A Systematic Review of Methods to Measure Posture

REFERENCES

• Lennon S, Baxter D, Ashburn A. Physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a survey within the UK. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23:254–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson S, Desouza L. A clinical model for the assessment of posture and balance post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 120–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronstein A, Brandt T, Woolacott M. Clinical Disorders of Balance, Posture and Gait. London: Arnold, 1996
   Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cooke A, Woolacott M. Motor Control Theory and Practical Application, 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Tyson S, DeSouza L. Measurement of balance post-stroke. Part 3. Instrumented measurement tools Phys Ther Rev 2003;7: In press
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwboer A, Feys H, De Weerdt W, Nuyens G, DeCorte E. Developing a clinical tool to measure sitting balance after stroke: a reliability study. Physiologist 1995; 81:439–45
   Google Scholar
• Horgan N, Finn A. Motor recovery following stroke: a basis for evaluation. Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19:64–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr E, Keeney F, Wilson-Barret J, Newham D. Inter-rater reliability of postural observation after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13:229–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett R, Brown K, Fall M. Reliability and validity of four instruments for measuring lumbar spine and pelvic positions. Phys Ther 1986; 66:677–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarello C, Savidge R. Inter-rater reliability of the Cybex EDI-320 and fluid goniometer in normals and patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:32–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitske J, Nattrass C, Disler P, Chou M, Ooi K. Reliability of the American Medical Association guides model of measuring spinal range of motion. Spine 1999; 24:262–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer T, Tencer A, Kristoferson S, Mooney V. Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range of motion in normal subjects and chronic low back pain patients. Spine 1984; 9:588–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saur P, Ensink F, Frese K, Seegar D, Hildebrandt J. Lumbar range of motion; reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine 1996; 21:1332–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds P. Measurement of spinal mobility: a reliability comparison of three methods Rheumatol Rehabil 1975;14:180–5
   Google Scholar
• Gill K, Krag M, Johnson G, Haugh L, Pope M. Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spine motion. Spine 1988; 13:51–3
   Google Scholar
• Nattrass C, Nitske J, Disler P, Chou M, Ooi K. Lumbar spine range of motion as a measure of physical and functional; impairment; an investigation of validity Clin Rehabil 1999;13:211–8
   Google Scholar
• Keeley J, Mayer T, Cox R, Gatchel R, Smith J, Mooney V. Quantification of lumbar function. Part 5. Reliability of range of motion measures in the sagittal plane and an in vivo torso rotation measurement technique. Spine 1986; 11:31–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondinelli R, Murphy J, Esler A, Marciano T, Cholmakjian C. Estimation of normal lumbar flexion with surface inclinometry; a comparison of three methods. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 71:219–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer S. Chen I, Lavender S, Trafimow J, Andersson N. Variance in the measurement of sagittal lumbar spine range of motion among examiners, subjects and instruments. Spine 1995; 13: 1489–93
   Google Scholar
• Mayer T, Kondraske G, Beals S, Gatchel R. Spinal range of motion; accuracy and sources of error with inclinometric measurement. Spine 1997; 122:1976–84
   Google Scholar
• Mellin G. Measurement of thoraco-lumbar posture and mobility using a Myrin inclinometer. Spine 1986; 11:759–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellin G, Kiisi R, Weckstrom A. Effects of subject position on measurements of flexion, extension and lateral flexion of the spine. Spine 1991; 16:1108–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton J, Waddell G. Reliability and validity of clinical measurement of the lumbar spine in patients with chronic low back pain. Physiologist 1991; 12:769–800
   Google Scholar
• Tucci S, Hicks J, Gross E, Campbell W, Danoff J. Cervical motion assessment: a new simple and accurate method. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67:225–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaber-Moffat J, Hughes I, Griffiths P. Measurement of cervical spine movements using a simple inclinometer. Physiologist 1989; 75:309–12
   Google Scholar
• Youdas J, Carey J, Garrett T. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion - comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 1991; 71:98–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love S, Gringmuth R, Kazemi M, Cornacchia P, Schmolke M. Inter-examiner and intra-examiner reliability of cervical passive range of motion using CROM and Cybex 320 EDI. J Can Chiropractic Assoc 1998; 42:222–8
   Google Scholar
• Taylor B, Ellis E, Haran D. The reliability of measurement of postural alignment to assess muscle tone change. Physiologist 1995; 81:485–90
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald G, Wynveen K, Rheault W, Rothschild B. Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spine range of motion. Phys Ther 1983; 63:1776–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll J, Liyange S, Wright V. An objective clinical method to measure lateral spinal flexion. Rheumatol Phys Med 1972; 11:225–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moll J, Liyange S, Wright V. An objective clinical method to measure spinal extension. Rheumatol Phys Med 1972;11:293–312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frost M, Stuckley D, Smalley A, Dorman G. Reliability of measuring trunk motions in centimetres Phys Ther 1962;10: 1431–7
   Google Scholar
• Gajdosik R, Simpson R, Smith R, Dontigny R. Pelvic tilt; intra-tester reliability of measuring the standing position and range of motion. Phys Ther 1985; 65:169–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer K. The relationship between cervical resting posture and neck pain. Physiologist 1996; 82:45–51
   Google Scholar
• Walker M, Rothstein J, Finucane S, Lamb R. Relationships between lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt and abdominal performance. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 512–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdas J, Susman V, Garrett T. Reliability of measurements of the lumbar spine sagittal mobility obtained with the flexible curve. J Orthop Sports Ther 1995; 21:13–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdas J, Garrett T, Harmsen S, Susman V, Carey J. Lumbar lordosis and pelvic inclination of symptomatic adults. Phys Ther 1996; 76:1066–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton A. Regional lumbar sagittal mobility; measurement by flexi-curves. Clin Biomech 1986; 1: 20–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart D, Rose S. Reliability of non-invasive method of measuring lumbar curve. J Orthop Sports Ther 1986; 8: 180–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross M, Burns C, Chapman S, et al. Reliability and validity of rigid lift and pelvic levelling device method in assessing functional leg length discrepancy. J Orthop Sports Ther 1998;27:285–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue M, Riddle D, Sullivan M. Inter-tester reliability of a modified version of McKensie’s lateral shift assessments obtained on patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 1996; 76:706–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean I, Gillan M, Ross J, Aspden R, Porter R. A comparison of methods for measuring trunk list. A simple plumb line is the best. Spine 1996; 21:1667–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar