Reliability Research: Towards a More Clinically Relevant Approach

REFERENCES

• Rothstein JM. Sick and tired of reliability? Phys Ther 2001; 81:774–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Langeveld SHB, Aufdemkampe G, Van Asbeck FWA. Reliability of force measurement with a hand-held dynamometer in healthy subjects and force measurement in patients with poliomyelitis anterior acuta. J Rehabil Sci 1996; 9:2–10
   Google Scholar
• Nijeboer JH, Boogaert JAI, Houvast MH, Aufdemkampe G. Betrouwbaarheidsonderzoek van de MicroFet bij gezonde personen, polymyositis- en Guillain-Barré-patiënten. In: Aufdemkampe G, Den Dekker JB, Van Ham I, Van Meerwijk GM, Vaes P. (eds) Jaarboek Fysiotherapie/Kinesitherapie 1994. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, 1994; 169–94
   Google Scholar
• Stratford PW, Balsor BE. A comparison of make and break tests using a hand-held dynamometer and the Kin-Com. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994; 19:28–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86:420–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowie P, Branton T, Holmes J. Should the Mini Mental State Examination be used to monitor dementia treatments? Lancet 1999; 354:1527–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura IF, Jefferson LM, Gulick DT, Coll RD. Intra- and intertester reliability of Chatillon and MicroFet hand-held dynamometers in measuring force production. J Sport Rehabil 1996; 5:197–205
   Google Scholar
• Wadsworth CT, Nielsen DH, Corcoran DS, et al. Interrater reliability of hand-held dynamometry: effects of rater gender, body weight, and grip strength. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992; 16:74–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croxford P, Jones K, Barker KL. Intertester comparison between visual estimation and goniometric measurement of ankle dorsiflexion. Phys Ther 1998; 14:107–13
   Google Scholar
• Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion - comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 1991; 71:98–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilmer DD, McCrory MA, Wright NC, et al. Hand-held dynamometry reliability in persons with neuropathic weakness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78:1364–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong AD, MacDermid JC, Chinchalkar S, et al. Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998; 7:573–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rome K, Cowieson F. A reliability study of the universal goniometer, fluid goniometer, and electrogoniometer for the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion. Foot Ankle Int 1996; 17:28–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosseau L, Balmer S, Tousignant M, et al. Intra- and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for measuring maximum active knee flexion and extension of patients with knee restrictions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001;82:396–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabari JS, Maltzev I, Lubarsky D, et al. Goniometric assessment of shoulder range of motion: comparison of testing in supine and sitting positions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79:647–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan K. Assessment of published reliability studies for cervical spine range-of-motion measurement tools. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000; 23:180–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNair PJ, Depledge J, Brettkelly M, Stanley SN. Verbal encouragement: effects on maximum effort voluntary muscle action. Br J Sports Med 1996; 30:243–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaegi C, Thibault M, Giroux F, Bourbonnais D. The interrater reliability of force measurements using a modified sphygmomanometer in elderly subjects. Phys Ther 1998; 78:1095–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland MJ, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i:307–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controlled Clin Trials 1991; 12:142S-58S
   Google Scholar
• Nitschke JE, McMeeken JM, Burry HC, Matyas TA. When is a change a genuine change? A clinically meaningful interpretation of grip strength measurements in healthy and disabled women. J Hand Ther 1999; 12:25–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nollet F, Beelen A. Strength assessment in postpolio syndrome: validity of a hand-held dynamometer in detecting change? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80:1316–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munneke M, Bekkering WP, Lamers FW. Betrouwbaarheid van het meten van spierkracht met de MicroFET2 bij gezonde, zesjarige kinderen. Ned TFysiother 1998; 108:88–94
   Google Scholar
• Schreuders TA, Roebroeck M, van der Kar TJ, et al. Strength of the intrinsic muscles of the hand measured with a hand-held dynamometer: reliability in patients with ulnar and median nerve paralysis. J Hand Surg Br 2000; 25:560–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eliasziw M, Young SL, Woodbury MG, Fryday-Field K. Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther 1994; 74:777–788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertzen JH, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, et al. Variation in measurements of range of motion: a study in reflex sympathetic dystrophy patients Clin Rehabil 1998;12:254–64
   Google Scholar
• Richardson J, Stratford P, Cripps D. Assessment of reliability of the hand-held dynamometer for measuring strength in healthy older adults Physiother Theory Pract 1998;14:49–54
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials Ann Intern Med 2001;134:657–62
   Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134:663–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karner PM, Thompson AL, Connelly DM, Vandervoort AA. Strength testing in elderly women using a portable dynamometer. Physiother Can 1998; 50:35–9
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW. Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78:26–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwoh CK, Petrick MA, Munin MC. Inter-rater reliability for function and strength measurements in the acute care hospital after elective hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res 1997; 10:128–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May LA, Burnham RS, Steadward RD. Assessment of isokinetic and hand-held dynamometer measures of shoulder rotator strength among individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78:251–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland J, Finch E, Stratford PW, et al. Interrater reliability of six tests of trunk muscle function and endurance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1997; 26:200–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinking MF, Bockrath-Pugliese K, Worrell T, et al. Assessment of quadriceps muscle performance by hand-held, isometric, and isokinetic dynamometry in patients with knee dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996; 24:154–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Smith J, Hull D, et al. Deficits in lower extremity muscle and gait performance among renal transplant candidates. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76:547–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll T, Bruhlmann P, Stucki G, et al. Muscle strength assessment in polymyositis and dermatomyositis evaluation of the reliability and clinical use of a new, quantitative, easily applicable method. J Rheumatol 1995; 22:473–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deones VL, Wiley SC, Worrell T. Assessment of quadriceps muscle performance by a hand-held dynamometer and an isokinetic dynamometer. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994; 20:296–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvat M, Croce R, Roswal G. Intratester reliability of the Nicholas manual muscle tester on individuals with intellectual disabilities by a tester having minimal experience. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:808–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvat M, Croce R, Roswal G. Magnitude and reliability of measurements of muscle strength across trials for individuals with mental retardation. Percept Mot Skills 1993; 77:643–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson C, Croce R, Quinn T, Vroman N. Reliability of the Nicholas manual muscle tester on upper body strength in children ages 8–10. Pediatr Exer Sci 1992; 4:340–50
   Google Scholar
• Hayes KW, Falconer J. Reliability of hand-held dynamometry and its relationship with manual muscle testing in patients with osteoarthritis in the knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992; 16:145–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livesley E. The intra-observer reliability of the hand-held myometer in the measurement of isotonic muscle strength in chronic spasticity. Physiotherapy 1992; 78:918–21
   Google Scholar
• McMahon LR, Burdett RG, Whitney SL. Effects of muscle group and placement site on reliability of hand-held dynamometry strength measurements. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992; 15:236–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Surburg PR, Suomi R, Poppy WK. Validity and reliability of a hand-held dynamometer with two populations. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992; 16:229–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surburg PR, Suomi R, Poppy WK. Validity and reliability of a hand-held dynamometer applied to adults with mental retardation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73:535–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Lusardi MM. Modified sphygmomanometer versus strain gauge hand-held dynamometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72:911–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer JF, Vaz MD, Vandervoort AA. Reliability of isometric hip abductor torques during examiner- and belt-resisted tests. J Gerontol 1991;46: M47–51
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg RJO, Fidler V, Oosterhuis HJGH. Hand-held myometry: reference values J Neurol 1991;54:244–7
   Google Scholar
• Wikholm JB, Bohannon RW. Hand-held dynamometer measurements: tester strength makes a difference. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1991; 13:191–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsieh CY, Phillips RB. Reliability of manual muscle testing with a computerized dynamometer. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1990; 13:72–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendell JR, Florence J. Manual muscle testing. Muscle Nerve 1990; 13:S16–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheault W, Beal JL, Kubik KR, et al. Intertester reliability of the hand-held dynamometer for wrist flexion and extension. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70:907–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddle DL, Finucane SD, Rothstein JM, Walker ML. Intrasession and intersession reliability of hand-held dynamometer measurements taken on brain-damaged patients. Phys Ther 1989; 69:182–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byl NN, Richards S, Asturias J. Intrarater and interrater reliability of strength measurements of the biceps and deltoid using a hand held dynamometer J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1988;9:399–405
   Google Scholar
• Stuberg WA, Metcalf WK. Reliability of quantitative muscle testing in healthy children and in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy using a hand-held dynamometer. Phys Ther 1988; 68:977–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan SJ, Chesley A, Hebert G, et al. The validity and reliability of hand-held dynamometry in assessing isometric external rotator performance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1988; 10:213–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agre JC, Magness JL, Hull SZ, et al. Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:454–8
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Andrews AW. Interrater reliability of hand-held dynamometry. Phys Ther 1987; 67:931–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett RG, Whitney SL. Reliability of hand-held dynamometry in measuring muscle strength. Phys Ther 1987; 67:748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadsworth CT, Krishnan R, Sear M, et al. Intrarater reliability of manual muscle testing and hand-held dynamometry muscle testing. Phys Ther 1987; 67:1342–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW. Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment. Phys Ther 1986; 66:206–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellecchia GL, Bohannon RW. Active lateral neck flexion range of motion measurements obtained with a modified goniometer: reliability and estimates of normal. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998; 21:443–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Suman VJ, et al. Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: An initial goniometric study. Phys Ther 1992; 72:770–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solveborn SA, Olerud C. Radial epicondylalgia (tennis elbow): measurement of range of motion of the wrist and the elbow. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996; 23:251–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra PU, de Bont LG, van der Weele LT, Boering G. Joint mobility measurements: reliability of a standardized method. Cranio 1994; 12:52–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogeweg JA, Langereis MJ, Bernards ATM, et al. Goniometry -variability in the clinical practice of a conventional goniometer in healthy subjects Europ J Phys Med Res 1994;4:2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Youdas JW, Bogard CL, Suman VJ. Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of ankle joint active range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:1113–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin J, Clark C, Deakes J, et al. Clinical methods of goniometry: a comparative study. Disabil Rehabil 1992; 14:10–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clapper MP, Wolf SL. Comparison of the reliability of the orthoranger and the standard goniometer for assessing active lower extremity range of motion. Phys Ther 1988; 68:214–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petherick M, Rheault W, Kimble S, et al. Concurrent validity and intertester reliability of universal and fluid-based goniometers for active elbow range of motion. Phys Ther 1988; 68:966–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheault W, Miller M, Nothnagel P, et al. Intertester reliability and concurrent validity of fluid-based and universal goniometers for active knee flexion. Phys Ther 1988; 68:1676–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinabarger NI. Limited joint mobility in adults with diabetes mellitus Phys Ther 1987;67:215–8
   Google Scholar
• Boone DC, Azen SP, Lin CM, et al. Reliability of goniometric measurements Phys Ther 1978;58:1355–90
   Google Scholar