REFERENCES
- Akamatsu CT and Musselman C. Nature versus nurture in the development of cognition in deaf people. In: Spencer PE, Erting CJ, and Marschark E (Eds) The Deaf Child in the Family and at School: Essays in Honour of Kathryn P. Meadow-Orlans. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2000: 255–274.
- Anastasi A and Urbina S. Psychological Testing (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1997.
- Braden JP. A meta-analytic review of IQ research with deaf persons. In: Martin DS (Ed),Advances in Cognition, Education, and Deafness. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press, 1991.
- Braden JP. Hard-of-hearing and deaf clients: Using the WISC IV with clients who are hard-of-hearing or deaf. In: Prifitera A, Saklofske DH, and Weiss E (Eds), WISC IV Clinical Use and Interpretation: Scientist-Practitioner Perspectives 2005: 351–376; Elsevier: Boston.
- Braden JP and Hannah JM. Assessment of hearing-impaired and deaf children with the WISC III. In: Prifitera A and Sakolfske DH (Eds), WISC III: Clinical Use and Intepretation 1998: 175–201. San Diego: Academic Press.
- Flanagan DP, Genshaft JL, and Harrison PL. The functional utility of intelligence tests with special education populations. In: Flanagan DP, Genshaft JL, and Harrison E (Eds), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests and Issues 1997: 457–483. New York: The Guilford Press.
- Johnson T. Whither the Deaf community? Population, genetics and the future of Australian Sign Language. American Annals of the Deaf 2004; 148 (5): 358–375.
- Kaufman AS and Lichtenberger source. Essentials of WISC III and WPPSI-R Assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2000.
- Konold TR, Glutting JJ, McDermott PA, Kush JC, and Watkins MM. Structure and diagnostic benefits of a normative subtest taxonomy developed from the WISC III standardisation sample. Journal of School Psychology 1999; 37(1): 29–48.
- Mailer SJ. Deafness and WISC III item difficulty: Invariance and fit. Journal of School Psychology 1997; 35: 299–314.
- Mailer SJ and Braden article. The construct and criterion-related validity of the WISC III with deaf adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 1993; 11: 105–113.
- Marschark M. Psychological Development of Deaf Children. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
- Phelps L. Utility of the WISC III for children with language impairments. In: Prifitera A and Sakolfske DH (Eds), WISC III Clinical Use and Intepretation: Scientist-Practioner Perspectives 1998: 157–174. San Diego: Academic Press.
- Rourke BP. Significance of verbal-performance discrepancies for subtypes of children with learn-ing disabilities: Opportunities for the WISC III. In: Prifitera A and Sakolfske DH (Eds), WISC III Clinical Use and Interpretation: Scientist-Practioner Perspectives 1998: 139–156. San Diego: Academic Press.
- Sattler JM and Saklofske DH. Interpreting the WISC III. In: Sattler JM (Ed.), Assessment of Children: Cognitive Applications (4th ed.) 2001: 298–334. San Diego: Sattler Publishing Inc.
- Semel E, Wiig EH, and Secord WA. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals — Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1995.
- Slate JR and Fawcett article. Validity of the WISC III for deaf and hard of hearing persons. American Annals of the Deaf 1995; 140 (3): 250–254.
- Sullivan PM and Montoya article. Factor analysis of the WISC III with deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Psychological Assessment 1997; 9 (3): 317–321.
- Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children — Third Edition. Australian Adaptation.San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace and Company, 1992.
- Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children — Fourth Edition. Australian Adaptation.San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace and Company, 2003.