The phonological processing of Chinese phonograms

References

• Baron J & Strawson C (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2, 386–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijing University of Aeronauts and Astronauts (1987). Dictionary of Usage Frequency of Modern Chi-nese words. Beijing: Space Press Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Besner D & Smith MC (1992). Basic processing in reading: is the orthographic depth hypothesis sinking? In P Frost & L Katz (Eds), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology and Meaning. Amsterdam: Else-vier.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y & Peng DL (1994). A connectionist model of Chinese characters recognition and naming. In HW. Chang, JT Huang, CW Hue & OJL Tzeng (Eds), Advances In The Study of Chinese Language Processing, Vol. I. Taiwan: Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart M (1978). Lexical access in a simple reading task. In G Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of Human Information Processing. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fang SP, Horng R Y & Tzeng O JL (1986). Consistency effect and pseudo-character naming task. In SK Kao & R Hoosain (Eds), Linguistics, Psychology and the Chinese Language. Hong Kong: Univer-sity of Hong Kong Center of Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Forster KI (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In RJ Wales & E Walkers (Eds), New Approaches to Language Mechanisms. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Glushko RG (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Jour-nal of Experimental Psychology 5,674–697.
   Google Scholar
• Gough PB & Cosky MJ (1977). One second of reading again. In NJ Castellan, DB Pisoni & GR Potts (Eds), Cognitive Theory, Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hoosain R (1991). Psycholinguistic Implications for Linguistic Relativity: A Case Study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hue CW (1992). Recognition processing in character naming. In HC Chen & OJL Tzeng (Eds), Lan-guage Processing in Chinese. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Jared D, McRae K & Seidenberg M S (1985a). The time course of phonological activation in two writing systems. Cognition 19, 1–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jared D & Seidenberg MS (1990). The basis of consistency effect in word recognition. Journal of Mem-ory and Language 29, 687–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz L & Frost R (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: the Orthographic Depth Hypothesis. In P Frost & L Katz (Eds), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology and Meaning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland JL & Rumelhart D (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter percep-tion, Part 1: An account of the basic findings. Psychological Review 88, 375–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE & The PDP Group (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton J (1980). The Iogogen Model and orthographic structure. In U Frith (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Spelling. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peng DL, Yang H & Chen Y (1994). Consistency and phonetic independence effects in naming task of Chinese phonograms. In QC Jing & HC Zhang (Eds), Information Processing of Chinese Language. Beijing: Beijing Normal University.
   Google Scholar
• Peng DL, Zhang B Y & Liu Z Z (1993). Lexical decomposition and whole word storage of Chinese coor-dinative two-character words. In S Wang (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Afro-Asian Psychologi-cal Congress. Peking: Peking University Press, pp. 92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti CA & Zhang SL (1991). Phonological processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 17(4), 633–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg MS (1985a). The time course of phonological activation in two writing systems. Cognition 19, 1–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg MS (1985b). The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recogni-tion. Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice 5, 200–246.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg MS & McClelland JL (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 96, 523–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg MS, Waters GS, Barnes MA & Tanenhaus MK (1984). When does irregular spelling or pro-nunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23, 383–404.
   Google Scholar
• Shu H & Zhang HC (1987). The processing of pronunciation Chinese characters by proficient mature readers. Acta Psychologica Sinica 3, 282–290.
   Google Scholar
• Tan LH, Hoosain R & Peng D L (1995). Role of early presemantic phonological code in Chinese charac-ter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21(1), 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang BY & Peng DL (1992). Decomposed storage in Chinese lexicon, In HC Chen & OJL Tzeng (Eds), Language Processing in Chinese. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JJ & Peng DL (1993). Experimental study on the retrieval of feature meaning of Chinese words. Acta Psychologica Sinica 25(2), 140–147.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JJ, Peng D L & Zhang H C (1991). The recovery of meaning of Chinese characters in the classify-ing process. Acta Psychologica Science No. 2,139–144.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang BY, Zhang J J & Peng D L (1990). The recovery of meaning of Chinese characters in the classify-ing process. Acta Psychologica Sinica 22,282–290.
   Google Scholar