Feasibility of further motor recovery in patients undergoing physiotherapy more than 6 months after severe traumatic brain injury: an updated literature review

REFERENCES

• Department of Health. The National Service Framework for Long-Term Conditions. London: Department of Health, 2005
   Google Scholar
• The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Effectiveness Bulletin. Evidence Based Practice: Neurology. London: The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Watson MJ. Do patients with severe traumatic brain injury benefit from physiotherapy? A review of the evidence. Phys Ther Rev 2001;6:233–49
   Google Scholar
• Watson MJ. Evidence for ‘significant’ late-stage motor recovery in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a literature review with relevance for neurological physiotherapy. Phys Ther Rev 1997;2:93–106
   Google Scholar
• McMorris T. Learning. Acquisition and performance of sports skills. Chichester: Wiley, 2004; 163–202
   Google Scholar
• Punt TD. No success like failure: walking late after stroke. Physiotherapy 2000;86:563–6
   Google Scholar
• Turton AJ, Fraser CM. A test battery to measure the recovery of voluntary movement control following stroke. Br J Occup Ther 1988;51:11–4
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Wood VA, Heller A, Maggs J, Langton HR. Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. Scand J Rehabil Med 1987;19:25–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stichbury JC. Assessment of disability following severe head injury. Physiotherapy 1975;61:268–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panikoff LB. Recovery trends of functional skills in the head- injured adult. Am J Occup Ther 1983;37:735–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin N, Sunderland A. Intensive, time-series measurement of upper limb recovery in the subacute phase following stroke. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:69–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najenson T, Sazbon L, Fiselzon J, Becker E, Schechter I. Recovery of communicative functions after prolonged traumatic coma. Scand J Rehabil Med 1978;10:15–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LaTorre DR, Kennelly JW, Fetta IB, Harris CR, Carpenter LL. Calculus Concepts: an informal approach to the mathematics of change. Lexington: D C Heath, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita P. Late postacute neurologic rehabilitation: neuroscience, engineering, and clinical programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1100–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Gater DR, Bach YR. Reconsidering the motor recovery plateau in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1377–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshblum S, Millis S, McKinley W, Tulsky D. Late neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1811–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiden JS, Small R, Caton W, Weiss M, Kurze T. Severe head injury. Clinical assessment and outcome. Phys Ther 1983;63:1946–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond MR. Assessment of the psychosocial outcome after severe head injury. Ciba Found Symp 1975;34:141–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks N, Campsie L, Symington C, Beattie A, McKinley W. The effects of severe head injury on patient and relative within seven years of injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1987;2:1–13
   Google Scholar
• Schalen W, Sonesson B, Messeter K, Nordstrom G, Nordstrom CH. Clinical outcome and cognitive impairment in patients with severe head injuries treated with barbiturate coma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1992;117:153–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett B, Teasdale G, Galbraith S, Pickard J, Grant H, Braakman R, et al. Severe head injuries in three countries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1977;40:291–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SC, Barnes TY, Bullock R, Germanson TA, Marmarou A, Young HF. Temporal profile of outcomes in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1994;81:169–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engberg A. Severe traumatic brain injury - epidemiology, external causes, prevention, and rehabilitation of mental andphysical sequelae. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 1995;164:1–151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strens LH, Mazibrada G, Duncan JS, Greenwood R. Misdiagnosing the vegetative state after severe brain injury: the influence of medication. Brain Inj 2004;18:213–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dombovy ML, Olek AC. Recovery and rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 1997;11:305–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KM, Bushnik T, Lakisic-Kazazic B, Wright J, Cantagallo A. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:367–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope DN, Hall K. Head injury rehabilitation: benefit of early intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:433–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford JL, Olver JH, Curran C. A profile of outcome: 2 years after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 1995;9:1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert-Gruner M, Wedekind C, Klug N. Outcome of prolonged coma following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2003;17:49–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlock Jr JA. Functional outcome of low-level traumatically brain-injured admitted to an acute rehabilitation programme. Brain Inj 1992;6:447–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lipper-Gruner M, Wedekind C, Klug N. Functional and psychosocial outcome one year after severe traumatic brain injury and early-onset rehabilitation therapy. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:211–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annoni JM, Beer S, Kesselring J. Severe traumatic brain injury - epidemiology and outcome after 3 years. Disabil Rehabil 1992;14:23–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medical Disability Society. The Management of Traumatic Brain Injury: a working party report of the Medical Disability Society. London: The Medical Disability Society (Royal College of Physicians), 1988
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a working party report of the British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. London: BSRM, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood R. Head injury for neurologists. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73 (Suppl 1):i 8–16
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Schenkman M, Butler RB. A model for multisystem evaluation, interpretation, and treatment of individuals with neurologic dysfunction. Phys Ther 1989;69:538–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Describing rehabilitation interventions. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:811–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack A, Horn LJ. Functional prognosis in traumatic brain injury. Phys Med Rehabil 1989;3:13–26
   Google Scholar
• Jackson H. Psychological aspects of physical rehabilitation after severe head injury: a case study. Physiother Practice 1986;2:47–51
