12
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Miscellany

The distinctive functions of science and law

Pages 87-90 | Published online: 18 Jul 2013

LITERATURE CITED

  • American Bar Association Journal, 1999, February, 35.
  • American Scientist, 1998, 86, Nov./Dec., 498.
  • H. S. Maine: ‘Religion and law’, in ‘Dissertations on early law and custom’; 1883, London, John Murray.
  • H. C. Lea: ‘Superstition and force’; 1878, Philadelphia, PA, Henry C. Lea.
  • L. Loevinger: ‘Law and science as rival systems’, Univ. Florida Law Rev., 1966 /67, 19, 530.
  • ‘Dictionary of the history of science’, 381; 1981, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
  • See L. Loevinger: ‘Standards of proof in science and law’, Interdisc. Sci. Rev., 1993, 18, 399.
  • Commentary to Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 201.
  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 US 579, 1993.
  • See L. Loevinger: ‘Science as evidence’, Jurimetrics, 1995, 35, 153 and ‘Science as legal evidence’, Interdisc. Sci. Rev., 1995, 20, 335.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.