Computer-Administrated Versus Paper-Based Assessment of School-Entry Phonological Awareness Ability

References

• Anderson, P., Lindsey, J., Schulz, W., Monseur, C., & Meiers, M. (2001). An evaluation of the technical and methodological aspects of the School Entry Assessment kit. Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bjomsson, J. (2008). Changing Icelandic national testing from traditional paper and pencil based tests to computer based assessment: Some background, challenges and problems to overcome. In F. Scheuermann & A. G. Pereira (Eds.), Towards a research agenda on computer-based assessment (pp. 10-14). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved 31st March 2009 from http://crell.jrc.it/CBA/EU-Report-CBA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blachman, B. A. (2000). Phonological awareness. In M. L Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 483–502). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgeman, B. (2009). Experiences from large-scale computer-based testing in the USA. In F. Scheuermann, & J. Bjornsson (Eds.), The transition to computer-based assessment. New approaches to skills assessment and implications for large-scale testing (pp. 39–44). Luxemburg: Office for Official Publica-tions of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W. (2009). The early identification of children atrisk for reading disability. Pre-sentation at the Literacy Research Symposium, lst-2nd October 2009, Christchurch, New Zealand. Retrieved 15th October 2009 http ://www. education. c ante rbury . ac . nz/ literacy_symposium/index.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Catts, H.W., Fey, M.E., Tomblin, J.B., & Zhang, X. (2002). A longitudinal investigation of read-ing outcomes in children with language im-pairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1142–1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future read-ing difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical imple-mentation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 38–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, M. (2008). PIRLS 2005/2006 in New Zealand: An overview of nation-al findings from the second cycle of the Progress in International Reading Lit-eracy Study (PIRLS). Retrieved 7th March 2009 from http://www.educationcounts. govt.nz/ publications/series/2539/pirls_0506/34905/3490
   Google Scholar
• Croft, C., Strafford, E., & Mapa, L. (2000). Stock-take/evaluation of existing diagnostic tools in literacy and numeracy, in English: A report to the Ministry of Education. Welling-ton, NZ: NZCER.
   Google Scholar
• Csapo, B., Molnar, G., & Toth, K. (2009). Comparing paper-and-pencil and online assess-ment of reasoning skills. A pilot study for introducing electronic testing in Lirge-scale assessment in Hungary. In F. Scheuermann & J. Bjornsson (Eds.), The transition to com-puter-based assessment. New approaches to skills assessment and implications for large-scale testing (pp. 113–118). Luxemburg: Of-fice for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, L. (2006). National school roll projections: July 2006 update. Retrieved 21st April 2010 from http://www.educationcounts. govt. nz/public ations/series/32104/national_ school_roll_projections/national_school_ roll_projections_2006 .
   Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Ciancio, D. J., & Fletcher, J. M. (2006). Validity, reliability and utility of the Observation Survey of early literacy achieve-ment. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 8–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar, S., & Telford, M. (2003). A study of the use of the School Entry Assessment (SEA) in schools. Wellington, NZ: Research Division Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, B., Crosbie, S., MacIntosh, B., Teitzel, T., & Ozanne, A. (2000). Preschool and Primary Inventory of Phonological Awareness (PI-PA). London, UK: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., & Dunn, M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Fourth Edition (PPVT-4). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. (2009). Computerised adaptive testing at the entrance of pri-mary school teacher training college. In F. Scheuermann & J. Bjornsson (Eds.), The tran-sition to computer-based assessment: New approaches to skills assessment and implica-tions for large-scale testing (pp. 134–144). Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 250–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrler, D. J., & McGhee, R. L. (2008). Primary Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (PTOND. Aus-tin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (2001). Early phonological development and the acquisition of literacy. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 111–125). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillon, G. T. (2004). Phonological awareness: From research to practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillon, G. T., & Schwarz, I. E. (2001). An international literature review of best practices in speech and language therapy: 2001 up-date. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Invernizzi, M. (2004). Phonological Awareness Literacy Screen. Charlottesville, VA: The Rec-tor and The Board of Visitors of the University of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write in one elementary school: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, R., & Good, R. (2009). What are Dibels? Retrieved 27th February 2011 from http://www.dibels.org/dibels.html
   Google Scholar
• Klee. T., & Tillard, G. (2010). Evidence-based assessment of child language disorders. Presentation at the New Zealand Speech-Language Therapy Association Conference: A practice worth spreading, 22-23 April 2010, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Long, S., Fey, M., & Channell, R. (2002). Profile of Phonology (PROPH). Computerized pro-filing [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.computerizedprofiling.org.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, K. B., Knobel, M. L. M., Knobel, B. L., & Sedlacek, L. G. (1991). Computer-adapted PPVT-R: A comparison between standard and modified versions within an elementary school population. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 199–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2008). New possibilities and challeng-es for assessment through the use of technol-ogy. In F. Scheuermann & A. G. Pereira (Eds.), Towards a research agenda on computer-based assessment (pp. 6–9). Luxembourg: Of-fice for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved 31st March 2009 from http ://crell.jrc .it/CBA/EU-Report-CBA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mayringer, H., & Wimmer, H. (2000). Pseudoname learning by German-speaking children with dyslexia: Evidence for a pho-nological learning deficit. Journal of Experi-mental Child Psychology, 75(2), 116–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowall, S., Boyd, S., Hodgen, E., & van Vliet, T. (2005). Reading recovery in NZ: Uptake, implementation, and outcomes, especially in relation to Maori and Pasifika students. Wel-lington, NZ: NZCER.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2004). New Zealand Articulation Test (VZAT). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E.J., & Kennedy, A.M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 International Report. Boston College, International Study Center, Lynch School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, L., Stackhouse, J., Goulandris, N., & Snowling, M. (2004). The development of early literacy skills among children with speech difficulties: A test of the "critical age hypothesis." Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 377–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2003). The nation's report card. Retrieved February 2011, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, T. (2003). Risk factors in learning to read. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and re-mediating reading difficulties: Bringing sci-ence to scale (pp. 165–193). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, T. (2009). Should beginner readers rely on context clues or not: The case for and against. Presentation at the Literacy Research Symposium, lst-2nd October 2009, Christ-church, New Zealand. Retrieved 15th Octo-ber 2009 http://www.education.canterbury. ac .nz/literacy_symp osium/index. shtml%
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. B. (1990). Applying computerized adap-tive testing in schools. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Develop-ment, 23, 31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, G., McNaughton, S., MacDonald, S., & Keith, M. (2002). Picking up the pace. Re-trieved 21st April 2010 from http://www.edu-cationcounts.govt.nz/ publications/pasifika_ education/4971
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2002). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raitano, NA., Pennington, B.F., Tunick, RA., Boada, R., & Shriberg, L.D. (2004). Pre-lit-eracy skills of a subgroup of children with speech sound disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(4), 821–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley, M.(2008). Technology in the service of 21st century learning and assessment: A UK perspective. In F. Scheuermann & A. G. Pereira (Eds.), Towards a research agenda on computer-based assessment (pp. 22-29). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved 31st March 2009 from http://crell.jrc.it/CBA/EU-Report-CBA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, C. H. (2001). Computer-based assessment in education. Educational and Child Psychology, 18(3), 58–74.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, C. H. (1997). Computerised assessment of reading. In J. R. Beech & C. H. Sin-gleton (Eds.), The psychological assessment of reading (pp. 257–278). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, C. H., Horne, J. K., & Thomas, K. V. (1999). Computerized baseline assessment. Journal of Reading Research, 22(1), 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, C. H., Horne, J. K., & Vincent, D. (1995). Implementation of a computer-based system for the diagnostic assessment of reading. Project Report to the National Council for Educational Technology. Hull: Department of Psychology, University of Hull.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.), (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snowling, M., Adams, J., Bishop, D. V M., & Sto-thard, S. E. (2001). Educational attainment of school leavers with a preschool history of speech-language impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 2, 173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Stothard, S.E., Snowling, M.J., Bishop, D.V.M., Chipchase, B.B., & Kaplan, C.A. (1998). Lan-guage-impaired preschoolers: A follow-up in-to adolescence. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41(2), 407–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W., & Prochnow, J. E. (2002). Preventing negative Matthew effects in at-risk readers: A retrospective study. Final Report-Phase IV to the Ministry of Education. Retrieved 2nd February 2009 from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/ publications/curriculum/5803
   Google Scholar
• Tymms, P. (2001). The development of a computer-adaptive assessment in the early years. Edu-cation and Child Psychology, 18(3), 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Jiao, H., Young, M., Brooks, T., & Olsen, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of testing mode effects in grade K-12 mathematics tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(2), 219–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Jiao, H., Young, M., Brooks, T., & Olsen, J. (2008). Comparability of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing in K-12 reading assessment: A meta-analysis of testing mode effects. Educational and Psychologi-cal Measurement, 68(1), 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, D., & Kingsbury, G. (2004). Application of computer adaptive testing to educational problems. Journal of Educational Measure-ment, 21, 361–375.
   Google Scholar
• Wiig, E., Secord, W., & Semel, E. (2006). Clinical Evaluations of Language Fundamentals Preschool-2nd Edition-Australian and New Zealand Editions. San Antonio, TX: Psycho-logical Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S.L., Thompson, J.A., & Wylie, G. (1982). Automated psychological testing for the severely physically handicapped. Interna-tional Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 291–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar