Does training with traditionally presented and virtually simulated tasks elicit differing changes in object interaction kinematics in persons with upper extremity hemiparesis?

References

• Kwakkel G, Kollen B. Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(5):453–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51(1):S225–S239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf S, Winstein C, Miller J, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke. JAMA. 2006;296:2095–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boake C, Noser EA, Ro T, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy during early stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(1):14–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, Jansen-Troy A, Leonhardt S. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (9):CD008349.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Krebs H. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(2):111–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluet GG, Merians AS, Qinyin Q, Adamovich SV. Sensorimotor training in virtual environments produces similar outcomes to real world training with greater efficiency. Paper presented at: International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR) 2013; August 26–29, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke. 2013;41(7):1477–1484.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14(2):52–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merians A, Fluet GG, Qiu Q, Saleh S, Lafond I, Adamovich SV. Robotically facilitated virtual rehabilitation of arm transport integrated with finger movement in persons with hemiparesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011;8:27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housman S, Scott K, Reinkensmeyer D. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(5):505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs HI, Mernoff S, Fasoli SE, Hughes R, Stein J, Hogan N. A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23(1):81–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brokaw EB, Nichols D, Holley RJ, Lum PS. Robotic therapy provides a stimulus for upper limb motor recovery after stroke that is complementary to and distinct from conventional therapy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28(4):367–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klamroth-Marganska V, Blanco J, Campen K, et al. Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(2):159–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian S, Klein J, Burdet E. Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function. Curr Opin Neurol. 2013;23(6):661–670.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelsen SM, Magdalon EC, Levin MF. Grip aperture scaling to object size in chronic stroke. Motor Control. 2009;13(2):197–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Wittenberg GF. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(8):923–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirelman A, Bonato P, Deutsch JE. Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke. Stroke. 2009;40(1):169–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian SK, Lourenco CB, Chilingaryan G, Sveistrup H, Levin MF. Arm motor recovery using a virtual reality intervention in chronic stroke: randomized control trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(1):13–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kordelaar J, van Wegen EEH, Nijland RHM, Daffertshofer A, Kwakkel G. Understanding adaptive motor control of the paretic upper limb early poststroke: the EXPLICIT-stroke Program. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(9):854–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum P, Mulroy S, Amdur R, Requejo P, Prilutsky B, Dromerick A. Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16(4):237–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY, Liing RJ, Chen HC, Chen CL, Lin KC. Arm and trunk movement kinematics during seated reaching within and beyond arm's length in people with stroke: a validity study. Phys Ther. 2014;94(6):845–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluet GG, Merians AS, Qiu Q, Davidow A, Adamovich SV. Comparing integrated training of the hand and arm with isolated training of the same effectors in persons with stroke using haptically rendered virtual environments, a randomized clinical trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR. Post-stroke hemiplegia assessment of physical properties. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1980;7:85–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobkin BH. Recommendations for publishing case studies of cell transplantation for spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(8):687–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2009;89(8):840–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl–Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012;92(6):791–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, et al. The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19(3):194–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Lin KC, Chang YF, Chen CL, Liu JS. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1386–1391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schettino LF, Adamovich SV, Hening W, Tunik E, Sage J, Poizner H. Hand preshaping in Parkinson's disease: effects of visual feedback and medication state. Exp Brain Res. 2006;168(1–2):186–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamovich SV, Berkinblit MB, Hening W, Sage J, Poizner H. The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets in Parkinson's disease. Neuroscience. 2001;104(4):1027–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar