De-Gendering Neuro-Images: Contingencies in the Construction of Visualization Technologies and Their Use for Establishing Sex-Differences

Bibliography

• Doris Allhutter, Hanappi-Egger Edeltraud. 2006. The hidden social dimensions of technologically centred quality standards: Triple-loop learning as process centred quality approach. In Perspectives in software quality, ed. , Dawson R, Georgiadou E, Linecar P, Ross M, Staples G, 179–95. The British Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Doris Allhutter, Hanappi-Egger Edeltraud. 2008. Deconstructing the social shaping of technology: Mind scripting as research method and as reflection tool. 4S/EASST 2008 ‘Acting with science, technology and medicine’, August 20th-23rd, 2008, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried Böhm. 1994. Was ist ein Bild? München: Fink.
   Google Scholar
• Volker Bosch. 2000. Statistical analysis of multi-subject fMRI data: assessment of focal activations. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 11: 61–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burri Regula V. 2008. Doing images. Zur Praxis medizinischer Bilder. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Larry Cahill. 2006. Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7: 447–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cynthia Cockburn. 1991. Brothers: Male dominance and technological change. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cynthia Cockburn. 1992. The circuit of technology. Gender, identity and power. In Consuming technologies. Media and information in domestic spaces, Chapter 2, ed. , Silverstone Roger, Hirsch Eric, 32–47. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cecile Crutzen2007Ambient intelligence, between heaven and hell. A transformative critical room? InGender Designs IT Construction and Deconstruction of Information Society Technology, Zorn Isabel, et al. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, GWV Fachverlage.
   Google Scholar
• Lorraine Daston, Gallison Peter. 2007. Objectivity. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wendy Faulkner. 2001. The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies. Women’s Studies International Forum 24(1): 79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anne Fausto-Sterling. 2000. Sexing the body. Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Frost Julie A, Binder Jeffrey R, Springer Jane A, Hammeke Thomas A, Bellgowan Patrick SF, Rao Stephen M, Cox Robert W. 1999. Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes. Evidence from functional MRI. Brain 122: 199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eileen Green, Owen Jenny, Pain Den. 1993. Introduction. In Gendered by design?, ed. , Green E, Owen J, Pain D, 1–8. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Frances Grundy. 1996. Women and computers. Exeter: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dominik Haubner, Brüstle Peter, Schinzel Britta, Remmele Bernd, Schirmer Dominique, Holthaus Matthias, Reips Ulf-Dieter. 2009. E-Learning und Geschlechterdifferenzen? Zwischen Selbsteinschätzung, Nutzungsnötigung und Diskurs, 41–50; Waxmann Verlag, Reihe Medien in der Wissenschaft; Band 51, Münster.
   Google Scholar
• Richard Hayward. 2003. Personal view: VOMIT (victims of modern imaging technology) — an acronym for our times. British Medical Journal 326: 1273. http://ctsurgcomplications.wikia.com/wiki/VOMIT
   Google Scholar
• Bettina Heintz, Nadai Eva. 1998. Geschlecht und Kontext. De-Institutionalisie-rungsprozesse und geschlechtliche Differenzierung, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 27(2): 75–93.
   Google Scholar
• Herring Susan C. 1996. Computer mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig Jäger. 2004. Transkription — zu einem medialen Verfahren an den Schnittstellen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses. TRANS — Internetzeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaften no. 15, September. http://www.inst.at/trans/15Nr/06_2/jaeger15.htm. (28/02/2011)
   Google Scholar
• Anelis Kaiser, Kuenzli Esther, Zappatore Daniela, Nitsch Cordula. 2007. On females’ lateral and males’ bilateral activation during language production: a fMRI study. International Journal of Psychophysiology 63: 192–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anelis Kaiser, Haller Sven, Schmitz Sigrid, Nitsch Cordula. 2009. On sex/gender related similarities and differences in fMRI language research. Brain Research Reviews 61: 49–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allan Pease, Pease Barbara. 2001. Why men don’t listen & women can’t read maps. London: Orion.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips Michael D, Lowe Mark J, Lurito Joseph T, Dzemidzic Mario, Mathews Vincent. 2001. Temporal lobe activation demonstrates sex-based differences during passive listening. Radiology 220: 202–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard Remmele, Schirmer Dominique, Brüstle Peter, Haubner Dominik, Holthaus Matthias, Schinzel Britta. 2008. Undoing gender in E-learning. In Proceedings of ECER, Göteborg. www.eera-ecer.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Publication_FULL_TEXTS/ECER2008_187_RemmeleSchirmerHaubner.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Britta Schinzel. 2006. The body in medical imaging between reality and construction. Poiesis und Praxis 4(3): 185–98.
   Google Scholar
• Britta Schinzel. 2009. Recognisability and visual evidence in medical imaging versus scientific objectivity. In Dynamics and performativity of imagination; The image between the visible and the invisible, ed. , Huppauf Bernd, Wulf Christoph, 339–56. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sigrid Schmitz2010 Sex, gender, and the brain — biological determinism versus socio-cultural constructivism. In Gender and sex in biomedicine , Klinge Ineke, Wiesemann Claudia, 57–76. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Shaywitz Bennet A, Shaywitz Sally E, Pugh Kenneth R, Constable Todd R, Skudlarski Pawel, Fulbright Robert K, Bronen Richard A, Fletcher Jack M, Shankweiler Donald P, Katz Leonard, Gore John C. 1995. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 373: 607–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirotin Yevgeniy B, Das Aniruddha. 2009. Anticipatory haemodynamic signals in sensory cortex not predicted by local neuronal activity, Nature 457: 475–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer Iris EC, Aleman André, Bouma Anke, Kahn René S. 2004. Do women really have more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Brain 127: 1845–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer Iris EC, Aleman André, Somers Metten, Boks Marco P, Kahn René S. 2008. Sex differences in handedness, asymmetry of the planum temporale and functional language lateralization. Brain Research 1206: 76–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unterrainer Josef M, Ruff Christian C, Rahm Benjamin, Kaller Christoph P, Spreer Joachim M, Schwarzwald Ralf, Halsband Ulrike. 2005. The influence of sex differences and individual task performance on brain activation during planning. NeuroImage 24(2): 586–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judy Wajcman. 2004. TechnoFeminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriela Winker. 2010. Ko-Materialisierung von vergeschlechtlichten Körpern und technisierten Artefakten. http://www.tu-harburg.de/agentec/winker/pdf/Ko-Materialisierung.pdf. (28/02/2011)
   Google Scholar