47
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Organisational Factors in the Use and Implementation of ICT in Day Services for Adults with Learning Disabilities

Pages 121-136 | Published online: 18 Jul 2013

REFERENCES

  • Aspinall, A. and Hegarty, J.R. (2001). ICT for adults with learning disabilities: an organisation-wide audit. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 365–372.
  • Banes, D. and Walter, R. (2000). Internet for all. London: David Fulton.
  • Banes, D. and Coles, C. (1995). IT for all: developing an IT curriculum for pupils with severe or profound and multiple learning difficulties. London: David Fulton.
  • Brodin, J and Lindstrand, P (2003). What about ICT in special education? Special educators evaluate Information and Communication Technology as a learning tool. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18, 71–87.
  • Busby, M., Jotham, R., Morgan, M. and Field, B. (1988). Computers and adults with learning difficulties in the NewLink project. Part I: The Clay Cross Model. Educare, 31, 9–14.
  • Clay, J, Cooke, B., Jotham, R., Neale, A., Phillips, R. and Quinton, E. (1988). Microcomputer software: NewLink with computers. British Journal of Special Education, 15, 73–75
  • Demetriadis, S., Barbas, A., Molohides, A., Palaigeorgiou, G., Psillos, D., Vlahavas,I. Tsoukalas, I. and Pombortsis, A. (2003). 'Cultures in negotiation': teachers' acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of technology into schools. Computers and Education, 41, 19–37.
  • Department of Health (2001). Valuing People: A new strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st century. White Paper. London: The Stationery Office.
  • Donabedian, A. (2003) An introduction to quality assurance in health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fowler, P (1988). IT Helps: Information Technology for FE students with special needs. London: National Council for Educational Technology.
  • Granger, C.A., Morbey, M.L, Lotherington, H., Owston, R.D. and Wideman, H.H. (2002). Factors contributing to teachers' successful implementation of IT Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 480–488.
  • Hardy, C. (2000). Information and communications technology for all. London: David Fulton.
  • Hardy, C., Ogden, J., Newman, J. and Cooper, S. (2002). Autism and ICT: a guide for teachers and parents. London: David Fulton.
  • Hawkridge, D. and Vincent, T. (1992). Learning difficulties and computers: access to the curriculum. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Hegarty, J.R. (1991). Into the 1990's: the present and future of microcomputers for people with learning difficulties. In: Hegarty J.R. (Ed.). Into the 1990's: the present and future of microcomputers for people with learning difficulties. Shropshire: Change Publications.
  • Hegarty, J.R. and Whittaker, M. (1993). Computers for people with severe learning disabilities. International Journal of Computers in Adult Education and Training, 3,41–51.
  • Jotham, R. and Leicester, D. (1989). Computers and adults with learning difficulties in the NewLink project. Part II: The Derby Model. Educare, 32, 19–25.
  • Li-Tsang, C.W.P, Chan, C.C.H., Lam, C., Hui-Chan, C. and Yeung, S. (2004). Evaluations of an Information and Communication Technology (ICT) training programme for persons with intellectual disabilities. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3118, 1032–1038.
  • Mooij, T. and Smeets, E. (2001). Modelling and supporting ICT implementation in secondary schools. Computers and Education, 36, 265–281.
  • Mumtaz, S. (2000a). Using ICT in schools: a review of the literature on learning, teaching and software evaluation. Warwick, UK: Institute of Education.
  • Mumtaz, S. (2000b). Factors affecting teachers' use of Information and Communications Technology: a review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 319–341.
  • National Council for Educational Technology (1993). Self-respect and independence: ways of using IT to support adults with severe learning difficulties. Coventry: National Council for Educational Technology.
  • Parsons, S., Daniels, H., Porter, J. and Robertson, C. (2004). Developing the use of ICT to enhance community participation with people with learning disabilities. Final report. Merchant's House, Bristol, UK: Home Farm Trust Ltd.
  • Parsons, S., Daniels, H., Porter, J. and Robertson, C. (2006). The use of ICT by adults with learning disabilities in day and residential services. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 31–44.
  • Paveley, S. (1999). Advocacy and self-advocacy. In: Blarnires M. (Ed.). Enabling Technology for Inclusion. London: Paul Chapman.
  • Porter, J., Aspinall, A., Parsons, S., Simmonds, L., Wood, M., Culley, G. and Holroyd, A. (2005). Time to Listen. Disability and Society. 20,575–585
  • Porter J., Parsons, S., and Robertson C. (2006) Time for Review: Supporting the Work of an Advisory Group. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 6, 11–16.
  • Saunders, P (1984). Micros for handicapped users. Whitby, NY: Helena Press.
  • Scrimshaw, P (2002). Total cost of ownership: a review of the literature. Department of Education and Skills: The Stationary Office.
  • Seale, J. (1998). Management issues surrounding the use of microcomputers in adult special education. Innovations in Education and Training International, 35, 29–35.
  • Seale, J. (1991). Through the looking glass - will Alice like what she sees? (pp.109–116). In: Hegarty, J.R. (Ed.). Into the 1990's: the present and future of microcomputers for people with learning difficulties. Shropshire: Change Publications.
  • Selwyn, N. and Gorard, S. (2003). Exploring the 'new' imperatives of technology-based lifelong learning. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 8,73–92.
  • Tolmie, A. (2001). Examining learning in relation to the contexts of use of ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17,235–241.
  • Whittaker, A. and McIntosh, B. (2000). Changing days. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 3–8.
  • Woodward, J. and Rieth, H. (1997). A historical review of technology research in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67, 503–536.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.