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD, O’Brien KP. Longitudinal study of emotional, social, and physical changes after traumatic brain injury. J Learn Disabil 1988;21:456–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman N, Shepherd J, Youngson H. Increasing the standing tolerance and posture quality following severe brain injury using a behaviour modification approach. Physiotherapy 1992;78:335–43
   Google Scholar
• Horn S, Watson M, Wilson BA, McLellan DL. The development of new techniques in the assessment and monitoring of recovery from severe head injury: a preliminary report and case history. Brain Inj 1992;6:321–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sbordone RJ, Liter JC, Pettler-Jennings P. Recovery of function following severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective 10-year follow-up. Brain Inj 1995;9:285–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington A, Williams C, Young K, Pownall J. Re-training gait components for walking in the context of abulia. Physiother Theory Practice 1997;13:247–56
   Google Scholar
• Butler PB, Farmer SE, Major RE. Improvement in gait parameters following late intervention in traumatic brain injury: a long-term follow-up report of a single case. Clin Rehabil 1997;11:220–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiller AD, Burke DT, Kim HJ, Calvanio R, Dechman KG, Santini C. Treatment with amantadine potentiated motor learning in a patient with traumatic brain injury of 15 years’ duration. Brain Inj 1999;13:715–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade R. Complex disability: a case study. Synapse 2000; Autumn :35–7
   Google Scholar
• Burke D, Alexander K, Baxter M, Baker F, Connell K, Diggles S, et al. Rehabilitation of a person with severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2000;14:463–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wales LR, Bernhardt JA. A case for slow to recover rehabilitation services following severe acquired brain injury. Aust J Physiother 2000;46:143–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keren O, Reznik J, Groswasser Z. Combined motor disturbances following severe traumatic brain injury: an integrative long-term treatment approach. Brain Inj 2001;15:633–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson MJ, Bailey B, Trebble H. Later stage recovery following severe brain injury - identifying the evidence. Synapse 2003; Autumn/Winter:5–9
   Google Scholar
• Watson MJ, Hitchcock R. Recovery of walking late after a severe traumatic brain injury. Physiotherapy 2004;90:103–7
   Google Scholar
• McMillan TM, Herbert CM. Further recovery in a potential treatment withdrawal case 10 years after brain injury. Brain Inj 2004;18:935–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanhehco J, Kaplan PE. Physical and surgical rehabilitation of patient after 6-year coma. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:36–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray DS. Slow-to-recover severe traumatic brain injury: a review of outcomes and rehabilitation effectiveness. Brain Inj 2000;14:1003–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Bland JM. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ 1995;311:485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White J. Case reports: what more can we do? Physiother Theory Practice 2004;20:77–8
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein JM. Case reports: still a priority. Phys Ther 2002;82:1062–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge CJ. Case reports in physiotherapy. Physiother Res Int 2000;5:iv-iv
   Google Scholar
• Partridge C. Writing case reports and short reports. Physiother Res Int 2003;8:iii-iiv
   Google Scholar
• Lord S. The case for n = 1. NZ J Physiother 2005;33:1
   Google Scholar
• Partridge CJ. Describing patterns of recovery as a basis for evaluating progress. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1992;8:55–61
   Google Scholar
• Partridge CJ, Morris LW, Edwards SM. Recovery from physical disability after stroke: profiles for different levels of starting severity. Clin Rehabil 1993;7:210–7
   Google Scholar
• Maher CG, Sherrington C, Elkins M, Herbert RD, Moseley AM. Challenges for evidence-based physical therapy: accessing and interpreting high-quality evidence on therapy. Phys Ther 2004;84:644–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson MJ, Horn SA, Wilson BA. Assessing a minimally responsive brain injured person. Br J Ther Rehabil 1999;6:436–41
   Google Scholar
• Freeman EA. The persistent vegetative state: a ‘fate worse than death’. Clin Rehabil 1992;6:159–65
   Google Scholar
• Childs NL, Mercer WN, Childs HW. Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Neurology 1993;43:1465–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews K, Murphy L, Munday R, Littlewood C. Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. BMJ 1996;313:13–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson JTE. Outcome, recovery and rehabilitation. Clinical and neuropsychological aspects of closed head injury. London: Taylor and Francis, 1990; 219–82
   Google Scholar
• Partridge C, Edwards S. Recovery curves as a basis for evaluation. Physiotherapy 1988;74:141–6
   Google Scholar
• Antonucci G, Aprile T, Paolucci S. Rasch analysis of the Rivermead Mobility Index: a study using mobility measures of first-stroke inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1442–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson HG, Kohler F. The multi-dimensionality of the FIM motor items precludes an interval scaling using Rasch analysis. Scand J Rehabil Med 1996;28:159–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waldrop MM. Complexity: the emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. London:Penguin Books, 1993
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman SA. At home in the universe: the search for laws of complexity. London: Viking, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Lampl M, Veldhuis JD, Johnson ML. Saltation and stasis: a model of human growth. Science 1992;258:801–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett D. Dynamic systems theory and its potential role in guiding clinical practice in pediatric neurology. Synapse 1998;18:5–8
   Google Scholar
• Watson M, Horn S. ‘The ten pound note test’: suggestions for eliciting improved responses in the severely brain-injured patient. Brain Inj 1991;5:421–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shiel A, Wilson BA, McLellan DL, Horn S, Watson MJ. WHIM: The Wessex Head Injury Matrix Manual. Flempton, Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company Ltd, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Dennis-Jones C. Back pain clients being kept in ‘no-man’s land’. Ther Weekly 2006;32:1
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K, Halliwell D. The Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment (NPCNA): a directly costable outcome measure in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:253–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert R, Jamtvedt G, Mead J, Birger Hagen K. Practical Evidence-Based Physiotherapy. Edinburgh: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Watson MJ. Feasibility of further motor recovery in patients undergoing physiotherapy more than 6-months after severe traumatic brain injury: an updated literature review. Proceedings of The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Annual Congress, 7&8/10/05, International Convention Centre, Birmingham. London: CSP, 2006, 61–8
   Google Scholar