstruction Newsletter, March 7.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003a. She figures. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003b. Vademecum: Gender mainstreaming in the Sixth Framework Programme — Reference guide for scientific officers and project officers. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010a. Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative. Innovation Union. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/innovation-union-communication_en.pdf. (10/2/11)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010b. Work Programme, Science in Society, Implementing Structural Change in Research Organisations/Universities.
   Google Scholar
• European Technology Assessment Network (ETAN) Expert Working Group. 2000. Science policies in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ken Faulkner, Orwoll Eric. 2002. Implications in the use of T-scores for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in men. Journal of Clinical Densitometry 5: 87–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendy Faulkner. 2001. The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies. Women’s Studies International Forum 24: 79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendy Faulkner. 2006. Genders in/of engineering. University of Edinburgh Economic and Social Research Council, March 1.
   Google Scholar
• FEMtech. Femtech FTI Projekte. Eine Initiative des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie. http://www.femtech.at/index.php?id=44. (10/2/22)
   Google Scholar
• Gates Foundation. Gender checklist. Knowledge networking for rural development in the Asia-Pacific region (ENRAP). http://www.enrap.org/events/ifad-events/Checklist%20Gender%20Gates%20Foundation%20 April%2008.pdf/at_download/file. (9/2/11)
   Google Scholar
• Gendered Innovations in Science, Medicine, and Engineering. http://www.stanford.edu/group/gender/GenderedInnovations/index.html. (9/2/11)
   Google Scholar
• genSET. 2010. Recommendations for action on the gender dimension in science. London: Portia. http://www. genderinscience.org/resources.html. (21/3/2011)
   Google Scholar
• Bruce Gross, van Wijk Christine, Mukherjee Nilanjana. 2001. Linking sustainability with demand, gender, and poverty: A study in community-managed water supply projects in fifteen countries. Delft, Netherlands: IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Joke Haafkens, Klinge Ineke. 2007. Promoting attention to the gender dimension in health research: Experiences from three centres of excellence in the European Union. Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht Centre for Gender and Diversity and Care and Public Health Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sandra Harding. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nancy Hopkins. 2006. Diversification of a university faculty: Observations on hiring women faculty in the schools of science and engineering at MIT. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) faculty newsletter XVII: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2010. Women’s health research: Progress, pitfalls, and promise. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ineke Klinge. 2008. GenderBasic: Promoting integration of the gender dimension in biomedical and health-related research. Maastricht: Centre for Gender and Diversity, School for Public Health and Primary Care.
   Google Scholar
• Ineke Klinge. 2010. How incorporation of sex and gender in research will lead to better healthcare. In Sex and gender in biomedicine: Theories, methodologies, results, ed. , Ineke Klinge, Wisemann Claudia, 15–33. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Danielle Lavaque-Manty, Stewart Abigail. 2008. A very scholarly intervention: Recruiting women faculty in science and engineering. In Gendered innovations in science and engineering, ed. , Schiebinger Londa, 165–81. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jane Margolis, Fisher Allan. 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lori Mosca, Manson JoAnn E, Sutherland Susan E, Langer Robert D, Manolio Teri, Barrett-Connor Elizabeth. 1997. Cardiovascular disease in women: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 96: 2468–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health (NIH). 1993. Public Law 103–43, Subtitle B, Clinical Research Equity Regarding Women and Minorities.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (NSFa). ADVANCE — Increasing the participation and advancement of women in academic science and engineering careers. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2009/nsf0941/nsf0941.pdf. (9/2/11)
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (NSFb). ADVANCE — Institutional Transformation Awardee Websites. NSF. http://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/advance/itwebsites.jsp. (9/2/11)
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (NSF). 1982. Women and minorities in science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nature Editorial. 2010. Putting gender on the agenda. Nature 465: 665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerome Pearlman, Viano David. 1996. Automobile crash simulation with the first pregnant crash test dummy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 175: 977–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leoine Postma, van Wijk Christine, Otte Corine. 2003. Participatory quantification in the water and sanitation sector. Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) Notes 47: 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Teresa Rees. 2002. National policies on women and science in Europe: A report about women and science in thirty countries. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Research Council of Norway. Researcher Project. Research Council Application Information. http://www. forskningsradet.no/en/Researcher_project/1195592882768. (9/2/11)
   Google Scholar
• Sue Rosser. 1994. Women’s health — missing from US medicine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser Sue V. 2008. Building two-way streets to implement policies that work for gender in science. In Gendered innovations in science and engineering, ed. , Schiebinger Londa, 182–97. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez de Madariaga, Inés. 2011. Director, Women and Science Unit, Ministry of Research, Spain. Personal communication: Spain’s Law of Science, Technology and Innovation, passed March 2011, promotes gender as a ‘category of analysis, so that its relevance is considered in all aspects of the process: definition of priorities of scientific and technological research; of research problems; in theoretical and explanatory frameworks, methods, collection and interpretation of data, and findings’. According to the law, ‘gender shall also be considered in applications and technological developments, and in proposals for future studies’.
   Google Scholar
• Londa Schiebinger. 1989. The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modern science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Londa Schiebinger. 1993. Nature’s body: Gender in the making of modern science. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Londa Schiebinger. 1999. Has feminism changed science? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Londa Schiebinger ed. 2008. Gendered innovations in science and engineering. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Londa Schiebinger, Henderson Andrea D, Gilmartin Shannon K. 2008. Dual-career academic couples: What universities need to know. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martina Schraudner. 2010. Gender and innovation: Fraunhofer ’s ‘discover gender ’ research findings. In The innovation potential of diversity — practical examples for the innovation management, ed. , Spitzley Anne, Ohlhausen Peter, Spath Dieter, 169–82. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Martina Schraudner, Lukoschat Helga eds. 2006. Gender als Innovationspotenzial in Forschung und Entwicklung. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Klaus Schröder. 2010. Gender dimensions of product design. Paper presented at the Gender, Science, and Technology Expert Group meeting of the United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (UN-DAW), 28 September–1 October, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet Mary G, Sweet Jon M, Jeremiah Michael P, Galazaka Sim S. 2009. Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. American Family Physician 3: 193–200.
   Google Scholar
• UN Women. 2011. Gender, Science and Technology, Agreed Conclusions. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/55sess.htm#agreed. (26/3/11)
   Google Scholar
• United States General Accounting Office (US GAO). 2001. Drug safety: Most drugs withdrawn in recent years had greater health risks for women. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ventura Stephanie J, Mosher William D, Curtin Sally C, Abma Joyce C. 2001. Trends in pregnancy rates for the United States, 1976–97: An update. National Vital Statistics Report 49: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Judy Wajcman. 2007. From women and technology to gendered technoscience. Information, Communication, and Society 10: 287–98.
   Google Scholar
• Chelsea Wald, Wu Corinna. 2010. Of mice and women: The bias in animal models. Science 327: 1571–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss Harold B, Songer Thomas J, Fabio Anthony. 2001. Fetal deaths related to maternal injury. Journal of the American Medical Association 286: 1863–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theresa Wizemann, Pardue Mary-Lou, eds. 2001. Exploring the biological contributions to human health: Does sex matter? Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation (WHO). What is Gender Mainstreaming? Gender, Women, and Health. http://www.who.int/gender/mainstreaming/en/index.html. (9/2/11)
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation (WHO). 2002. Integrating gender perspectives in the work of WHO. Geneva: WHO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yellow Window Management Consultants. 2009. Toolkit: Gender in EU-funded research. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker Irving, Beery Annaliese K. 2010. Males still dominate animal studies. Nature 465: 690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar