References
- Avilala, V. K. Y., Prabhu, P. P., & Barman, A. (2010). The effect of filtered speech on speech identification scores of young normal hearing adults. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 29(1), 117–122.
- Beattie, R. C., Edgerton, B. J., & Svihovec, D. V. (1977). A comparison of the Auditec of St. Lou-is cassette recordings of NU-6 and CID W-22 on a normal hearing population. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42, 60–64.
- Bocca, E., Calearo, C., & Cassinari, V. (1954). A new method for testing hearing in temporal lobe tumors. Acta Otolaryngolica, 44, 219–222.
- Borden, G. J., Harris, K. S., & Raphael, L. J. (2003). Speech science primer: Physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech (4th ed.), Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
- Bornstien, S. P., Wilson, R. H., & Cambron, N. K. (1994). Low- and high-pass filtered North-western University Auditory Test No. 6 for monaural and binaural evaluation. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 5, 259–264.
- Carhart, R., & Jerger, J. F. (1959). Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. Journal of Speech and Hear-ing Disorders, 24, 330–345.
- Causey, G. D., Hermanson, C. L., Hood, L. J., & Bowling, L. S. (1983). A comparative evalua-tion of the Maryland NU-6 auditory test.Jour-nal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 62–69.
- Mayadevi. (1974). The development and standardization of a common speech discrimination test for Indians. Unpublished disser-tation submitted to University of Mysore, in partial fulfillment of the Masters Degree in Speech and Hearing.
- Miller, G. A., Heise, G. A., & Lichten, W. (1951). The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 329–335.
- Niemeyer, W. (1965). Speech audiometry with phonemically balanced sentences. International Audiology, 4, 97–101.
- O'Neill, J. J. (1957). Recognition and intelligibil-ity of test materials in context and isolation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 22, 87–90.
- Orchik, D. J., & Burgess, J. (1977). Synthetic sen-tence identification as a function of the age of the listener. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 322–336.
- Orchik, D. J., Krygier, K. M., & Cutts, B. P. (1979). A comprehension of the NU-6 and W-22 speech discrimination tests for assessing sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 44, 522–527.
- Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. E. (1952). Control methods used in a study of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 175–184.
- Risberg, A., & Martony, J. (1972). A method for the classification of audiograms. In G. Fant, (Ed.), Speech communication abilities and profound deafness (pp. 135–139). Washing-ton, DC, A. G. Bell Association.
- Sairam, V.V.S. (2002). Long-term average speech spectrum in Kannada. Unpublished inde-pendent project submitted to University of Mysore, in partial fulfillment of the Masters Degree in Speech and Hearing.
- Savithri, S. R., Jayaram, M., Venugopal, M. B., & Rajasudhakar, R. (2007). Base of articulation of 13 Indian languages. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 26, 12–21.
- Stach, B. A. (1998). Clinical audiology: An introduction. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
- Wilson, R. H., & Margolis, R. H. (1983). Measurements of auditory thresholds for speech stimuli. Journal of Speech and Hearing Re-search, 11, 256–270.
- Yathiraj, A., & Vijayalakshmi, C. S. (2005). Phonemically balanced word list in Kannada. Developed in the Department of Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore.