The Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language - Revised: an Australian study

References

• Adler S. Dialectical differences: professional and clinical implications. J Speech Hear Disord 1971; 36: 90–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown R. A First Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Carrow E. Test of Auditory Comprehension of Language. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Carrow-Woolfolk E. Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language — Revised: Test Book; Examiner's Manual; and Individual Record Form. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle C. Are C-tests valid measures for second language vocabulary research? Second Lang Res 1994; 10(2): 157–187.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Language Learning Disorders. Issues in determining eligibility for language intervention. ASHA 1989; 31 (March): 113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Cormack RA, Woirall LE. Australian items and normative data for Australian children on the Boston Naming Test. Aust J Hum Commun Disord 1994; 22(1): 74–85.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to Classical and Modem Test Theory. New York: CBS College Publishing, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal D, Fletcher P, Garman M. The Grammatical Analysis of Language Disability. London: Edward Arnold, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson F. Norms appropriacy of achievement tests: Spanish-speaking children and English children'snorms. Lang Testing 1994; 11(1): 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• de Renzi E, Vignolo LA. The Token Test - a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain 1962; 85: 665–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn LM, Dunn LM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - Revised (PPVT-R). Minnesota: American Guidance Service, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins J. The use of the Revised Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities with some Queensland children. Aust Psychologist 1974; 9(3): 71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins J. ITPA norms for Australian children. Aust Psychologist 1976; 11(2): 193–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evard BL, Sabers DL. Speech and language testing with distinct ethnic-racial groups: a survey of procedures for improving validity. J Speech Hear Disord 1979; 44: 271–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glenister JM. Reduction of cultural bias in Simon's Evaluating Communicative Competence for Australian clinical settings. Aust J Hum Commun Disord 1989; 17(2): 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hatten JT. Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language. In OF Buros ed. The Eighth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Henning G. A Guide To Language Testing. New York, NY: Newbury House, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Howell J, Skinner C, Gray M, Broomfield S. A study of the comparative effectiveness of different language tests with two groups of children. Br J Disord Commun 1981; 16(1): 31–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howlin P, Kendall L. Assessing children with language tests - which test to use? Br J Disord Commun 1991; 26: 355–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Illerbrun D, Haines L, Greenough P. Language identification screening test for kindergarten: a comparison with four screening and three diagnostic language tests. Lang, Speech Hear Services in Schools1985; 16(4): 280–292.
   Google Scholar
• James DGH. The efficacy of a language screening battery for Australian five-year-old children. Aust J Hum Commun Disord 1994; 22(2): 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston Naming Test, revised edn. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk SA, McCarthy JJ, Kirk WD. The Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities, revised edn. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence CW. Assessing the use of age-equivalent scores in clinical management. Lang, Speech, Hear Services in Schools 1992; 23(1): 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lund NJ, Duchan JF. Assessing Children's Language in Naturalistic Contexts. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie KC, Dermody PJ. A normative study of the Token Test. Aust J Hum Commun Disord 1981; 9(1): 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley R. Measurement as a dangerous activity. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1989; 13(1): 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden TU. Creating language impairments in typically achieving children: the pitfalls of `normal' normative sampling. Lang, Speech, Hear Services in Schools 1996; 27(1): 3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick S. Validity. In RL Linn, ed. Educational Measurement, 3rd edn. New York: ACE/Macmillan, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Millen CE, Rutting CA. Inconsistencies across three language comprehension tests for specific grammatical features. Lang, Speech, Hear Services in Schools 1979; 10:162–170.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JF. Assessing Language Production in Children: Experimental Procedures. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JF and Paul R. The Clinical Assessment of Language Comprehension. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Miller L. Testing and the creation of disorder. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol 1993; January: .13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Miller SL. Introductory Statistics for Dentistry and Medicine. Reston, VA: Reston, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Moss PA. Can there be validity without reliability? Educ Researcher 1994; 23(2): 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Moss P. Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: voices from interpretative research traditions. Educ Researcher 1996; 25(1): 20–28,43.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson HA, Marquardt TP. Appraisal and Diagnosis of Speech and Language Disorders, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Records NL, Tomblin JB. Clinical decision making: describing the decision rules of practicing speech-language pathologists. J Speech Hear Res 1994: 37(1): 144–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reed VA, Holmes AA. Australian children's performances on the Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language. Aust J Hum Commun Disord 1981: 9(2): 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew CE. The Action Picture Test. Oxford: CE Renfrew, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo JM, Stephens MI. Performance of children with normal and impaired oral language production on a set of auditory comprehension tests. J Speech Hear Disord 1981; 46: 150–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharpley CF, Stone JM. An exploratory investigation to detect cross-cultural differences on the PP'VT-R. Psychology in the Schools 1985; 22: 383–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard LA. Evaluating test validity. In L Darling-Hammond, ed. Review of Research in Education 19. Washington, DC: AERA, 1993
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale GR, Tiemey RJ, Ames WS, Wray RH. A cross-cultural comparison of item analysis data on the Revised ITPA. Aust Psychologist 1978; 13(3): 391–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale GR, Wray RH. The use of the Revised ITPA with Australian children: a preliminary normative study. Aust Psychologist 1975; 10(1): 13–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waryus C, Ruder K . On the limitations of language comprehension procedures and an alternative. J Speech Hear Disord 1974; 39(1): 44–52.
   Google Scholar