Haptic virtual rehabilitation in stroke: transferring research into clinical practice

References

• Jack D, Boian R, Merians AS, et al. Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2001;9(3):308–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizony R, Katz N, Weiss PL (eds). A model of VR-based intervention in rehabilitation: Relationship between motor and cognitive abilities and performance within virtual environments for patients with stroke. Proceeding of 5th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technology. Oxford: The University of Reading, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Baheux K, Yoshizawa M, Seki K, Handa Y. Virtual reality pencil and paper tests for neglect: a protocol. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006;9(2):192–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bardorfer A, Munih M, Zupan A, Primozic A. Upper limb motion analysis using haptic interface. IEEE Trans Mechatron 2001; 6(3):253–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdea GC, Lin MC, Ribarsky W, Watson B. Special issue on haptics, virtual, and augmented reality. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 2005;11(6):611–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Kim J, Ku J, et al. A virtual reality assessment and training system for unilateral neglect. Cyberpsychol Behav 2004;7(6):742–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14(2):52–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeren J, Bjorkdahl A, Pascher R, Rydmark M. Virtual reality and haptics as an assessment device in the postacute phase after stroke. Cyberpsychol Behav 2002;5(3):207–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tennant A, Geddes JM, Fear J, Hillman M, Chamberlain MA. Outcome following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1997;19(7):278–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJ. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21(8):357–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Bourget A. Predictors of long-term participation after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28(4):221–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Bacon RC, Berman AJ. Acquistion of a trace-conditioned avoidance response after deafferentation of the responding limb. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1965;59:275–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74(4):347–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Miltner WH, Bauder H, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998;250(1):5–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, McGrath RE. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a singleblinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(1):14–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce SR, Gallagher KG, Schaumburg SW, Gershkoff AM, Gaughan JP, Shutter L. Home forced use in an outpatient rehabilitation program for adults with hemiplegia: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003;17(4):214–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riks-Stroke. National Health Care Quality Registers in Sweden. Analyzed report from the National Stroke Register for the year 2005. 2006 [updated 2006; cited], available at: www.riks.stroke.org.
   Google Scholar
• Carr J, Shepherd R. A Motor Relearning Programme for Stroke. Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral- artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999;354(9174):191–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr J, Shepherd R. Neurological rehabilitation, optimizing motor performance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Broeren J, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS. Virtual reality and haptics as a training device for movement rehabilitation after stroke: a single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(8): 1247–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Hemineglect in acute stroke-incidence and prognostic implications. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997;76(2):122–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan PW, Cockburn J, Wilson BA. The behavioural assessment of unilateral visual neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1991; 1(1):5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Parton A, Malhotra P, Husain M. Hemispatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75(1):13–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson H, Hjelmquist EK, Jensen C, Blomstrand C. Search pattern in a verbally reported visual scanning test in patients showing spatial neglect. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002;8(3):382–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeren J, Samuelsson H, Stibrant-Sunnerhagen K, Blomstrand C, Rydmark M. Neglect assessment as an application of virtual reality. Acta Neurol Scand 2007;116(3):157–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeren J, Dixon M, Stibrant Sunnerhagen K, Rydmark M. Rehabilitation after stroke using virtual reality, haptics (force feedback) and telemedicine. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006;124:51–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swapp D, Pawar V, Loscos C. Interaction with co-located haptic feedback in virtual reality. Virtual Reality 2006;10(1):24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Broeren J, Rydmark M, Bjorkdahl A, Sunnerhagen KS. Assessment and training in a 3-dimensional virtual environment with haptics: a report on 5 cases of motor rehabilitation in the chronic stage after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21(2):180–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1985;39(6):386–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hebert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75(7):751–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills: User Manual, 4th edn. Forth Collins: Three Star Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher A. AMPS, Assessment of Motor and Process Skills: Development, Standardization, and Administration Manual, 5th edn. Fort Collins: Three Star Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Broeren J, Claesson L, Goude D, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS. Virtual rehabilitation in an activity centre for community-dwelling persons with stroke. The possibilities of 3-dimensional computer games. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;26(3):289–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, Zancan A, Thonnard JL. The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke 2001;32(7):1627–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penta M, Thonnard JL, Tesio L. ABILHAND: a Rasch-built measure of manual ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79(9):1038–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Wade DT. Visuospatial neglect: underlying factors and test sensitivity. Lancet 1989;2(8668):908–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham K, Tegner R. The baking tray task: a test of spatial neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1996;6(1):19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark VW, Woods AJ, Ball KK, Roth DL, Mennemeier M. Disorganized search on cancellation is not a consequence of neglect. Neurology 2004;63(1):78–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugshaupt T, Bopp SA, Heinemann D, et al. Residual oculomotor and exploratory deficits in patients with recovered hemineglect. Neuropsychologia 2004;42(9):1203–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann M, Ebert P, Black SE. Hemispatial neglect and visual search: a large scale analysis. Cortex 2004;40(2):247–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton A, Malhotra P, Nachev P, et al. Space re-exploration in hemispatial neglect. Neuroreport 2006;17(8):833–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz N, Hartman-Maeir A, Ring H, Soroker N. Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(4):379–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF. Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke 2006;37(5):1237–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viau A, Feldman AG, McFadyen BJ, Levin MF. Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004;1(1):11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trombly CA. Deficits of reaching in subjects with left hemiparesis: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46(10):887–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baheux K, Yoshizawa M, Tanaka A, Seki K, Handa Y. Diagnosis and rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect patients with virtual reality technology. Technol Health Care 2005;13(4):245–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamper DG, McKenna-Cole AN, Kahn LE, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83(5):702–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker RN, Brauer SG. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(20):1213- 23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch JE, Lewis JA, Burdea G. Technical and patient performance using a virtual reality-integrated telerehabilitation system: preliminary finding. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007;15(1):30–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden MK, Dyar TA, Dayan-Cimadoro L. Telerehabilitation using a virtual environment improves upper extremity function in patients with stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007;15(1):36–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai JC, Woo J, Hui E, Chan WM. Telerehabilitation - a new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation. J Telemed Telecare 2004;10(4):199–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg L, Langhorne P. Rehabilitation therapy services for stroke patients living at home: systematic review of randomised trials. Lancet 2004;363(9406):352–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Schwamm LH. Organizing regional stroke systems of care. Curr Opin Neurol 2008;21(1):43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugarman H, Dayan E, Weisel-Eichler A, Tiran J. The Jerusalem TeleRehabilitation System, a new low-cost, haptic rehabilitation approach. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006;9(2):178–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winters JM, Winters JM. A telehomecare model for optimizing rehabilitation outcomes. Telemed J E Health 2004;10(2):200–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo AA, Strickland D, Bouchard S. The challenge of using virtual reality in telerehabilitation. Telemed J E Health 2004; 10(2):184–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goude D, Bjork S, Rydmark M. Game design in virtual reality systems for stroke rehabilitation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007;125:146–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar