Postoperative exercise programmes for lumbar spine decompression surgery: a systematic review of the evidence

REFERENCE

• Barrios C, Ahmed M, Arotegui JI, Bjornsson A. Clinical factors predicting outcome after surgery for herniated lumbar disc: an epidemiological multivariate analysis. J Spinal Disord 1990;3:205–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korres DS, Loupassis G, Stamos K. Results of lumbar discectomy: a study using 15 different evaluation methods. Eur Spine J 1992;1:20–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manniche C, Asmussen KH, Vinterberg H, Rose-Hansen EB, Kramhoft J, Jordan A. Analysis of preoperative prognostic factors in first-time surgery for lumbar disc herniation, including Ginneson’s and modified Spengler’s score systems. Dan Med Bull 1994;41:110–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manniche C, Asmussen KH, Vinterberg H, Rose-Hansen EB, Kramhoft J, Jordan A. Back pain, sciatica and disability following first-time conventional hemilaminectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Use of ‘Low back pain rating scale’ as a postal questionnaire. Dan Med Bull 1994;41:103–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smulders WLM, van Loon G. Treatment after lumbar discectomy or chemonucleolysis: an outpatient survey. Fysiopraxis 1993;4–6
   Google Scholar
• Ostelo RWJG, de Vet HCW, Waddell G, Kerckhoffs MR, Leffers P, van Tulder MW Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000; Issue 4: Article no. CD003007. D0I:10.1002/14651858
   Google Scholar
• Dvorak J, Valach L, Fuhrimann P, Heim E. The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. II. A 4—17 year follow-up with emphasis on psychosocial aspects. Spine 1988;13:1423–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurme M, Alaranta H. Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 1987;12:933–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas CTE, Harrington T, Sonntag VKH. Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery 1992;30:862–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangfort EV. The lumbar disc herniation. A computer-aided analysis of 2,504 operations. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1972;95:1421–95
   Google Scholar
• Weber H. Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 1983;8:131–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer TG, Mooney V, Gatchel RJ, Barnes D, Terry A, Smith S, et al. Quantifying post-operative deficits of physical function following spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 1989;244:147–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCulloch J. Microdiscectomy. In: Frymoyer JW. (ed) The Adult Spine. New York. Raven, 1991;1765–84
   Google Scholar
• Goel VK, Goyal S, Clark C, Nishiyama K, Nye T. Kinematics of the whole lumbar spine: effect of discectomy. Spine 1985;10: 543–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber B, Grob D, Dvorak J, Muntener M. Posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine and its effect on the multifidus muscle. Spine 1997;22:1765–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, Ishihara H, Tsuji H. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1999;24:1023–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 1993;18:575–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantanen J, Hurme M, Falck B, Alaranta H, Nykvist F, Lehto M, et al. The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 1993;18:568–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellby-Wendt G, Styf J. Early active training after lumbar discectomy. A prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Spine 1998;23:2345–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellby-Wendt G, Carlsson SG, Styf J. Results of early active rehabilitation 5–7 years after surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord 2002;15:404–921 Hansen JW. Postoperative management in lumbar disc protrusions II: follow-up on a trained and an untrained group of patients. Acta Orthop ScandSuppl 1964;71:32–46
   Google Scholar
• Jette DU, Jette AM. Professional uncertainty and treatment choices by physical therapists. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:1346–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 1999;354:1896–990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter LM. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine 2003;28:1290–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tulder M, Assendelft WJJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group for spinal disorders. Spine 1997;22:2323–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. The basics of evidence based medicine. London: BMJ Publishing, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Busch AJ, Schachter CL, Peloso PM. Fibromyalgia and exercise training: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Phys Ther Rev 2001;6:287–306
   Google Scholar
