Exposure Assessment: Recommendations for Nanotechnology-Based Pesticides

References

• Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. Title 7, United States Code. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides. United Nations. 2002. Available at http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/tem-plates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/Code/code.pdf;accessedonFebruary2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bombelli FB, Monopoli MP, Lynch I, Dawson KA. What the cell sees in bionanoscience. J Am Chem Soc. 2010; 132: 5761–5768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzma J, VerHage P. Nanotechnology in agriculture and food production: Anticipated applications. Woodrow Wilson Interna-tional Center for Scholars. [Internet] 2006 [cited 2010 Feb]. Available at: http://www.nanotechproject.org/file_download/files/PEN4_AgFood.pdf..
   Google Scholar
• Mittal A, Erdmann E, Bennett D, Capaccio A, Crothers N, Gilbert C, Guggolz G, Harkin N, Raheb K, Tran H. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Environment and Public Works, US Senate. Report No. GA0-10-549. Nanotechnology: Nanoma-terials are widely used in commerce, but EPA faces challenges in regulating risk. Washington (DC): Government Accountability Office; 2010 May.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang C, Joo YL, Frey MW. Nanocomposite fibers electrospun from poly(lactic acid)/cellulose nanocrystals. J Biobased Mat Bioenergy. 2009; 3: 147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai F, Wissing S, Muller R, Fadda A. Artemisia arborescens L essential oil-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for potential agri-cultural application: Preparation and characterization. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2006; 7: E10–E8.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament Council. Directive 98/8/EC of the Euro-pean Parliament and of the Council of 161 February 1998 con-cerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. OJL 123.24.4.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Follow-up to the 6th Meeting of the REACH Competent Authorities for the implementation of Reg-ulation (EC) 1907/2006 (REACH). Coc. CA/59/2008 Rev. 1; Brussels. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Davies JC. Oversight of next generation nanotechnology. Wash-ington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. [Internet] 2009 [cited 2010 Feb]. Available at: http://www.nan-otechproject.org/process/assets/files/7316/pen-18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ETC Group. Down on the farm: The Impact of nano-scale tech-nologies on food and agriculture. [Internet, cited 2010 Feb]. Ottawa, Canada; 2004. Available at: http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/80/02/etc_dotfarm2004.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Harper S, Usenko C, Hutchison J, Maddux B, Tanguay R. Proac-tively designing nanomaterials to enhance performance and minimize hazard. Int J Nanotechnol. 2008; 5: 124–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper S, Usenko C, Hutchison J, Maddux B, Tanguay R. In vivo biodistribution and toxicity depends on nanomaterial composi-don, size, surface functionalization and route of exposure. J Exp Nanosci. 2008; 3: 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper S, Hutchison J, Maddux B, Tanguay R. Integrative strategies to understand nanomaterial-biological interactions. International Environmental Nanotechnology Conference: Applications and Implications. Chicago, IL: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrovolskaia M, Clogston J, Neun B, Hall” Patri A, McNeil S. Method for analysis of nanoparticle hemolytica properties in vitro. Nano Lett. 2008; 8: 2180–2187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Stated Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Guide-lines for exposure assessment. Risk Assessment Forum. Wash-ington, DC: EPA 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Ross J, Dong M, Krieger R. Conservatism in pesticide exposure assessment. Reg Toxicol Pharm. 2000; 31: 53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konradsen F, Hoek Wvd, Cole D, Hutchinson G, Daisley H, Singh S, Eddleston M. Reducing acute poisoning in developing countries-Options for restricting the availability of pesticides. Toxicol. 2003; 192: 249–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone D, Sudakin D, Jenkins J. Longitudinal trends in organophosphate incidents reported to the National Pesticide Information Center, 1995-2007. Environ Health. 2009; 8: 18–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemley AT, Hedge A, Obendorf SK, Hon S, Kim J, Muss TM, Varner CJ. Selected pesticide residues in house dust from farm-ers' homes in Central New York State, USA. Bullet Environ Contam Toxicol. 2002; 69: 155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe HR. Field exposure to airborne pesticides. In: Lee R, ed. Air pollution from pesticides and agricultural processes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Lademann J, Weigmann H, Rickmeyer C, Barthelmes H, Schae-fer H, Mueller G. Penetration of titanium dioxide microparticles in a sunscreen formulation into the horny layer and the follicu-lar orifice. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol. 1999; 12: 247–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvarez-Roman R, Naik A, Kalia Y, Guy R, Fessi H. Skin penetra-don and distribution of polymeric nanoparticles. J Controlled Releases. 2004; 99: 53–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Nano-technology white paper. Office of the Science Advisor. 100/B-07/001. Washington, DC: EPA; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hillyer J, Albrecht R. Gastrointestinal presorption and tissue dis-tribution of differently sized colloidal gold nanoparticles. J Pharmacol Sci. 2001; 90: 1927–1936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. Oxford, England: Pergamon, Elsevier Science 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Jaga K, Dharmani C. Ocular toxicity from pesticide exposure: A recent review. Environ Health Prey Med. 2006; 11: 102–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zimmer A, Kreuter J. Microspheres and nanoparticles used in ocular delivery systems. Adv Drug Del Res. 1995; 16: 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• De Campos A, Sanchez A, Alonso M. Chitosan nanoparticles: A new vehicle for the improvement of the delivery of drugs to the ocular surface. Int J Pharm. 2001; 224: 159–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster G, Maynard A, Donaldson K et al. Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from expo-sure to nanomaterials: Elements of a screening strategy. Particle Fiber Toxicol. 2005; 2: 8.
   Google Scholar
• Pekkanen J, Timonen K, Ruuskanen J, Reponen A, Mirme A. Effects of ultrafine and fine particles in urban air and respira-tory health among children with asthmatic symptoms. Environ Res. 1997; 74: 24–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalupa D, Morrow P, Oberdörster G, Utell M, Framptom M. Ultrafine particle deposition in subjects with asthma. Environ Health Perspect. 2004; 112: 879–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Wilson J, Hiller F. Respiratory tract deposition of ultrafine particles in subjects with obstructive or restrictive lung disease. Chest. 1990; 97: 1115–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J. Zeman K, Bennett W. Ultrafine particle deposition and clearance in the healthy and obstructed lung. Am J Respir Grit Care Med. 2002; 166: 1240–1247.
   Google Scholar
• Pope CA, Burnett RT, Thurston GD et al. Cardiovascular mor-tality and long-term exposure to particulate air pollution: Epi-demiological evidence of general pathophysiological pathways of disease. Circulation. 2004; 109: 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ruckerl R, Ibald-Mulli A, Koenig Wet al. Air pollution and mark-ers of inflammation and coagulation in patients with coronary heart disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006; 173: 432–441.
   Google Scholar
• Costa LG, Richter RJ, Li WF, Cole T, Guizzetti M, Furlong CE. Paraoxonase (PON 1) as a biomarker of susceptibility for organophosphate toxicity. Biomarkers. 2003; 8: 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santucci K, Shah B. Association of naphthalene with acute hemolytic anemia. Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7: 42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das R, Steege A, Baron S, Beckman J, Harrison R. Pesticide-related illness among migrant farm workers in the United States. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2001; 7: 303–312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppin JA, Adgate JL, Eberhart M, Nishioka M, Ryan PB. Envi-ronmental exposure assessment of pesticides in farmworker homes. Environ Health Perspect. 2006; 114: 929–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. [Internet] 2010 [cited 2010 Feb]; Available at: http://www.nanotechprojectorg/inventories/consumer/background/selection.
   Google Scholar
• Nanoparticle Characterization (MINChar) 2010. [Internet, cited 2010 Feb]. Available at: http://characterizationmatters.org.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2008. Environment Directorate-Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology, Series on the Safety of Manufac-tured Nanomaterials, Number 6. Document #ENV/JM/MONO (2008) 13/REV.
   Google Scholar
• Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster” Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of untrafine par-ticles. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113: 823–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover M, Stefaniak A, Day G, Geraci C. Exposure assessment considerations for nanoparticles in the workplace. In: Monteiro-Riviere NA, Tran CL, eds. Nanotoxicology: Characterization, dosing and health effects. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Nemmar A, Hoet PH, Vanquickenborne B, Dinsdale D, Thomeer M, Hoylaerts MF, Vanbilloen H, Mortelmans L, Nemery B. Passage of inhaled particles into the blood circula-tion in humans. Circulation. 2002; 105: 411–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takenaka S, Karg E, Roth C, Schulz H, Ziesenis A, Heinzmann U, Schramel P, Heyder J. Pulmonary and systemic distribution of inhaled ultrafine silver particles in rats. Environ Health Per-spect. 2001; 109: 547–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Risk mitigation options to address bystander and occupational expo-sures from soil fumigant applications. EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0123-0282. Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances. Washington, DC: EPA; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Martin A, Bernas L, Rutt B, Foster P, Gillies E. Enhanced cell uptake of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles func-tionalized with dendritic guanidines. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008; 19: 2375–2384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia G, Kimbell J. Deposition of inhaled nanoparticles in the rat nasal passages: dose to the olfactory region. Inhalation Tox-icol. 2009; 21: 1165–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez JM, Gonzalez C, Maestro A, Sole I, Pey CM, Nolla J. Nanoemulsions: New applications and optimization of their preparation. Current Opinion Colloid Interface Sci. 2008; 13: 245–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Li X, Zhang G, Dong J, Eastoe J. Oil-in-water nano-emulsions for pesticide formulations. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2007; 314: 230–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Approaches to safe nanotechnology. Atlanta, GA: United States Department of Health and Human Services 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Murashov V, Howard J. Biosafety, occupational health and nantechnology. Appl Biosafety. 2007; 12: 158–167.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Scientific Advisory Panel. Evaluation of the hazard and expo-sure associated with nanosilver and other nanometal pesticide products. EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0683. Arlington, VA: EPA; 2007.
   Google Scholar