Current Products and Practices

References

• Seeram E. 3-D imaging: basic concepts for radiologic technologists. Radiol Technol 1997; 69: 127–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broadbent BS. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931; 1: 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Singh IJ, Savara BS. Norms of size and annual increments of seven anatomical measures of maxillae in girls from three to sixteen years of age. Angle Orthod 1966; 36: 312–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean D, Hans MG, Bookstein FL, Subramanyan K. Three-dimensional Bolton-Brush Growth Study landmark data: ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of the Bolton standards cohort. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000; 37: 145–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanyan K, Dean D. Scanned bi-orthogonal radiographs as a source for 3D cephalometric data. SPIE 1996; 34: 717–24.
   Google Scholar
• Burke PH, Beard FH. Stereophotogrammetry of the face. A preliminary investigation into the accuracy of a simplified system evolved for contour mapping by photography. Am J Orthod 1967; 53: 769–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Udupa J, Herman G. 3D Imaging in Medicine. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Baumrind S. Integrated three-dimensional craniofacial mapping: background, principles, and perspectives. Semin Orthod 2001; 7: 223–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT, Bock M, Siebert JP. Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery — the clinical application of a new method. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 2002; 17: 318–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palomo JM, Dean D, Broadbent BJ. Three-dimensional craniofacial shape change in sixteen female Bolton faces. In McNamara JJ (Ed.) The Enigma of the Vertical Dimension, Craniofacial Growth Series, pp. 287–310. Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Center for Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub AF, Siebert P, Moos KF, Wray D, Urquhart C, Niblett TB. A vision-based three-dimensional capture system for maxillofacial assessment and surgical planning. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 36: 353–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motoyoshi M, Namura S, Arai HY. A three-dimensional measuring system for the human face using three-directional photography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 431–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen CX, Nissanov J, Ozturk C, Nuveen MJ, Tuncay OC. Three-dimensional imaging of the craniofacial complex. Clin Orthod Res 2000; 3: 46–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuncay OC. Three-dimensional imaging and motion animation. Semin Orthod 2001; 7: 244–50.
   Google Scholar
• Techalertpaisarn P, Kuroda T. Three-dimensional computer-graphic demonstration of facial soft tissue changes in mandibular prognathic patients after mandibular sagittal ramus osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg 1998; 13: 217–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curry S, Baumrind S, Carlson S, Beers A, Boyd R. Integrated three-dimensional craniofacial mapping at the Craniofacial Research Instrumentation Laboratory/University of the Pacific. Semin Orthod 2001; 7: 258–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ras F, Habets LL, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Quantification of facial morphology using stereophotogrammetry – demonstration of a new concept. J Dent 1996; 24: 369–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoub AF, Wray D, Moos KF, Siebert P, Jin J, Niblett TB, et al. Three-dimensional modeling for modern diagnosis and planning in maxillofacial surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg 1996; 11: 225–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayoub AF, Garrahy A, Hood C, White J, Bock M, Siebert JP, et al. Validation of a vision-based three-dimensional facial imaging system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003; 40: 523–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert JP, Marshall S. Human body 3D imaging by speckle texture projection photogrammetry. Sensor Review 2000; 20: 218–26.
   Google Scholar
• Available at: www.faraday.gla.ac.uk (accessed January 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Serrao G. Facial three-dimensional morphometry. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 109: 86–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi T, Ueda K, Honma K, Sasakura H, Hanada K, Nakajima T. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology before and after orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1990; 18: 68–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCance AM, Moss JP, Wright WR, Linney AD, James DR. A three-dimensional soft tissue analysis of 16 skeletal class III patients following bimaxillary surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 30: 221–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss JP, McCance AM, Fright WR, Linney AD, James DR. A three-dimensional soft tissue analysis of fifteen patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions after bimaxillary surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105: 430–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCance AM, Moss JP, Fright WR, James DR, Linney AD. A three dimensional analysis of soft and hard tissue changes following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in skeletal III patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 30: 305–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCance AM, Moss JP, Fright WR, James DR, Linney AD. A three-dimensional analysis of bone and soft tissue to bone ratio of movements in 17 Skeletal II patients following orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 1993; 15: 97–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soncul M, Bamber MA. The optical surface scan as an alternative to the cephalograph for soft tissue analysis for orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg 1999; 14: 277–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris DO, Illing HM, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part II — the soft tissues. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20: 663–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail SF, Moss JP, Hennessy R. Three-dimensional assessment of the effects of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on the face. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2002; 121: 244–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCance AM, Moss JP, Fright WR, Linney AD, James DR. Three-dimensional analysis techniques — Part 1: three-dimensional soft-tissue analysis of 24 adult cleft palate patients following Le Fort I maxillary advancement: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997; 34: 36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne CO, Kerr WJ, Ayoub AF. Development of a three-dimensional imaging system for analysis of facial change. Clin Orthod Res 2001; 4: 105–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Schmitz JH. Soft-tissue facial morphometry from 6 years to adulthood: a three-dimensional growth study using a new modeling. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 768–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz S, Cuzzi J. Biostereometric analysis of surgically corrected abnormal faces. Am J Orthod 1977; 72: 526–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Motegi N, Tsutsumi S, Okumura H, Yokoe Y, Iizuka T. Morphologic changes in the perioral soft tissues in patients with mandibular hyperplasia using a laser system for three-dimensional surface measurement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28: 15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar