Morphological and anatomical evidence suggest that 'Hylocomiaceae' taxa belong to at least two clades

References

• Beever J, Allison KW, Child J. 1992. The mosses of New Zealand. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buck WR. 1997. Schofieldiella (Hylocomiaceae), a new genus for an old species. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 82: 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Buck WR. 1998. Pleurocarpous mosses of the West Indies. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 82: 1–400.
   Google Scholar
• Buck WR, Goffinet B, Shaw AJ. 2000a. Novel relationships in pleuro-carpous mosses as revealed by cpDNA sequences. Bryologist 103: 774–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck WR, Goffmet B, Shaw AJ. 2000b. Testing morphological con-cepts of orders of pleurocarpous mosses (Bryophyta) using phylo-genetic reconstructions based on trnL-trnF and rps4 sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16: 180–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum H, Anderson LE. 1981. Mosses of eastern North America. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Luna E, Buck WR, Akiyama H, Arikawa T, Tsubota H, Gonzalez D, Newton AE, Shaw AJ. 2000. Ordinal phylogeny within the Hypnobryalean pleurocarpous mosses inferred from cladistic analyses of three chloroplast DNA sequence data sets: trnL-F, rps4, and rbeL. Bryologist 103: 242–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgadillo M. C, Bello B, Cardenas S. A. 1995. LATMOSS. A cata-logue of Neotropical mosses. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 56: 1–191.
   Google Scholar
• During HJ. 1977. A taxonomical revision of the Garovaglioideae (Pterobryaceae, Musci). Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 12: 1–244.
   Google Scholar
• Enroth J. 1994. A taxonomic monograph of the genus Pinnatella (Neckeraceae, Bryopsida). Acta Botanica Fennica 151: 1–90.
   Google Scholar
• Farris JS. 1988. HENNIG86. Version 1.5.
   Google Scholar
• Farris JS. 1997. “Xac”. Computer program and manual. Stockholm: Distributed by the author, Swedish Museum of Natural History.
   Google Scholar
• Farris JS, Albert VA, Kallersjii M, Lipscomb D, Kluge AG. 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12: 99–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischer M. 1915-1922. Die Musci der Flora von Buitenzorg. Band 4. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Gangulee HC. 1980. Mosses of Eastern India and adjacent regions. Fascicle 8. Calcutta: Gangulee, H. C.
   Google Scholar
• Goloboff PA. 1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9: 83–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenis L. 1989. Some neglected character distribution patterns among the pleurocarpous mosses. Bryologist 92: 157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenfis L. 1995. Higher taxonomic level relationships among diplolepidous pleurocarpous mosses - a cladistic overview. Journal of Bryology 18: 723–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenis L. 1997a. A cladistic overview of the “Hookeriales”. Lindbergia 21: 107–143.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenis L. 1997b. A cladistic overview of the Hookeriales-Sematophyllaceae and some other taxa. Lindbergia 21: 49–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenis L. 1998. An evaluation of phylogenetic relationships among the Thuidiaceae, the Amblystegiaceae, and the temperate members of the Hypnaceae. Lindbergia 22: 101–133.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenis L. 2002. Important complexes of intercorrelated character states in pleurocarpous mosses. Lindbergia 27: 104–121.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenas L. 2003. Amblystegiaceae (Musci). Flora Neotropica Monograph 89: i-iv, 1–107.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenis L, Buck WR. 1999. A phylogenetic analysis of the Sematophyllaceae. Lindbergia 24: 103–132.
   Google Scholar
• Higuchi M. 1985. A taxonomic revision of the genus Gollania Broth. (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 59: 1–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hill MO, Preston CD, Smith AJE. 1994. Atlas of the bryophytes of Britain and Ireland III. Mosses (Diplolepidae). Colchester: Harley Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland RR. 1968. Pleuroziopsidaceae, a new family of mosses. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 31: 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Koponen T. 1971a. Rhytidiadelphus japonicus and R subpinnatus. Hikobia 6: 18–35.
   Google Scholar
• Koponen T. 1971b. The taxonomic status of Rhytidiadelphus yunnanensis. Hikobia 6: 53–56.
   Google Scholar
• Koponen T, Norris DH. 1985. Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. VIII. Hylocomiaceae and Rhytidiaceae (Musci). Acta Botanica Fennica 131: 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton E. 1971. Moss flora of the Pacific Northwest. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Supplement 1: i-xiii, 1-362, Plates 361–195.
   Google Scholar
• Lewinsky-Haapasaari J, Hedenis L. 1998. A cladistic analysis of the moss genus Orthotrichum Hedw. Bryologist 101: 519–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi A. 1972. A revision of the genus Macrothamnium (Musci). Kumamoto Journal of Science. Section 2, Biology 11: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Noguchi A. 1994. Illustrated moss flora of Japan. Part 5. Nichinan-shi: Hattori Botanical Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Norris DH, Ignatov MS. 2000. Observations on stem surface anatomy in Climacium and Pleuroziopsis (Climaciaceae, Musci). Arctoa 9: 151–154.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer JR. 1985a. A generic revision of the Hylocomiaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 59: 241–278.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer JR. 1985b. A phenetic and phylogenetic analysis of the Hylocomiaceae and Rhytidiaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 59: 185–240.
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury GOK. 1955. A handbook of the New Zealand mosses. Royal Society of New Zealand, Bulletin 5: 1–490.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp AJ, Crum H, Eckel PM 1994. The moss flora of Mexico. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 69: 1–1113.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ, Cox CJ, Goffinet B, Buck WR, Boles SB. 2003. Phylogenetic evidence of a rapid radiation of pleurocarpous mosses (Bryophyta). Evolution 57: 2226–2241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ, McDaniel SF, Werner O, Ros RM. 2002. New frontiers in bryology and lichenology. Phylogeography and phylode-mography. Bryologist 105: 373–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan BC, Jia Y. 1999. A preliminary revision of Chinese Sematophyllaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 86: 1–70.
   Google Scholar
• Tsubota H, Arikawa T, Akiyama H, De Luna E, Gonzalez D, Higuchi M, Deguchi H. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of hypnobryalean mosses as inferred from a large-scale dataset of chloroplast rbcL, with special reference to the Hypnaceae and possibly related families. Hikobia 13: 645–665.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderpoorten A, Hedenis L, Cox C, Shaw AJ. 2002. Circumscription, classification, and taxonomy of Amblystegiaceae (Bryopsida) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast sequence data and morphology. Taxon 51: 115–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderpoorten A, Hedenas L, Jacquemart A-L. 2003. Differentiation in DNA fingerprinting and morphology among species of the pleurocarpous moss genus, Rhytidiadelphus (Hylocomiaceae). Taxon 52: 229–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar