Reproducibility of global three-dimensional motion during manual atlanto-axial rotation mobilization: an in vitro study

References

• Klein P, Broers C, Feipel V, Salvia P, van Geyt B, Dugailly PM, et al. Global 3D head-trunk kinematics during cervical spine manipulation at different levels. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18: 827–31.
   Google Scholar
• Feipel V, van Geyt B, Dugailly PM, Lepers Y, Klein P, Rooze M. The use of 3D electrogoniometry to assess kinematics outcome of various manual techniques functional and cervical spine. Arch Physiol Biochem 2000;108: 205–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triano JJ, Schultz AB. Motions of the head and thorax during neck manipulations. J Manip Physiol Ther 1994;17: 573–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pool JJ, Hoving JL, de Vet HC, van Mameren H, Bouter LM. The interexaminer reproducibility of physical examination of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004;27: 84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell JA. Changes in vertebral artery blood flow following normal rotation of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003;26: 347–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedmark V, Wallin M, Arvidsson I. Inter-examiner reliability in assessing passive intervertebral motion of the cervical spine. Man Ther 2000;5: 97–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strender LE, Lundin M, Nell K. Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of the neck. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1997;20: 516–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hertogh W, Vaes P, Vijverman V, de Cordt A, Duquet W. The clinical examination of neck pain patients: the validity of a group of tests. Man Ther 2007;12: 50–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piche M, Benoit P, Lambert J, Barrette V, Grondin E, Martel J, et al. Development of a computerized intervertebral motion analysis of the cervical spine for clinical application. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30: 38–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerveri P, Pedotti A, Ferrigno G. Non-invasive approach towards the in vivo estimation of 3D inter-vertebral movements: methods and preliminary results. Med Eng Phys 2004;26: 841–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panjabi mM, Summers DJ, Pelker RR, Videman T, Friedlaender GE, Southwick WO. 3-dimensional load-displacement curves due to forces on the cervical-spine. J Orthop Res 1986;4: 152–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panjabi MM, Oda T, Crisco JJ, Dvorak J, Grob D. Posture affects motion coupling patterns of the upper cervical-spine. J Orthop Res 1993;11: 525–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne N. Composite motion in cervical disc segments. Clin Biomech 1993;8: 193–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianuzzi A, Khalsa PS. High loading rate during spinal manipulation produces unique facet joint capsule strain patterns compared with axial rotations. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005;28: 673–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattrysse E, Baeyens JP, Kool P, Clarys JP, van Roy P. In vitro 3D-arthrokinematic analysis of axial rotation and lateral bending mobilization of the upper cervical spine: analysis of coupled motions by cross-correlation, ratio and phase shift characteristics. In: Proceeding of 9th International Conference on 3D analysis of human movement. Valenciennes: LAMIH; 2006, http://www.univ-valenciennes.fr/congres/3D2006/Abstracts/155-Cattrysse.pdf (only available on line or digital).
   Google Scholar
• Cattrysse E, Baeyens JP, Kool P, Clarys JP, van Roy P. Does manual mobilization influence motion coupling patterns in the atlanto-axial joint? J Electromyogr Kinesiol 20ö8;18: 838–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cattrysse E, Baeyens JP, Clarys JP, van Roy P. Threedimensional kinematics of manual upper cervical mobilization. Part 1: an in vitro analysis of manual flexion-extension mobilization of the atlanto-occipital joint. Man Ther 2007;12: 342–52.
   Google Scholar
• Cattrysse E, Baeyens JP, Clarys JP, van Roy P. Threedimensional kinematics of manual upper cervical mobilization. Part 2: an in vitro analysis of manual axial rotation and lateral bending mobilization of the atlanto-axial joint. Man Ther 2007;12: 353–62.
   Google Scholar
• Cattrysse E, Provyn S, Gagey O, Kool P, Clarys JP, van Roy P. Reproducibility of kinematic motion coupling parameters during manual upper cervical axial rotation mobilization: a 3-dimensional in vitro study of the atlanto-axial joint. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009;19: 93–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilke HJ, Krishchak S, Claes LE. Formalin fixation strongly influences biomechanical properties of the spine. J Biomech 1996;29: 1629–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panjabi MM, Krag M, Summers D, Videman T. Biomechanical time-tolerance of fresh cadaveric human spine specimens. J Orthop Res 1985;3: 292–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SF, Teng CC, Lin KH. Measurement of cervical range of motion pattern during cyclic neck movement by an ultrasoundbased motion system. Man Ther 2005;10: 68–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion part 1: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech 2002;35: 543–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson F. Interexaminer reliability of lumbar segmental mobility tests. Man Ther 2006;11: 331–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachingwe AF, Phillips BJ. Inter-and intrarater reliability of a back range of motion instrument. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86: 2347–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billis EV, Foster NE, Wright CC. Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in locating spinal levels by palpation. Man Ther 2003;8: 223–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjornsdottirt SV, Kumar S. Posteroanterior motion test of a lumbar vertebra: accuracy of perception. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25: 170–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen HW, Vach W, Vach K, Manniche C, Haghfelt T, Hartvigsen L, et al. Palpation of the upper thoracic spine: an observer reliability study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25: 285–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent-Smith B, Gibbons P. Inter-examiner and intra-examiner reliability of the standing flexion test. Man Ther 1999;4: 87–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawk C, Phongphua C, Bleecker J, Swank L, Lopez D, Rubley T. Preliminary study of the reliability of assessment procedures for indications for chiropractic adjustments of the lumbar spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;22: 382–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Troyanovich SJ. Three-dimensional spinal coupling mechanics: Part II. Implications for chiropractic theories and practice. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998;21: 177–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panzer DM. The reliability of lumbar motion palpation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992;15: 518–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seffinger MA, Najm WI, Mishra SI, Adams A, Dickerson VM, Murphy LS, et al. Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: a systematic review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29: E413–25.
   Google Scholar
• Stochkendahl MJ, Christensen HW, Hartvigsen J, Vach W, Haas M, Hestbaek L, et al. Manual examination of the spine: a systematic critical literature review of reproducibility. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006;29: 475–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Solinger AB, Poncet JF, Lantz CA. Meta-analysis of normative cervical motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24: 1571–8.
   Google Scholar