The Effect of an Analgesic Mobilization Technique When Applied at Symptomatic or Asymptomatic Levels of the Cervical Spine in Subjects with Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

REFERENCES

• Freburger JK, Carey TS, Holmes GM. Management of back and neck pain: Who seeks care from physical therapists? Phys Ther 2005; 85:868–872.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenborn FM. Manuelle Therapie nach Kaltenborn, Untersuchung und Behandlung, Teil I Extremitäten. 12th ed. Oslo, Norway: Norlis, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenborn FM. Manual Mobilization of the Joints. Volume II: The Spine. 4th ed. Oslo, Norway: Norlis, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Chiradejnant A, Latimer J, Maher CG, Step-kovitch N. Does the choice of spinal level treated during posteroanterior (PA) mobilisation affect treatment outcome? Physiother Theory Pract 2002; 18:165–174.
   Google Scholar
• Schomacher J. Physiotherapeutische Tests zur Symptomlokalisation im HWS-Bereich, Teil 1. Manuelle Therapie 2006; 10:60 a-68a.
   Google Scholar
• Schomacher J. Physiotherapeutische Tests zur Symptomlokalisation im HWS-Bereich, Teil 2. Manuelle Therapie 2006; 10:108 b–118b.
   Google Scholar
• Jull G, Bogduk N, Marsland A. The accuracy of manual diagnosis for cervical zygapophysial joint pain syndromes. Med J Aust 1988; 148:233–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilke A, Wolf U, Gotthardt M. Darstellung von Blockierungen der Wirbelsäule im Knochenszintigramm (SPECT). Biomedizinische Technik 2000; 45:206–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall T, Robinson K. The flexion-rotation test and active cervical mobility: A comparative measurement study in cervicogenic headache. Man Ther 2004; 9:197–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pool JJ, Hoving JL, de Vet HC, van Mameren H, Bouter LM. The interexaminer reproducibility of physical examination of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004; 27:84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas M, Groupp E, Panzer D, Partna L, Lumsden S, Aickin M. Efficacy of cervical endplay assessment as an indicator for spinal manipulation. Spine 2003; 28:1091–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubka MJ, Phelan SP. Interexaminer reliability of palpation for cervical spine tenderness. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1994; 7: 591–595.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson N. Measuring cervical muscle tenderness: A study of reliability. J Manipulative Physiolol Ther 1995; 18:88–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöps P, Pfingsten M, Siebert U. Reliabilität manualmedizinischer Untersuchungstechniken an der Halswirbelsäule: Studie zur Qualitätssicherung in der manuellen Diagnostik. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie 2000; 138:2–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strender LE, Lundin J, Nell K. Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of the neck. J Manipulative Physiolol Ther 1997; 20:516–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowbotham MC. What is a “clinically meaningful” reduction in pain? Pain 2001; 94:131–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jull G, Magarey M, Niere K, Elvey R. Physiotherapy: A responsible profession to use cervical manipulation. Response to Ref-shauge, et al. Aust J Physiother 2002; 48:180–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs M, Closs JS. A descriptive study of theuse of visual analogue scales and verbal rating scales for the assessment of postoperative pain in orthopedic patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999; 18:438–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell G. The Back Pain Revolution. 1st ed. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Schomacher J. Diagnostik und Therapie des Bewegungsapparates in der Physiotherapie. 1st ed. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme Verlag, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Magarey ME, Rebbeck T, Coughlan B, Grimmer K, Rivett DA, Refshauge K. Premanipulative testing of the cervical spine review, revision and new clinical guidelines. Man Ther 2004; 9:95–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivett DA, Sharples KJ, Milburn PD. Effect of premanipulative tests on vertebral artery and internal carotid artery blood flow: A pilot study. J Manipulative Physiolol Ther 1999; 22:368–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross AR, Kay TM, Kennedy C, et al. Clinical practice guideline on the use of manipulation or mobilization in the treatment of adults with mechanical neck disorders. Man Ther 2002; 7:193–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerry R, Taylor A, Mitchel J, et al. Cervical artery insufficiency and manipulative therapy: A literature review. Manipulation Association of Chartered Physiotherapist 2005; Nov:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes MJ. Vertebral arteries and cervical movement: Doppler ultrasound velocimetry for screening before manipulation. J Manipulative Physiolol Ther 2002; 25:556–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöps P, Seichert N, Schenk M, Petri U, Senn E. Altersund geschlechtsspezifische Bewegungsausmaße der Halswirbelsäule. Phys Rehab Kur Med 1997; 7:80–87.
   Google Scholar
• Childs JD, Flynn TW, Fritz JM, et al. Screening for vertebrobasilar insufficiency in patients with neck pain: Manual therapy decision-making in the presence of uncertainty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35:300–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss J, Creighton D, Ely JD, Podlewska-Ely J. The immediate effects of upper thoracic translatoric spinal manipulation on cervical pain and range of motion: A randomized clinical trial. J Man Manipulative Ther 2008; 16:93–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cleland JA, Childs JD, McRae M, Palmer JA, Stowell T. Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation in patients with neck pain: A randomized clinical trial. Man Ther 2005; 10:127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Glynn P, Whitman JM, Eberhart SL, MacDonald C, Childs JD. Short-term effects of thrust versus nonthrust mobilization/manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in patients with neck pain: A randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2007; 87:431–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross AR, Hoving JL, Haines TA, et al. Cochrane review for manipulation and mobilization for mechanical neck disorders. Spine 2004; 29:1541–1548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refshauge KM, Parry S, Shirley D, Larsen D, Rivett DA, Boland R. Professional responsibility in relation to cervical spine manipulation. Aust J Physiother 2002; 48:171–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL, Bouter LM. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: A systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Spine J 2004; 4:335–356.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross AR, Kay T, Hondras M, et al. Manual therapy for mechanical neck disorders: A systematic review. Man Ther 2002; 7:131–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomacher J. Schmerz—Entstehung, Leitung, Verarbeitung und physiotherapeutische Beeinflussung, Teil 1. Manuelle Therapie 2001; 5:93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Schomacher J. Schmerz—Entstehung, Leitung, Verarbeitung und physiotherapeutische Beeinflussung, Teil 2. Manuelle Therapie 2001; 5:112–120.
   Google Scholar
• Melzack R, Wall PD. The Challenge of Pain. 2nd ed. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Zusman M, Moog-Egan M. Neurologisch begründete mechanismen der schmerzlinderung durch physiotherapie. In Angewandte Physiologie, 4 Schmerz Verstehen und Beeinflussen. 1st ed. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kulig K, Landel RF, Powers CM. Assessment of lumbar spine kinematics using dynamic MRI: A proposed mechanism of sagittal plane motion induced by manual posterior-to-anterior mobilization. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004; 34:57–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods. Pain 1986; 27:117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar