A Systematic Review of Methods to Measure Balance and Walking Post-Stroke. Part 1: Ordinal Scales

REFERENCES

• Ballinger C, Ashburn A, Low J, Roderick P. Unpacking the black box of therapy — a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13:301–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon S, Ashburn A. The Bobath Concept in stroke rehabilitation; a focus group study of experienced physiotherapists’ perspective. Disab Rehab 2000; 22:665–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge C. Evaluation of physiotherapy for people with stroke. Kings Fund: London, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Ashburn A. A review of current physiotherapy in the management of stroke. In: Harrison MA (ed.) Physiotherapy in stroke management. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Effective Health Care Bulletin No. 2. Stroke Rehabilitation. Leeds University Printing Service, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Ashburn A, Partridge C, De Souza L. Physiotherapy in the rehabilitation of stroke: A review. Clin Rehabil;7:337–45
   Google Scholar
• Partridge C, Cornall C, Lynch M, Greenwood R. Physical Therapies. In: Greenwood R, Barnes M, McMillan T, Ward C (eds) Neurological Rehabilitation, London: Mosby Hall, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G. Dynamics in functional recovery after stroke. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L. The effectiveness of rehabilitation; a critical review of the evidence, introduction. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13(suppl 1):3–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans M, Goldie P, Hill K. Systematic and random error in repeated measurements of temporal and distance parameters of gait after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78:725–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeurrisse G, Demol O & Robaye E (1980). Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neur 1980; 19:382–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladman J, Lincoln N, & Adams SA. Use of the extended ADL scale with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1993b; 22:419–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight C & Rockwood K. A hierarchical assessment of balance and mobility. Age Ageing 1995; 24:126–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith R. Validation and reliability of the Elderly Mobility Scale. Physiotherapy 1994; 80:744–7
   Google Scholar
• Streiner D & Norman G. Health Measurement Scales; A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, 2nd ed. Oxford Medical Publications, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Collen F, Wade DT, Bradshaw C. Mobility after stroke; reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disab Stud 1990; 12:6–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fugel-Meyer A, Jaakso L, Leyman I. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient; A method for evaluation for physical performance. Scan J Rehabil Med 1975; 7:13–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr J, Shepherd R, Nordholm R, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 1985; 65:175–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams J, Gayton D. Measuring balance in the elderly; preliminary development of an instrument. Phys Can 1989 41:304–41
   Google Scholar
• Linmark B, Hamrin E. Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention. Presentation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment and its reliability. Scan J Rehabil Med 1988; 20:103–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benaim C, Perennou D, Villy J, Rousseaux M, Pelissier J. Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients: The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS). Stroke 1999; 30:1862–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln N, Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1979; 65:48–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ashburn A. A physical assessment for stroke patients (1982). Physiotherapy 68:109–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: A pilot reliability study. JNNP 1990; 53:576–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan N, Finn A. Motor recovery following stroke: A basis for evaluation Disab Rehab 1997;19:64–70
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwboer A Feys H, De Weerdt W, Nuyens G, DeCorte E. Developing a clinical tool to measure sitting balance after stroke: A reliability study. Physiotherapy 1995;81:439–45
   Google Scholar
• Sandin K & Smith B. The measure of balance in sitting in stroke rehabilitation prognosis. Stroke 1990; 21:82–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon R, Smith M & Larkin P. Relationship between independent sitting balance and side of hemiplegia. Phys Ther 1986; 66:944–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon R. Lateral trunk flexion strength; impairment, measurement reliability and implications following unilateral brain lesions. Int J Rehab Res 1992; 15:249–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feigin L, Sharon B, Czaczkes B, Rosin A. Sitting equilibrium two weeks after a stroke can predict walking ability at six months. Gerontology 1996; 42:348–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, Van Hullenaar S. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment. Stroke 1993; 24:58–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabell A, Simons M. Balance coding. Physiotherapy 1982; 68:286–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohannon R, Walsh S, Joseph M. Ordinal and timed balance measurements; reliability and validity in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1993; 7:9–13
   Google Scholar
• Partridge C, Johnston M & Edwards S. Recovery from physical disability after stroke; Normal patterns as a basis for evaluation. Lancet 1987; i: 373–5
   Google Scholar
• Simondson J, Goldie P, Brock K, Nosworthy J. The Mobility Scale for Acute Stroke Patients; Intra and inter-rater reliability. Clin Rehabil 1996; 10:295–300
   Google Scholar
• Daley K, Mayo N, Danys I, Cabot R, Wood-Dauphinee S. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM); refining and validating the content. Phys Can 1997; 49:4269–78
   Google Scholar
• Perry J Garrett M, Gronley J, Mulroy S. Classification of Walking Handicap in the stroke Population. Stroke 1995;26:982–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith M, Baer G. Achievement of simple mobility milestones after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80:4420–7
   Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Hamilton B, Sherwin F. Guide for the use of the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation. New York, 1986
   Google Scholar
• Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl- Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired: reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984; 64:35–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord SE, Halligan PW, Wade DT. Visual gait analysis: The development of a clinical assessment and scale. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12:107–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan P, Propst M, Nelson S. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensori-motor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther 1983; 63:1606–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiFabio R, Badke M. Relationship of sensory organisation to balance function in patients with hemiplegia. Phys Ther 1990; 70:542–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandford J, Moreland J, Swanson P, Gowland C. Reliability of the Fugel-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther 1993; 73:447–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckerman H, Vogelaar T, Lankhorst G, Verbeek A. A criterion for stability of motor function of the lower extremity in stroke patients using the Fugel-Meyer Assessment. Scan J Rehabil Med 1996; 28:3–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dettmann M, Linder M, Sepic S. Relationships between walking performance, postural stability and functional assessments of the hemiplegic patient. Am J Phys Med 1987; 66:77–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poole J, Whitney S. Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients: Concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69:195–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams J, Shapiro S. Examining outcome measures in a clinical study of stroke. Stroke 1990; 21:731–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malouin F, Pichard L, Bonneau C, Durand A, Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke; comparison of the Fugel Meyer Assessment and Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:1206–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Carlsson J, Grimby G, Nordholm L. Assessment of walking, balance and sensori-motor performance of hemi- paretic patients in the acute stage after stroke. Phys Theory Prac 1998; 14:149–57
   Google Scholar
• Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedure in hemiplegia based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther 1966; 46:357–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linmark B, Hamrin E. Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention. Validation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment. Scan J Rehab 1988; 20:111–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen S, Anderson B. Reliability of the modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index. Phys Ther 1988; 68:1077–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitz J, Gage A. Post stroke recovery of balanced sitting and ambulation ability. Aus J Phys 1995; 41:263–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dean C, Mackey F. Motor assessment scale scores as a measurement of rehabilitation outcome following stroke. Aus J Phys 1992; 38:31–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collen F, Wade D, Robb G, Bradshaw C. The Rivermead mobility index; a further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. Int Dis Stud 1991; 13:50–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lennon S, Johnson L. The modified Rivermead Mobility Index; validity and reliability. Dis Rehab 2000; 22:833–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackley C, Lincoln N. The verbal administration of the gross function section of the Rivermead motor assessment. Clin Rehabil 1990 4:301–3
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh C, Hsueh I, Mao H. Validity and responsiveness of the Rivermead Mobility Index in stroke patients. Scan J Rehabil Med 2000; 32:140–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams SA, Ashburn A, Pickering R, Taylor D. The scalability of the Rivermead motor assessment in acute stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1997a 11:42–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams SA, Pickering R, Ashburn A, Lincoln N. The scalability of the Rivermead motor assessment in non-acute stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1997b 11:52–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossier P, Wade DT. Validity and reliability of 4 mobility measures in- patients presenting with neurological impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82:9–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci S, Grasso M, Antonucci G, Bragoni M, Troisi E, Morelli D, et al. Mobility status after inpatient stroke rehabilitation; 1-year follow up and prognostic factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82:2–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge C, Edwards S. Recovery curves as a basis for evaluation. Phys 1988; 74:141–3
   Google Scholar
• Partridge C, Morris L, Edwards S. Recovery from physical disability after stroke; profiles for different levels of starting severity. Clin Rehabil 1993; 7:210–7
   Google Scholar
• Daley K, Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Reliability of scores on the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) measure. Phys Ther 1999; 79:8–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Tesio L, Ricupero C, Martino M. Trunk Control Test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome. Stroke 1997; 28:1382–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan P. The relationship between sitting balance and mobility outcome. Aus J Phys 1994; 40:91–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams J. The Balance Scale; Reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with acute stroke. Scan J Rehabil Med 1995; 27:27–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liston R & Brouwer B. Reliability and validity of measures obtained from stroke patients using the Balance Master. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77:425–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Maki B, Williams J, Holliday P, Wood-Dauphinee S. Clinical and Laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:1073–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorbahn L, Newton R. Use of the Berg Balance Scale to predict falls in the elderly. Phys Ther 1996; 76:576–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson T, Garland J. Standing balance during internally produced perturbations in subjects with hemiplegia: validation of the balance scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77:656–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams J, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument. Can J Pub Health 1992; 83(supp 2):S7–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wee J, Bagg S, Palepu A. The Berg Balance Scale as a predictor of length of stay and discharge destination in an acute stroke rehabilitation setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80:448–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niam S, Cheung W, Sullivan PE, Kent S, Gu X. Balance and physical impairment after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80:1227–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson T. Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale. Aus J Phys 2001; 47:29–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Dauphinee S, Berg K, Bravo G, Williams J. The Balance Scale: Responsiveness to clinically meaningful changes. Can J Rehabil 1996; 10:35–50
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon R, Leary K. Standing balance and function over the course of acute rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76:944–6
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger C. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). Scan J Rehabil Med 1994 26:115–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dodds T, Martin DP, Stolov W, Deyo RA. Validation of the Functional Independent Measure and its performance amongst rehabilitation in patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:531–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:133–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton B, Granger C. Disability outcomes following inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Phys Ther 1994; 74:494–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:127–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer MM, Feiwell E, Perry R, Perry J, Bonnett C. Functional Ambulation in patients with myelomeningocele. J Br Joint Surg 1973; 5:137–48
   Google Scholar
• McKensie C, Charlson M. Standards for use of ordinal scales in clinical trials. Br Med J 1986; 292:40–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar