References
- Anderson RT. Nasometric values for normal Spanish-speaking females: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 1996; 33: 333–336.
- Bressmann T, Sader R, Whitehill TL, Awan SN, Zeilhofer H-F, Horch H-H. Nasalance distance and ratio: Two new measures. Cleft Palate-Craniofacl 2000; 37: 248–256.
- Dalston RM. The use of Nasometry in the assessment and remediation of velopharyngeal inadequacy. In Bzoch KR (Ed). Communication Disorders Related to Cleft Lip and Palate, 4th edn. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1997.
- Dalston RM, Neiman GS, Gonzalez-Landa G. Nasometric sensitivity and specificity: A cross-dialect and cross-culture study. Cleft Palate-Craniofac 1 1993; 30: 285–291.
- Dalston RM, Seaver EL Relative values of various standardized passages in the nasometric assessment of patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 1992; 29: 17–21.
- Dalston RM, Warren DW. Comparison of Tonar II, pressure-flow and listener judgements of hypemasal-ity in the assessment of velopharyngeal function. Cleft Palate 11986; 23: 108–115.
- Dalston RM, Warren DW, Dalston ET. Use of Nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 1991; 28: 184–188.
- Fletcher SG. Contingencies for bioelectronic modification of nasality. J Speech Hear Res 1972; 37: 329–346.
- Fletcher SG. `Nasalance' vs. listener judgements of nasality. Cleft Palate J 1976; 13: 31–44.
- Fomer LL. Speech segment durations produced by five and six year old speakers with and without cleft palates. Cleft Palate J 1983; 20: 185–198.
- Haapanen ML. Nasalance scores in patients with a modified Honig velopharyngeal flap before and after operation. Scand J Plastic Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1992; 26: 301–305.
- Hardin MA, Van De Mark DR, Morris HL, Payne MM. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgements of hypemasality and hyponasality. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 1992; 29: 346–351.
- Kamell MP. Nasometric discrimination of hypemasality and turbulent airflow. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 1995; 32: 145–148.
- Leeper HA, Rochet AP, Mackay RA. Characteristics of nasalance in Canadian speakers of English and French. In Abstracts of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Banff, Alberta, October 1992.
- Mayo R, Floyd LA, Warren DW, Dalston RM, Mayo CM. Nasalance and nasal area values: Cross-racial study. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 1996; 33: 143–149.
- McWilliams BJ, Morris HL, Shelton RL. Cleft Palate Speech, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: B.C. Decker, 1990.
- McWilliams BJ, Philips BJ. Velopharyngeal Incompetence: An Audio Seminar. Philadelphia: B.C. Decker, 1990.
- Nellis JL, Neiman GS, Lehman JA. Comparison of Nasometer and listener judgements of nasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function after pharyngeal flap surgery. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 1992; 29: 157–163.
- Nichols AC. Nasalance statistics for two Mexican populations. Cleft Palate-Craniofac I 1999; 36: 57–63.
- Philips BJ. Perceptual evaluation of velopharyngeal competency. Ann Otol, Rhino] Laryngol 1980; 69(Suppl.): 153–157.
- Seaver EG, Dalston RM, Leeper HA, Adams LE. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal reso-nance. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 715–721.
- So LKH. Cantonese Segmental Phonology Test. Hong Kong: Bradford Publishing, 1993.
- van Doom J, Purcell A. Nasalance levels in the speech of normal Australian children. Cleft Palate-Cran-iofac J 1998; 35: 287–292.
- Watterson T, McFarlane SC, Wright DS. The relationship between nasalance and nasality in children with cleft palate.J Commun Disord 1993; 26: 13–28.
- Watterson T, Lewis KE, Deutsch C. Nasalance and nasality in low pressure and high pressure speech. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J1998; 35: 293–298.
- Watterson T, Lewis KE, Dalston RM. Interpretation and clinical application of nasalance scores. Seminar presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Antonio, 1998.
- Whitehill TL. Nasalance measures in Cantonese-speaking women. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 2001; 38: 119–125.