References
- Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Suttorp MJ, Buscemi N, Friesen C. Challenges in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:1042–1047.
- Rosner A. Fables or foibles: Inherent problems with RCTs. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003;26:460–467.
- Murphy LS, Reinsch S, Najm WI, Dickerson VM, Seffinger MA, Adams A, Mishra SI. Spinal palpation: The challenges of information retrieval using available databases. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003;26:374–382.
- Montori VM, Swiontowski MF, Cook DJ. Methodological issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Clin Orthop 2003;413:43–54.
- Peach H. Reading systematic reviews. Aust Fam Physician 2002;31:1–5.
- Donelson R. Rapidly Reversible Low Back Pain: An Evidence-Based Pathway to Widespread Recoveries and Savings. Hanover, NH: Self Care First, 2007.
- Spratt K. Statistical relevance. In: Fardon DF, ed. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Spine. 2nd ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2002.
- Huijbregts PA. Clinical prediction rules: Time to sacrifice the holy cow of specificity? J Manual Manipulative Ther 2007;15:5–8.
- Flynn T, Fritz J, Whitman J, Wainner R, Magel J, Rendeiro D, et al. A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation. Spine 2002;27:2835–2843.
- Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, Irrgang JJ, Johnson KK, Majkowski GR, Delitto A. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:920–928.
- Beattie P, Nelson R. Clinical prediction rules: What are they and what do they tell us? Aust J Physiother 2006;52:157–163.