• Liddle SD, Baxter GD, Gracey JH. Exercise and chronic low back pain: what works? Pain 2004;107:176–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil TM, Asfour SS, Martinez LM, Waly SM, Rosomoff RS, Rosomoff HL. Stretching in the rehabilitation of low-back pain patients. Spine 1992;17:311–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning and Disability (ICIDH). Geneva: WHO, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Bombardier C. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders. Spine 2000;25:3100–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJHM, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research: a proposal for standardised use. Spine 1998;23:2003–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaranta H, Hurme M, Einola S, Veikko K, Knuts LR, Torma T. Rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: results of a randomized clinical trial. Int J Rehabil Res 1986;9:247–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan GP, Shultz B, Hood RS, Zahniser JC, Johnson SC, Gerber AH. The effects of aerobic exercise after lumbar microdiscectomy. Spine 1994;19:735–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke SA, Harms-Constas CK, Aden PS. Return to work/work retention outcomes of a functional restoration program. A multicenter, prospective study with a comparison group. Spine 1994;19:1880–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson JM, Johnsen R, Kibsgaard SK, Hellevik E. Early aggressive exercise for post-operative rehabilitation after discectomy. Spine 2000;25:1015–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan P, Greenfield K, Nelson RJ, Nelson IW. Can exercise therapy improve the outcome of microdiscectomy? Spine 2000;25:1523–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donceel P, Du Bois M, Lahaye D. Return to work after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. A rehabilitation-orientated approach in insurance medicine. Spine 1999;24:872–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannsen F, Remvig L, Kryger P, Beck P, Lybeck K, Larsen LH, et al. Supervised endurance exercise training compared to home training after first lumbar discectomy: a clinical trial. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1994;12:609–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitteringham C. The effect of straight leg raise exercises after lumbar decompression surgery - a pilot study. Physiotherapy 1996;82:115–23
   Google Scholar
• Manniche C, Skall HF, Braendholt L, Christensen BH, Christopherson L, Ellegaard B, et al. Clinical trial of postoperative dynamic back exercises after first lumbar discectomy. Spine 1993;18:92–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, Vinterberg H, Karbo H, Abildstrup M, et al. Intensive dynamic back exercises with or without hyperextension in chronic back pain after surgery for lumbar disc protrusion. A clinical trial. Spine 1993;18:560–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timm KE. A randomized-control study of active and passive treatments for chronic low back pain following L5 laminectomy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994;20:276–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filiz M, Cakmak A, Ozcan E. The effectiveness of exercise programmes after lumbar disc surgery: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:4–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostelo RWJG, de Vet HC, Berfelo MW, Kerckhoffs MR, Vlaeyen JWS, Wolters PMJC, et al. Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity after first-time lumbar disc surgery: short terms results of a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J2003;12:637–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostelo RWJG, de Vet HCW, Vlaeyen JWS, Kerckhoffs MR, Berfelo WM, Wolters PMJC, et al. Behavioural graded activity following first-time lumbar disc surgery. One-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2003;28:1757–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostelo RWJG, Goossens MEJB, de Vet HCW, van den Brandt PA. Economic evaluation of a behavioural-graded activity program compared to physical therapy for patients following lumbar disc surgery. Spine 2004;29:615–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen FB, Laurberg I, Bunger CE. Importance of the back café concept to rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomised clinical study with a two year follow-up. Spine 2003;28:2561–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrimshaw S, Maher CG. Randomized controlled trial of neural mobilisation after spinal surgery. Spine 2001;26:2647–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carragee EJ, Helms E, O’Sullivan GS. Are postoperative activity restrictions necessary after posterior lumbar discectomy? Spine 1996;21:1893–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM). ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 6th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Bentsen H, Lindgarde F, Manthorpe R. The effect of dynamic strength back exercise and/or a home training programme in 57 year-old women with chronic low back pain: results of a prospective randomised study with a 3-year follow-up. Spine 1997;22:1494–500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COST Action B13 Management Committee. European guidelines for the management of LBP. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 2002;73:20–5
   Google Scholar
• van Tulder MW, Ostelo RWJG, Vlaeyen JWS, Linton SJ, Morley SJ, Assendelft WJJ. Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 2000 Article no: CD002014. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
   Google Scholar
• Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP). Outcome Measures CLEF03. London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Tosteson TD. Point of view. Spine 1999;24:2562–3
   Google Scholar