Constraint-induced Therapy and the Motor Learning Literature That Underpins Its Application

REFERENCES

• Van Der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of upper extremity in chronic stroke patients. Stroke 1999; 30:2369–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland A, Tinson DJ, Bradley EL, Fletcher D, Langton-Hewer R, Wade DT. Enhanced physical therapy improvesrecovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55:530–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland A, Fletcher D, Bradley L, Tinson D, Langton-Hewer R, Wade DT. Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke: a one year follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57:856–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Hewer RL, Ward E. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50:714–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation- a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999; 36:25–32
   Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto S, Johnston MV, Levine P. Modified constraint- induced therapy after sub-acute stroke: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16:290–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. Exerc Sports Sci Rev 1977; 4:335–74
   Google Scholar
• Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke. Stroke 1999; 30:586–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganisation after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000; 31:1210–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, Keller P, Chakeres DW. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganisation in upper limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80:4–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischaemic stroke? Stroke 2000; 31:2984–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabari JS, Kane L, Flanagan SR, Steinberg A. Constraint- induced motor relearning after stroke: a naturalistic case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82:524–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski DA, James DC, Schallert T. Use-dependent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions. J Neurosci 1976; 16:4776–86
   Google Scholar
• Humm JL, Kozlowski DA, James DC, Gotts JE, Schallert T. Use-dependent exacerbation of brain damage occurs during an early post-lesion vulnerable period. Brain Res 1998; 783:286–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JWR, Lankhorst GL, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primarymiddle cerebral artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354:191–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker CL, Van Staalduinen AM, Beckerman H, Van Der Lee JH, Koppe PA, Zondervan RCJ. Concurrent validity of instruments to measure upper extremity performance: the Action Research Arm Test, the Nine Hole Peg Test and the Motricity Index. Ned Tijdschr Fysio ther 2001; 111:110–5
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72:473–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeroy VM, Tallis RC. Restoring movement and functional ability after stroke. Physiotherapy 2002; 88:3–17
   Google Scholar
• Sterr A, Freivogel S, Voss A. Exploring a repetitive training regime for upper limb hemiparesis in an in-patient setting: a report on three case studies. Brain Inj 2002; 16: 1093–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, Kolbel S, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83:1374–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen HS, Kammersgaard LP, Houth J, et al. Who benefits from treatment and rehabilitation in a stroke unit? A community-based study. Stroke 2000; 31:434–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. A patient centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12:338–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombly CA, Wu C. Effect of rehabilitation tasks on organisation of movement after stroke. Am J Occup Ther 1999; 53:333–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talvitie U, Reunanen M. Interaction between physiotherapists and patients in stroke treatment. Physiotherapy 2002; 88:77–88
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning: a behavioural emphasis, 3rd edn. Leeds: Human Kinetics, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Metalis SA. Effects of massed versus distributed practice on acquisition of video game skill. Percept Motor Skills 1985; 61:457–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert IB, Simmons J, Walker J. Massed and spaced practice in alpha enhancement. Percept Motor Skills 1974; 39:1039–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasey WC. Distribution of practice effects on learning retention and relearning by retarded boys. Percep t Motor Skills 1976; 43:159–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouzid N, Crawshaw CM. Massed versus distributed word processor training. Appl Ergon 1987; 18:220–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley JD. Effects of practice distribution on learning a fine motor task. Res Quart 1970; 41:576–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinman M. The effects of practice distribution on the acquisition of three discrete motor skills. Res Quart 1976;47:672–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinman M. Distribution of practice and pre-task ability in the acquisition of three discrete gross motor skills. Percept Motor Skills 1980; 51:935–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rider RA, Abdulahad DT. The effects of massed versus distributed practice on gross and fine motor proficiency of educable mentally handicapped adolescents. Percept Motor Skills 1991; 73:219–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer RN. Massed and distributed practice effects on the acquisition and retention of a novel basketball skill. Res Quart 1965; 36:68–77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham P. Distribution of practice as a factor affecting learning and/or performance. J Motor Behav 1976; 8:305–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee TD, Genovese ED. Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: Different effects for discrete and continuous tasks. Res Q Exerc Sport 1989; 60:59–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stammers R, Patrick J. The Psychology of Training. London: Methuen, 1975
   Google Scholar
• Neistadt ME. The effects of different treatment activities on functional fine motor co-ordination in adults with brain injury. Am J Occup Ther 1994; 48:877–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford MD, Costanza DP, Baughman WA, Threlfall KV, Fleishman EA. Influence of abilities on performance during practice: effects of massed and distributed practice. J Educ Psychol 1994; 86:134–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer RN, Cauraugh JH, Lucariello G, Brown HJ. Achievement in related psychomotor tasks as influenced by learning strategies. Percept Motor Skills 1985; 60:838–46
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood DE. The benefits of random variable practice for spatial accuracy and error detection in a rapid aiming task. Res Q Exerc Sport, 1996; 67:35–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KA, Magill RA. Variability of practice and contextual interference in motor skill learning. J Motor Behav 1995; 27:299–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsutsui S, Lee TD, Hodges NJ. Contextual interference in learning new patterns of bimanual co-ordination. J Motor Behav 1998; 30:151–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea CH, Kohl R, Indermill C. Contextual Interference: Contributions of practice. Acta Psychol 1990; 73:145–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert JM, Thon B. Differential effects of task complexity on contextual interference in a drawing task. Acta Psychol 1998; 1:9–24
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wright DL. An assessment of the attention demands during random and blocked practice schedules. Q J Exp Psychol 2000; 53A:591–606
   Google Scholar
• Dick MB, Hsieh S, Dick-Muehlke C, Davis DS, Cotman CW. The variability of practice hypothesis in motor learning: does it apply to Alzheimer’s disease? Brain Cogn 2000; 44:470–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JM, Elliott D, Lee TD. Contextual interference effects during skill acquisition and transfer in Down’s syndrome adolescents Adapt Phys Activity Q 1986;3:250–8
   Google Scholar
• Pohl PS, McDowd JM, Filion DL, Richards LG, Stiers W. Implicit learning of a perceptual motor skill after stroke. Phys Ther 2001; 8:1780–9
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon RE. Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77:811–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar