References
- American National Standards Institute. (2004a). Criteria for permissible ambient noise dur-ing audiometric testing (ANSI S3.1-2004). New York, NY: Author.
- American National Standards Institute. (2004b). Specifications for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-2004). New York, NY: Author.
- Arlinger, S. (2003). Negative consequences of uncorrected hearing loss-a review. Interna-tional Journal of Audiology, 42\(Suppl. 2), 2S17–20.
- Baumfield, A., & Dillon, H. (2001). Factors affect-ing the USE and perceived benefit of ITE and BTE hearing aids. British Journal of Audiol-ogy, 35, 247–258.
- Cord, M. T., Surr, R. K., Walden, B. E., & Olson L. (2002). Performance of directional micro-phone hearing aids in everyday life. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13, 295–307.
- Cox, R. M., & Alexander, G. C. (2001). Validation of the SADL Questionnaire. Ear and Hearing, 22, 151–160.
- Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental status: A practical meth-od for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Re-search, 12, 189–198.
- Garstecki, D. C. (1996). Older adults: Hearing handicap and hearing instrument manage-ment. American Journal of Audiology, 5, 25–34.
- Humes, L. E., & Wilson, D. L. (2003). An exami-nation of changes in hearing-aid performance and benefit in the elderly over a 3-year pe-riod of hearing instrument use. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 137–145.
- Humes, L. E., Wilson, DL., Barlow, N.N., Garner, C. B., & Amos, N. (2002). Longitudinal chang-es in hearing instrument satisfaction and us-age in the elderly over a period of one or two years after hearing instrument delivery. Ear and Hearing, 23, 428–438.
- Jayarajan, V., & Rangan, S. (2000). Evaluation of hearing-aid provision in adults. Journal of Audiological Medicine, 9, 25–34.
- Kemker, B. E. (1999). The effects of pre-fitting and post-fitting hearing aid orientation on patient outcome. Doctoral dissertation. Uni-versity of Florida, Gainesville.
- Kemker, B. E., & Holmes, A. E. (2004). Analysis of pre-fitted vs. post-fitted hearing aid orien-tation using the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP). Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 15, 311–323.
- Kojbler, S., Rosenhall, U., & Hansson, H. (2001). Bilateral hearing aids: Effects and conse-quences from a user perspective. Scandina-vian Audiology, 30, 223–235.
- Kumar, M., Hickey, S., & Shaw S. (2000). Man-ual dexterity and successful hearing aid use. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 114, 593–597.
- McLeod, B., Upfold, L., & Broadbent, C. (2001). An investigation of the applicability of the inventory, Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life, at 2 weeks post hearing instrument fitting. Ear and Hearing, 22, 342–347.
- Mulrow, C. D. (1990). Quality-of-Life Changes and Hearing Impairment Annals of Internal Medicine, 113, 188.
- National Council on Aging (NCOA). (1998). The impact of untreated hearing loss in older Americans. Conducted by the Seniors Re-search Group. Supported through a grant from the Hearing Industries Association. Pre-liminary report, December 28,1998.
- Patterson, C. (1994). Prevention of hearing im-pairment and disability in the elderly. In Ca-nadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care, 954–963. Ottawa: Health Canada.
- Ries, P. W. (1994). Prevalence and characteristics of persons with hearing trouble: United States, 1990-91. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics, /0(188), 1–75.
- Stark, P., & Hickson, L. (2004). Outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older people with hear-ing impairment and their significant others. International Journal of Audiology, 43, 390–398.
- Surr, R. K., Walden, B. E., Cord, M. T., & Olson, L. (2002). Influence of environmental factors on hearing instrument microphone prefer-ence. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13, 308–322.
- Ventry, I., & Weinstein, B. E. (1983) Identifica-tion of elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA, 25, 37–42.