References
- Lock S. Fraud in medical research. Nurs Times Research. 1997;2:161–3.
- Baerlocher M, O’Brien J, Newton M, Gautam T, Noble J. Data integrity, reliability, and fraud in medical research. Eur J Intern Med. 2010;21:40–5.
- Moore N, Juillet Y, Bertoye PH. Integrity of scientific data: transparency of clinical trial data. Therapie. 2007;62:211–6.
- Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? J Med Ethics. 2011;37:249–53.
- Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? J Med Ethics. 2011;37:113–7.
- Stewart WW, Feder N. The integrity of the scientific literature. Nature. 1987;325:207–14.
- Claxton LD. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud? Mutat Res. 2005;589:17–30.
- Miller DR. Publication fraud: implications to the individual and to the specialty. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:154–9.
- Heinemann L. Are all clinical studies sponsored by industry not valid? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2:1161–63.
- Cook C. Mode of administration bias. J Man Manip Ther. 2010;18(2):61–3.
- Jureidini JN, McHenry LB. Conflicted medical journals and the failure of trust. Account Res. 2011;18:45–54.
- Committee on Publication Ethics. Flow Charts [document on the Internet]. UK [cited 2011 August 2]. Available from: http://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts.
- Committee on Publication Ethics. Flow Charts [document on the Internet]. UK [cited 2011 August 2]. Available from: http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/03A_Fabrication_Submitted.pdf.
- Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. Peer Review. Post Notes. 2002;182:1–4.
- Dougherty M. Open peer review: a first step. Nurs Res. 2004;53:213.
- An array of errors: misconduct in science. Economist. 2011;Sept:91–2.