23
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Studies in cross-language speech perception

Pages 1-23 | Published online: 18 Jul 2013

  • Ali HL, Gallagher T, Goldstein J & Daniloff RU (1971) Perception of coarticulated nasality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49, 538–540.
  • Archangeili D (1988) Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5,183–207.
  • Borden G, Gerber A & Milsark G (1983) Production and perception of the Id-IU contrast in Korean adults learning English. Language Learning 33(4), 499–526.
  • Crosjean F (1980) Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psy-chophysics 28,267–283.
  • Cutler A (1994). Segmentation problems, rhythmic solutions. Lingua 92, 81–104.
  • Fletcher JE and McVeigh A (1992) Towards a model of segment and syllable duration in Australian English. In J. Pittam (Ed.) Proceedings of the Fourth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Brisbane: ASSTA, pp. 28–33.
  • Gillette S (1980) Contextual variation in the perception of L and R by Japanese and Korean speakers. Minnesota Papers on Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language (University of Minnesota, Min-neapolis) 6, 59–72.
  • Goto H (1971) Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds 'L' and `12'. Neuropsycholo-gia 9, 317–323.
  • Henly E & Sheldon A (1986) Duration and context effects on the perception of English In and /1/: a com-parison of Cantonese and Japanese speakers. Language Learning 36, 505–521.
  • Hong Y-S (1991) A Sociolinguistic Study of Seoul Korean, Korean Unification Studies, Series 12. Seoul: Research Centre for Peace & Unification of Korea.
  • Ingram JC & Mylne T (1994) Perceptual parsing of nasal vowels. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Vol. 2. Yokahama: Japan, pp. 495–498.
  • Ingram JC & Park S-G (1996a) Inter-language vowel perception and production by Korean and Japanese listeners. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Philadelphia (forthcoming).
  • Ingram JC & Park S-G (1996b) Language, context and speaker effects in the identification and discrimi-nation of English In and /1/ by Japanese and Korean listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (submitted).
  • Ingram JC & Park S-G (1997) Cross-language vowel perception and production by Korean and Japanese listeners. Journals of Phonetics 25 (3) (forthcoming)
  • Juszyk PW, Cutler A & Redanz N J (1993) Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of Eng-lish words. Child Development 64, 675–687.
  • Khul P K, Williams K A, Lacerda F, Stevens K N & Lindblom B (1992) Linguistic experience alters pho-netic perception in infants by 6 months of age, Science 255, 606–608.
  • Lahiri A & Marslen Wilson WD (1991) The mental representation of lexical form: a phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition 38, 245–294.
  • Liberman A Mattingly 1(1985) The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21, 1–36.
  • Lively SE & Pisoni DB (1993) Training Japanese listeners to identify English In and /1/, II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94, 1242–1255.
  • Lively SE, Pisoni D B & Logan J S (1992). Some effects of training Japanese listeners to Identify English In and /1/. In Y Tohkura, E Vatikiotis-Bateson & Y Sgisaka (Eds) Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure. Tokyo/Amsterdam: Ohmsha-IOS Press, pp. 175–196.
  • Lobanov B (1971) Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49,606–608.
  • Logan JS, Lively S E & Pisoni D B (1991) Training Japanese listeners to identify In and 11/ . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89, 874–886.
  • Mann VA (1986) Distinguishing universal and language-dependent levels of speech perception: evidence for Japanese listeners' perceptions of '1' and 'r'. Cognition 24, 169–196.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1989) Access and integration: projecting sound into meaning. In W.D. Marslen-Wilson Lexical Representation and Process. Cambridge, MA: Bradford (MIT Press).
  • McQueen JM (1995) Processing versus representation: comments on Ohala and Ohala. In B Connell & A Arvaniti Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–67.
  • Mochizuki M (1981) The identification of /r/ and /1/ in natural and synthesised speech. Journal of Phonet-ics 9, 283–303.
  • Ohala JJ (1992) Comments on Chapter 9. In GJ Docherty & DR Ladd Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, Segment, Prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 255–257.
  • Ohala JJ & Ohala M (1995) Speech perception and lexical representation: the role of vowel nasalization in Hindi and English. In B Connell & A Arvaniti (eds) Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–60.
  • Park S-G & Ingram JC (1995) /1/ and In perception by Korean and Japanese speakers learning English: the relative importance of LI transfer effects and universal acoustic factors. Korean Journal of Lin-guistics 20(4), 87–109.
  • Perkell JS & Klatt DH (1986) Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pittam J & Ingram JC (1992) Accuracy of perception and production of compound and phrasal stress by Vietnamese Australians. Applied Psycholinguistics 13, 1–12.
  • Sapir E (1933) The psychological reality of phonemes. In VB Makkai (1972) Phonological Theory: Evo-lution and Current Practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Sheldon A & Strange W (1982) The acquisition of In and /1/ by Japanese learners of English: evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics 3, 243–261. Strange WS (1995) Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore: York Press.
  • Studdert Kennedy M (1976) Speech perception. In NJ Lass Contemporary Issues in Experimental Pho-netics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 243–282.
  • Tsuzuki M (1992) A phonetic study of the Korean and Japanese Lateral, Flap, and Nasal. Unpublished PhD thesis, Seoul National University.
  • Vihman MV (1996) Phonological Development: the Origins of Language in the Child. Cambridge, MA Blackwell.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.